Photo evidence of ectoplasm and ghost orbs explained

2007 December 12

By Andy Kaiser
Article ID: 119

Yes, of course the photo of ghost orbs and ectoplasm was faked.

The question isn’t whether or not it was faked. Or even if I did a good job at it. The issues I’d like to discuss are these:

Why should one be critical of such claims?

In order to flex our critical thinking muscles, what false assumptions and mistakes did the original “proof” article present?

The answer to the first question should be evident. Critical thinking and a skeptical outlook is needed to prevent abuse by others, as well as to stop you from wasting your time time and resources. Put in a much longer format, here is a big article with reasons why critical thinking and skepticism is important.

The answer to the second question is a fun and interesting examination of my ectoplasm and orb photo and my stated “facts” about the ectoplasmodic event.

The picture of ectoplasm and ghost orbs

First, let’s look again at the photo.

While it’s true I didn’t do any editing of the photo except for resizing and cropping, I didn’t specify how much cropping was done. Here’s the “proof” photo, followed by the uncropped original:

Photo evidence of ectoplasm and ghost orbs

orbs-ectoplasm-ghost-expanded.jpg

When you see the complete photo and realize the camera is facing up towards the ceiling, everything else falls into perspective. The orb/ghost on the upper left is just one of the many light fixtures on the ceiling of my kitchen. The orb/ghost on the lower right is most likely an artifact or lens flaring caused by one of the multiple lights.

Ectoplasm and ghost orb description

Let’s look at some of the claims from the original article, and address each one. For purposes of entertainment, education and logical examination, we’ll assume the author wasn’t me.

I didn’t know what it was. But I knew – I KNEW – that it was alive.

That’s a contradiction: If you don’t know what it was, how did you know with such certainty it was alive?

I also felt two other “beings” there with me. I felt like I was being judged, or watched.

Did this information just come out of nowhere? Were these beings communicating with you? Or was this information invented after the fact, trying to grasp at something, trying to explain a weird event?

I also knew that I didn’t have much time.

Sounds again like you’re inventing facts after the initial event. Was there perhaps “no time” because the event itself was so short, and you only realized that after it was over? There is a difference between claiming supernatural knowledge and examining a situation after it’s passed.

How can you ignore it, when it’s right there in front of my face? You can clearly see the blob of ectoplasm hovering just after it forced its way out of my mouth. There are the other two ghosts as well, one orb brightly shining on the upper left, and a small blue orb on the right.

I can ignore it because photos can easily be doctored or faked. You need more supporting evidence than that. If you’re going to claim something as physics-bending as hissing ectoplasm vomiting from your mouth and floating ghost orbs, be ready for some serious backlash. Things that violate our testable universal laws are regarded as unbelievable for just that reason.

This photo evidence was completely untouched, except for necessary resizing and cropping.

You may be lying. In addition, identical photos can be taken without supernatural help. Since it’s so easy to fake such a thing, we’ll just assume that’s what you did (at least until you provide more supporting evidence).

Any sense of ghost presences also vanished.

Convenient. Allows you to make a claim without producing evidence.

Forget the naysayers. I saw it, I know it’s true.

You’re free to believe anything you want. But without any kind of more substantial or verifiable proof, no one is going to believe you.

Summary and description of ectoplasm

This long and involved claim and debunking argument with myself will, ideally, serve some purpose. It shows that because one makes a claim, not only are you under no obligation to believe it, it’s up to that person to give more proof than simply “trust me”.

What about the star of the show – the ectoplasm itself? Well, I needed something unique and original. Something that had its own look, something that would never be duplicated.

And lucky for me, my family had just eaten pizza for dinner that night: The ectoplasm is a pizza crumb placed in the middle of the camera lens. All I did was stick my face in the way and give a weird look while I took the picture.

The orbs and ghost artifacts were an accidental bonus, actually. I had to point the camera up at my face so the crumb wouldn’t fall off the lens. And while pointing up, the ceiling lights happened to be placed just right to cause the effects you see.

All in all, a fun and successful experiment: I now know how to take a picture of a ghost. I know how to take a picture of ectoplasm and cool-looking orbs.

Turns out, it’s really easy. All you need to do is eat some pizza.



Other articles related to this topic:

12 Comments
2008 April 18

With todays technology it seems to be quite easy for one to fake a ghost photo & turn it around & claim it as authentic evidence. How is the general public who may be in need of “Paranormal Investigators Services” suppossed to know who to turn to.

Thanks for listening.
real P.R.O.O.F. Inc.

2008 July 22
Andrea permalink

I have encountered many a strange things in my home. I have heard humming, lights go on and off and things moving into different places and shadows of people that are not really there. I have other experiences to share but i will keep that till next time.

2008 September 8
Thozmaniac permalink

I can duplicate any ghost photo ever taken using photoshop and/or other imaging and editing programs.
Because I can do this does that mean all ghost photo’s are fake?
This is a slippery slope, since nobody living knows nor will they ever know the answer.

I remain a skeptic until I see the proof with my own two eyes while in a sober awake state.
But life after death may exist.

2008 September 8

Because I can do this does that mean all ghost photo’s are fake?

No. But it brings up the question of duplication. If a ghost photo is so easy to fake, then:

1) It increases the probability that *any* photo of a ghost has also been similarly faked.

2) It increases the need for extraordinary evidence to be able to prove a ghost is real. An easily-faked photo isn’t going to cut it.

2008 December 17

This is a cheesy article. you state as a fact that the photo was faked. you need to back up your emphatic assertion with facts, the proof lies on you if you’re going to make definite assertions without proof. I think you just proved the point you’re trying to make by making an example of yourself, am i wrong?
But on the other hand, what if the person did see real sentient orbs? They would not be wrong in asserting this in their article, and whether people agree or disagree with them has nothing to do with anything.

now lets take a closer look at a your article:

…..

“Let’s look at some of the claims from the original article, and address each one. For purposes of entertainment, education and logical examination, we’ll assume the author wasn’t me.

‘I didn’t know what it was. But I knew – I KNEW – that it was alive.’

That’s a contradiction: If you don’t know what it was, how did you know with such certainty it was alive?”

…….

That is not a contradiction. Why do you have to know what something is to know if it’s alive with certainty. If it’s hovering around you and you get the feeling it’s examining you or sentient or something why would you doubt yourself, because it’s not talking english with you? Haven’t you ever known someone is looking at you and you look over that way and they are? Doesn’t happen too often with rocks, at least to me it doesn’t. It only happens to me with living beings. You can’t just throw that out because it’s not what your brand of “science”.

…….

‘I also felt two other “beings” there with me. I felt like I was being judged, or watched.’

Did this information just come out of nowhere? Were these beings communicating with you? Or was this information invented after the fact, trying to grasp at something, trying to explain a weird event?

…………

maybe it did come out of nowhere. This where modern “science” has gotten us. the unltimate religion and people don’t even see it. you are saying they didn’t talk to him using esp because the event never happened. You aren’t using actual science you are using the religion of science.

2008 December 26

Hi Ty,

This is a cheesy article. you state as a fact that the photo was faked.

I fully agree about the cheese diagnosis. However, perhaps I was too tongue-in-cheek about the rest:

you need to back up your emphatic assertion with facts, the proof lies on you if you’re going to make definite assertions without proof. I think you just proved the point you’re trying to make by making an example of yourself, am i wrong?

Nope, you are right: this was one of the points I was trying to get across, by pretending I was an easily-refuted counter example.

Haven’t you ever known someone is looking at you and you look over that way and they are?

Sure, everyone has. But that’s coincidence. If you think otherwise, try a double-blinded test to confirm your psychic ability. I think you’ll find what you think is extrasensory power is… well… not.

You aren’t using actual science you are using the religion of science.

I’m sorry it came across that way. This might be my indicator for future articles – say exactly what I mean! To respond to that aspect, what I was trying to say was: if you assume the supernatural without evidence of such, you open yourself to all kinds of poorly-founded delusions (at best), and (at worst) abuse from others.

Andy

2008 December 26

Hi Andy, Well touche’ on some of what you said, didn’t follow all of it but it’s late at night….
Anyways I think we basically agree on this stuff. If you have more paranormal stories like dyatlov pass that would be great to discuss. If I came across too harsh I was probably in a bad mood at the time or something, I let it all out sometimes on passers by.
Some things I’ve been interested in if anyone wants to post an article and debate:
string theory laymans version laid out pros and cons, palestine israeli possible peace solutions.

2008 December 27

String theory would be a very interesting article. I am beginning to work on a laymans guide to the Singularity, so hopefully that well provide for some nice discussion. I am just in the beginning though, so it might be some time until you see it posted here.

2009 March 26

Any photograher would immediately know — even in the cropped version — that a light’s reflection caused the ‘orb and ectoplasm’.

2009 April 12
jake permalink

it’s extremely easy to do this with photoshop or gimp. lame dude. if you use jpeg snoop, it will tell you which compression methods were used by which program to edit the picture.

2009 April 12

Hi Jake,

> it’s extremely easy to do this with photoshop or gimp. lame dude

Very true. As I said above: this was one of the points I was trying to get across, by pretending I was an easily-refuted counter example.

2009 August 23
brilliant gonzaga permalink

I also believe in ghost ’cause I also experience those strange things but I believe that we always have to believe in God…

Comments are closed for this entry.