Human static electricity generators: Can a person’s body generate static electricity?

2008 February 24

By Andy Kaiser
Article ID: 125

Is your body a static electricity generator? Do you produce static electricity, shocking everything you touch? Do watches, computers and other electronics behave differently for you than for other people? Is every handshake a shocking experience?

It’s understandable this super-power can be frustrating, perhaps dangerous. It’s at least a major inconvenience. However, before you assume your body can generate static electricity using methods unexplainable and unknown to science, you should first look at your environment. Why? Static electricity is everywhere. And under the right conditions, it’s easy to generate.

A case study is reported in The Daily Mall about Mavis Price, the “super-charged grandmother whose touch BLOWS UP kettles”. As we read the story, we find the author embellished the facts a bit, beginning with the title itself. But no matter, let’s examine the story as presented:

“Mavis Price, since the 1950s, has had the unusual ability to generate electricity in her body. Her first experience with this ability began, in her words, when she “plugged in a television set and ended up blowing up the television and flying across the room.”

Her static electricity generation symptoms include:

She can’t use a computer, as her static-creating ability interferes with them. As she says in the article:

“I went on an IT course, but it was a nightmare because every time I touched the computer it would either freeze or shut down.”

Her household appliances have a very short lifespan. As the article says:

“She estimates she has destroyed 15 kettles in the last few years. Housework has also become a problem, with 20 irons and ten vacuum cleaners biting the dust after falling foul of her apparently supercharged touch.”

The symptoms aren’t confined only to her house. The article gives several examples of her being outside of home and experiencing shocks and higher-than-usual static electricity buildup. The “facts” are either largely subjective or unverifiable, but it’s clear Ms. Price does have problems with static electricity.

How to generate static electricity

How does a human body generate static electricity? There are many factors increasing static electricity generation, including:

  • Wearing certain clothing (including shirts, jackets, pants and shoes). Wool, rubber, fleece, vinyl and synthetic materials increase the effect.
  • Having a house without grounded outlets, or having a house with bad wiring
  • Walking a certain way. Shuffling and dragging one’s feet will increase electrostatic buildup.
  • The humidity of where one lives. The lower the humidity, the better the conditions are for static generation.
  • As well as general humidity, having unusually dry skin may increase the ability to store static electricity.
  • Most any time an object moves against another object. The object types and surrounding environment will determine how much static electricity is generated. As anyone with a balloon knows, it’s very easy to do, as in these simple science lab experiments involving static electricity.

Testing people for static electricity generation and dispersal

Let’s assume the electrostatic generation ability is true as reported. Or at least, assume the symptoms are true, and that Mavis Price generates more static electricity than a normal person.

This is the fun part. We get to test.

1) Get a multimeter. This will allow us to not only measure the static buildup in her body, but also measure the “zap” when she touches a grounded piece of metal. It would be interesting to see if the measurement is truly beyond any normal person’s ability to generate static electricity, or if another person in the same conditions can produce the same measurements.

2) Strip Ms. Price naked. …Okay, maybe that’s a little extreme, and probably not very appreciated by Ms. Price herself. However, clothing greatly contributes to static electricity buildup. Particularly footwear. If you’re generating static electricity and you’re walking around in woolen slippers on a thick shag carpet, don’t be surprised. Now, take off the slippers. Walk around on a hardwood floor in bare feet. Examine the clothing as well as the shoes: is wool, fleece or synthetic material being worn? Remove those and test again. Or, if walking around unclothed isn’t acceptable, wear cotton instead.

3) Examine how you walk: When you walk, do your legs (and clothing) rub together? Are you shuffling your feet? Both methods will increase static buildup.

4) Measure the humidity: the drier it is, the more likely you’ll have problems with static electricity. Install a humidifier. And crank it up. Increase the humidity in the air and see if the symptoms still persist.

5) Examine the house electrical wiring. I’ve saved this for last, but I think it’s definitely a factor here. While some combination of the above reasons contribute to the “human static generator”, we should focus particular attention on the house wiring. I say this because:

She apparently has destroyed dozens of irons, kettles and vacuum cleaners. Such devices are pretty simple and robust, and should not be effected by static electricity. Yet they’ve all been plugged into her house wiring.

The article insinuates she’s lived in the house for a very long time. The wiring is probably old, and in need of repair or not grounded. Either issue could lead to small appliances (including computers) having short lifespans.

Conclusion

It’s probable her house has electrical problems. She also probably lives in a dry environment and wears clothing or shuffles her feet excessively when she walks, contributing to static buildup. A change in environment and behavior are in order, as well as a call to an electrician. It’s telling when the article has quotes like this:

“I am just an electrifying person really, who seems to build up an unusual amount of static,” she said. “People have suggested going to the doctor, but I don’t know what they would be able to do.”

This is a refusal to look critically at a problem, and an assumption that an untested pseudo-scientific explanation is the answer. The results are a lifetime of damaged electrical equipment and painful constant shocks, all without any effort made to stop them or find out the cause.

As for Ms. Price, a call to a doctor may not be the first step. It would be better to speed-dial an electrician. Ms. Price says:

“No one has ever been able to offer me an explanation to why this happens to me.”

Explanations in this case are easy, but it seems Ms. Price has no motivation to find the answer.



Other articles related to this topic:

140 Comments
2008 February 26

Well several comments:
First, you can not measure static charge with a multimeter. You need a surface voltmeter. Simply stated the energy is insufficient to activate a multimeter, ignoring that a digital MM will fry.

I think that the European equipment is generally more sophisticated than the US one. And thus, a kettle may contain electronics that tells it when to turn on or off, a vacuum cleaner may have variable speed, etc. Static charges can kill such devices.

As for the house wiring – while possible, I note that it is the United Kingdom. Their electrical standards are several orders of magnitude ahead of the US electrical standards. They use generally excellent wiring, and had significant electrical inspections for a long time, at a level that simply does not exist in US homes. I am not certain how that such fault would work. Clearly, lack of grounding can not – by itself – kill a purely motorized or resistive device. If one assume bad contacts, 1) wouldn’t it be visible elsewhere?, and 2) by now, that bad contact would have burned itself to crisp over the years.

So I suspect that it is her clothing, and possibly super dry skin.

A humidifier is an expensive solution – you need to drive the relative humidity to about 40%. To do so to a whole house you need a BIG humidifier.

However, I wanted to introduce another solution: The StaticOff device shown in http://www.staticoff.com will allow a person to discharge painlessly just by touching any touch- point. After such discharge, I am certain that it will take even Ms. Price some time to recharge, during which she will be able to do what she needs to do without killing her devices. This device is unique in the market.

Full disclosure: I am the inventor and CEO of StaticOff.

Shalom Wertsberger

2008 March 18
Secret Agent Man permalink

“Simply stated the energy is insufficient to activate a multimeter, ignoring that a digital MM will fry.”

Hold on a second here, either it’s enough voltage to fry a multimeter or it’s not enough energy to activate it. You can’t have it both ways.

“A humidifier is an expensive solution – you need to drive the relative humidity to about 40%. To do so to a whole house you need a BIG humidifier.”

That’s an odd claim, as a whole house humidifier can be added to most forced air heating systems for a few hundred dollars. By the time you’ve purchased and installed 30 to 40 $10.00 light switch plates you could have installed a whole house humidifier that draws water directly from you water line. The whole house humidifier has the advantage of making your skin and nasal passages more comfortable on top of reducing static electricity. The “Staticoff” wall plates can’t make the same claim.

As for the device being unique, a competing company makes a hand held version that can be taken anywhere and attached to a lanyard. You could even wear a watch with a metal strap and tap that against a grounded surface to get a painless static discharge.

2008 March 19
Kathleen permalink

I know exactly what Ms. Price is talking about. Both myself and my sister do this and more. I turn off street lights at night – in other words the main lamp thinks its daylight. I’ve crashed the operating system in computers 1/2 a dozen times in a year or 2 and crashed the computer thousands of times. I’ve taken out hard drives, rams, etc. in printers, computers (including lap tops), brand new computerized tills, debit machines, etc. A friend of mine is a psychologist and he used his galvanic skin resistance test machine on me and had never seen anything like what I made that machine do. So for all of you who think that humans don’t emit “special energy” that is not necessarily static (cause I’ve rarely been shocked myself – although I have shot out flairs that have been many inches in length). My sister kills more machinery than I have – I do more computers (although I have killed my vacuum) – she kills household appliances. No Ms. Price – you’re not nuts. There was a teacher in a special computer college who knew exactly about this issue. Some people emit a strong opposite polarity to others. Those of us that emit this opposite polarity cause this issue. When I took my daughter to the college because she wanted to take training in computer graphics, I walked by a young man doing a program (and almost completed) that set up a complete football stadium. I eliminated the entire thing off his computer when I walked by it. He freaked. The teacher looked at me and very casually walked by the computer in the opposite direction and it magically reappeared. No this is not BS. He and I discussed the issue at great length afterward. I knew I’ve been able to do this for many years but no one had ever been able to give me an explanation. He says he’s come across about 10% or less of the population that deals with computers had this to very degrees. So mine has been varified by electronic equipment (I do create significant energy charge), we do kills computers, programs, etc., and any type of equipment that is electrically driven.

2008 March 27

Looks like we have X-Mens and Sith Lords in our midst. Be afraid. Be very afraid… LOL! ;-D

2008 March 31
Phaeton permalink

Sorry for my bad English.
I have same problem. It’s much stronger on spring. For example,Yesterday when I was at McDonalds. 1. On exit I was shocked by the door of my car. When I was paying for meal I shoked employee with my hand. It was so strong that she recoiled. Then I went on exit door and door handle shoked me. Later at home light bulb burnout when I tryed to turn lihts on… Coincidence???
It is just one day of my life with static electricity. I am thing of wearing rubber gloves but people would say that I’m out of my mind so I suffer every single day. It’s painfull to open doors with metal handle, car doors and so on. When I dischardge it lasts for about 3 or 5 minutes maximum.

2008 April 2
achein permalink

just wanted to share – i’ve stopped every battery powered watch i’ve worn. i gave up wearing one at age 13 and haven’t tried since. the first few times, we replaced the battery. it would take about a week to two weeks for it to stop completely and if i stopped wearing it for a while (days to weeks) it would start working again. this happened with at least five different watches over many years. Since it would happen any time of the year, in any weather, i don’t think it had anything to do with my shoes or dragging my feet.

recently, i found out that my uncle has the same problem

2008 April 3

All claims and no proof. Nice try, but it’s not that simple…

2008 April 3

Phaeton and Achein and Kathleen,

What testing have you performed to verify your body is generating this static electricity, and your environment is not? For example, my own car has bad static shielding – It shocks me all the time. I have a streetlight outside my house that flickers and turns off whenever I walk underneath it. My home television antenna reception quality decreases greatly when I walk towards our TV. All attributable to my environment and faulty electronics.

As for other claims like “shooting out flares many inches in length”, disabling computers without touching them, regularly killing household appliances… You’d better get yourselves to a science lab, apply for the Randi million-dollar prize before it’s ended, or start using your massive energy generation abilities to save on home electricity costs. Think of the money you could make. Think of the massive scientific advances you could spearhead to help mankind. Think of how you can use this ability to help others. If greed, altruism, goodwill and fame aren’t enough motivators, then I have to conclude that you’re either mistaken about your situation, or, frankly, lying.

2008 April 3

I concur.

2008 April 3

To add one more thing to the conversation: I did email James Randi to see if he’s run into “human static electricity generators” in the past. He has. His comment:

“Yes, I’ve seen a few of them. Simply changing their footwear always ‘cures’ the problem.”

This seems to indicate that, from what Randi’s seen, the issue is caused more by normal static electricity buildup than by any special powers.

So, for anyone interested in testing if this phenomenon is real: take a close look at the feet!

2008 April 7
New 2 me permalink

Searching the internet I was trying to find out what to do about all my *episodes. I too have not been able to wear watches for as long as I know. However, I started noticing the big/ costly problems start 6 or so years ago. Numerous appliances, Tons of light bulbs have popped, blow-dryer, flat iron, a couple alarm clocks, a few cell phones, I tried a watch (waste of money, at least the time was right twice a day!) Surround sound player, TV,… I could go on. Today I went to lunch and found out three of my credit cards were declined; knowingly having the money on there I insisted they try and try and try again, still declined. Came home and checked balances online and sure enough they were fine. Called one of the companies, they stated I demagnetized them, question for the ones who know about this stuff, is this static related too?

I am interested in the steps for testing to make sure I reduce the amount of static I endure.

1. How would I encounter a multimeter/ voltmeter?
2. I am constantly wearing this grubby pair of slippers; however, they are Victoria Secrets Pink COTTON slippers
3. My legs do not rub together; however, when it is cold and I am at home I tend to wear baggy clothing. I’ll be more cautious about that
4. We have a couple humidifiers already “cranked up”, not related to static, but coinciding
5. As far as wiring, I have moved three times, currently unpacking from the last move from April 1st. Location does not matter, this occurs at other environments, parents homes, friends homes, however, mine is the worst, maybe it is because I am here the most too!

Basically, I know I am not a super woman. I am just trying to seek advice being a single mom of a 6 year old is hard enough, now I have to deal with all these cost of replacements. I try keeping these under warranty or extended warranty, but this should somehow be resolvable. I am afraid to do my hair. I recently fried my cell phone and Verizon said they had not seen anything like it, had to go w/o a phone for 3 days. These are all inconvenience.

Help needed!

2008 April 11

New 2 me,

I’d start simple before working with multimeters. Go with what Randi alluded to: What happens when you change your footwear? Go barefoot. Then wear shoes with a rubber sole. How do these change your experience?

2008 April 11

I hope this is not just some creative deception to simply waste our time. Some people get the kick watching skeptics crack their heads to figure out made up stuffs like this while laughing at us…

2008 April 17
Kathleen permalink

To those non-believers – whatever! No! I’m not lying. My energy has been documented by a psychologist using a galvanic skin resistance monitor. And I’m sorry, but unless we’re in the dark ages of Fred Flinstone with a foot powered car – I don’t shuffle my feet when I’m driving my vehicle which has the proper static equipment. My house is typically at around 30-40% humidity due to the quantity of plants I have and if not I use a humidifier. As mentioned, I’m not the only one that does this in my family. We’re not special, unusual or abnormal – as the computer expert noted, about 10% of the general population has this reverse polarity thing as he described it. And that is documented. Human energy is also very well documented both electricly and through special cameras. Reiki has been used for healing for 1000′s of years and that uses energy. I am a scientist actually and I deal in facts. I can’t always explain what is going on since my science isn’t physics (my science specialties deal more with chemistry and biology), however there are many physicists that have documented this energy. The one thing I would like to see is if companies like Microsoft could build some sort of safety measure into their system to stop the numerous crashes that are caused to computer equipment by myself and 10% of the population since not only is it bothersome, but due to down time with our company, its extremely expensive and time consuming. For those non-believers, maybe they need to read a few more physics science journals. For the lady that can’t find a solution to her problem, I’m sorry I can’t provide a solution (I wish I could because it does cause serious problems in our everyday lives). All I can offer is support from someone else that has suffered with this same issue for upwards of 40+ years. If there are any scientists out there that are interested in conducting research on this, as a fellow scientist, I would be more than happy to oblige. I’m sure that you wouldn’t have any problem finding willing subjects since most of us would love to find a method of mitigating the more serious side effects. Shutting off street lights I personally find amusing although from time to time it has been a bit troublesome. Its the more serious issues of shutting down bank instant teller machines, our company computer systems and shooting electricity from ones fingers at people and things that are far more serious. And for those that think rubber mats, cotton clothing, static mats, static guards, higher humidity, properly grounded electrical systems, etc. are mitigation tools to this issue – dream on! I’ve spent far too much money on money wasting devices that are supposed to stop “static”. Its not necessarily static. Just because its energy doesn’t mean its static. In the past year alone I’ve crashed the operating system on my main company computer twice and Microsoft and Norton have had to re-install the programs via the internet since (with great difficulty) since we were not able to do it from this end (for reasons unknown to us all). Yes its a mystery. Is it a lie. No. Both my sister and I have numerous friends that can attest to this weird phenomenon that afflicts upwards of 10% of the population to some degree. To those non-believers, go to the University library and read up a bit on physics that deals in energy.

2008 April 18

Kathleen,

You still haven’t answered any of the questions I raised above, just gave more examples of your powers and how they affect your life.

>To those non-believers, go to the University library
>and read up a bit on physics that deals in energy.

What kind of energy are you referring to here? There’s many different kinds. You seem to indicate your power isn’t with static electricity. What energy type do you claim you have? Kinetic? Heat? Mechanical? Photosynthesis? Gravitational? Sound? Chemical?

You’re giving a lot of symptoms without any scientific detail, assuming we should just “read up a bit” on some vague, undefined form of energy that you say you have, others have supposedly measured, but no one can define. Again, I stand by the last paragraph I wrote to you, Phaeton and Achein above.

2008 April 18

Yep! That’s quite a common thing by claimers… ;-)

2008 April 18
Mac permalink

Ok you people don’t kow the half of it! I have been living with this problem for years and it just gets worse and stronger. First stuff would short out lights would flash dim or burn out completly (and home school and work) there was a street light on the way to work whenever i walk by it it would shut down when i was about 10 ft passed it, it would turn back on…every day for 3 years! Others have witnessed this..there was a time where the lights in my car all went nuts for a few minutes until i got out of the car my friends were with me…needles to say they were a lil freaked. But these days it worse metal shocks me, other people, plastic yes plastic..cloth…wood…i am freakin afraid to touch anything…i mean these are mean crackling visible shocks mini blue bolts or electricity…don’t get me wrong if i could control it would be cool but i can’t…i mean i could probably light a cigerette with some of the electricity i produce or absorb whichever…ive changed shoes clothes fabric softners, static guards, you name it …. i can stand on a wooden surface touch something and get shocked not move then touch something else and get shocked again….to tell you the truth it really pisses me off. Im not claiming to have powers or anything just living proof that the human body is capable of carry a powerful electic charge or atleast manipulating it involinatry or not.

2008 April 18
Mac permalink

Oh and light switches and power outlets….now thats the worst ..that sucker just jump to my hand before i even touch the damn things…..needless to say i don’t touch em anymore…i use a glove if im at home but if im out i just avoid them.. I am not a fake…i don’t know why this is happening to me….i am more than appy to offer some time of proof…if anyone can offer some kind of medical or scientific explantation besides “oh its just static…blah blah blah..change ur shoes” beleive you me these kinds of shocks want to make me rip my hair out!!!

2008 April 19

Yet, more claims and no proof… doesn’t anyone read Andy’s requests and the questions put out?

2008 April 20
Mac permalink

dammit i fried another cell phone…why me

2008 April 21

I guess not…

2008 April 21

I think the last sentence of the original article says it all – complaining is easy; no one has the motivation to actually research and find the cause and solution.

2008 May 13
ALLis0NE1111 permalink

People with lots of static charge in their body.. you may not know this but your diet has a lot to do with the energy levels in your body too. The food’s you eat could make you more prone to static charge. I highly suggest you people with the same phenomenon get together and figure out the simularitys of your diet. When the entire family households have the same problem, it is usualy because they eat the same food.

2008 May 13

Please do tell me what are the foods that can generate electricity in me. I really want this power! LOL! ;-D

2008 May 15
Kathleen permalink

In reply again!!! For all of you non-believers, put your money where your mouth is. I’m in no financial position to pay the kind of dollars that a research study of this nature costs. Either put up or shut up. There are a lot of us, as I’ve already mentioned about 10% of the population, that has this issue. All humans have energy – its what supports our life. Some of us however seem to “leak” it more than others for reasons that are presently “yes” not well understood or documented but they are documented. I am a scientist. But I do not have the time nor the money to waste trying to get skeptics to believe something that they obviously don’t suffer from. Its not my shoes nor the lack thereof, its not my clothing or the lack thereof. Rubber gloves, static guards, etc. do not aleviate the issue. If you skeptics need so bad to see the evidence then bloody well pay for it or shut the heck up. Those of us that suffer from this have too much going on to waste out time with the likes of you. Again – pay up (for a research study which will cost a minimum of $100K) or shut up. This is the last I have to say on the issue. And, if you read my last replies, my issue was scientifically documented by a psychologist on a special meter. No I do not have this information to supply to the general public. It was for his study purposes.

2008 May 15
Nowhere permalink

“my issue was scientifically documented by a psychologist on a special meter”

That wasn’t a psychologist, it was a Scientologist. You heard him wrong. The “Special Meter” was an e-meter and has NOTHING to do with static electricity issues.

Besides, why would a psychologist be involved in measuring the static charge in a human being? You have a lot of terms messed up. I’ll bet you’re just a nutter who wears a lot of polyester and refuses to admit your clothing could have ANYTHING to do with it.

2008 May 15

Hi Kathleen,

I think you’re confusing healthy skepticism with accusations. You’re also misrepresenting the burden of proof: if you’re going to claim something, we have no obligation to believe you or pay for your $100K research study – it’s up to you to prove your claim.

Also note that there are plenty of organizations who will validate/invalidate your claims for low cost or free. The New England Skeptical Society and the CSICOP and (if you’ve already been in the media) the JREF come to mind.

If, as you insinuate, you have a power beyond the known laws of physics, fine. But don’t expect to be taken seriously unless you can prove it.

2008 May 21
Mac permalink

So I have taken it apon myself to try and find the real cause of the “electrical energy” we seem to be plagued by, trying te usual again way we walk, what we wear, shoes, gloves, electrical issues around the house…none of that made any differnce what so ever. I have a healthy diet…(stay away from fast food..blah)….so I don’t think food has anything to do with it..because most of that energy is converted and used up by the immune and nervouse systems. However I have found those of us who suffer more stress tend to get “shocked” more often. Recently many things have changed my life for the better, honestly I have never been happier so my stress has almost completly disasappered….I started to noticed I was getting shocked less and less. Now it may be infrequent but it is still there, it will never truly be gone..but atleast now it is more managable. I believe the stress we let our daily lives create and the stress of these “electrical occurences” is too much and we overload causing large (compared to the average person) amounts of energy to disperse. This makes more sense than many of your sceptic theories as I suffer from this..I may not have the answers yet but I am trying…and if at the least make it so others can cope with this.
Evolution perhaps….or just freak occurences who knows. By the way I have bought a new phone and hope this one doesn’t fry like the last 2 (warranty)..recently I have been experimenting with deep meditaion trying focus the body’s energy to see if there some type of control for these occurences. I will let you know how that turns out.

2008 May 27
stan permalink

I have a partner in my business who can crash a certain computer application just by standing near it,He can go to each terminal in turn and they all crash or hang.The computer screen has certain sections that fade and comeback when he stands near.We have both touch screens and lcd and all do the same.Windows operating system is still working in the back ground,just the application that is running.We thought bluetooth on mobile phone, but other staff (10 of us)have got it but don’t affect the computer.We put earth strip by computer for him to touch but it made no difference.Doesn’t do it with his laptop or his computer at home.Either he has these energy powers or he has something in his pocket which we know not of.Perhaps the sceptics can inform me of a device that can do these things as mischief can’t be completely ruled out.

2008 May 27

I suppose evolution has made creatures like the electric eel to produce a discharge of up to 650 volts, enough to stun a human being. Some insects also produce light. Perhaps, humans can evolve to generate electricity and produce light as well. However, we do need strong evidence that what is claimed are in fact real, and not just made up or confused declarations…

Nick

2008 May 27

Stan,

Your coworker doesn’t have any magical electro-static charge. The computers are crashing because the moron wears magnets, you know, the ones dippy hippies think will balance their Chi or some such nonsense. They’re just strong enough to interfere with computer operation at close range. I’ll bet he doesn’t wear the magnets at home, which is why his laptop is OK.

Then again, you could just be an idiot looking for patterns where there aren’t any. It could just be that the application is unstable and you happen to notice the coworker around when it crashes. The times it crashes without him around are mentally written off or ignored.

2008 May 27

Stan,

You mentioned an “earth strip”. I don’t know what this is. Can you elaborate?

Doesn’t do it with his laptop or his computer at home. Either he has these energy powers or he has something in his pocket which we know not of. Perhaps the sceptics can inform me of a device that can do these things as mischief can’t be completely ruled out.

I think the fact that the problem doesn’t happen with his home equipment is a nice indicator you’re being tricked in some way.

As for devices to cause problems, I’d need to know more about the symptoms, as well as your work environment. But based on what you said so far (about screens fading in/out), that sounds exactly like the effects you’d see from a magnet. Either a strong simple magnet, or an electromagnet (which would work at a much greater range, and could be turned on and off covertly). Note that magnets can also cause permanent damage to monitors. Your coworker could be held liable.

2008 May 27
stan permalink

Definately not imagination, we are in a shop and and we have no problems whatsoever with any of the staff using the computers as they are used as a point of sale retail system.Only get problems with the one person.The earth strip was a length of aluminium foil attached in front of the till draw with a wire to ground(earth) so he put his hand on it before using keyboard or touch screen and the pos application froze.We use one computer as the server with 4 others hard wired (networked together) If he crashes the application on the server we can still use the other teminals to do transactions.So the network still works as does SQL on the server.Sometimes the pos application program just shuts off to leave the desktop when he is near.
how many magnets and at what distance would cause an effect

2008 May 28

how many magnets and at what distance would cause an effect

I’ve seen chaos like that caused by those idiotic magnetic bracelets people wear for their circulation. I’ve also seen refrigerator magnets on the side of a computer case cause issues. While computers are designed to handle such minor magnetic fields, customized cases, poorly designed cases or even an improperly attached motherboard can all make the PC vulnerable. There are even some older Pacemaker and cell phone models that interfere with cheaper PC hardware, particularly poorly shielded CRT monitors.

It could also be his clothing. Some cloth combinations can build up static while sitting still typing. The minor movements of the arms can, with the right clothing combination, build up enough charge to shock. One of my fleece shirts, combined with the wrong t-shirt, can make my fingers spark if I wear it in dry weather, and that’s just from sitting around. His clothing could be building up a charge through his movement, which is then discharged through the keyboard.

2008 June 14
stan permalink

problems above all caused by mischief with car remote immobiliser/alarm key fob

2008 June 15

Mac,

You’re probably frying cell phones because of faulty / poor wiring in your home. Try using a decent surge suppressor when you plug it in to charge it. Have an electrician inspect your wiring.

A cell phone damaged by a power surge while charging can fail later during use. Damaged parts may last until put under the strain of actively broadcasting a call to a tower.

2008 June 16

I have LYME disease and have developed this static electricity thing. I zap my dog all the time and I can see the spark fly out of my fingers. I get a shock when I touch water from the faucet. I can not touch my mouse as it shorts out . I watch it fly across the screen then I have to reboot. Somewhere I read that lyme people get this problem. It is getting very disturbing. I can touch anything without a spark or zap. I work in a recording studio as well and try to ground myself so I don’t burn up my equiptment.
I had a dream that I was moving stuff around with my electricity. Pointing my fingers and moving stuff at will.. that was pretty cool.
Maybe it is a new thing that will benefit us later when the world gets worse than it is now..

2008 June 16

Adrienne,

I did some research and if you’re experiencing a spike in static electricity in your body after getting infected with LYME then it’s because your pituitary gland is damaged, causing excessive urination, causing dehydration, making you a better conductor.

If what you claim is true it’s because of a medical condition that if left untreated will slowly kill you. It will destroy your ability to function. There’s nothing mystical, para-scientific or paranormal about it. A parasite has damaged part of your body and if you leave this untreated it will kill you.

Get to a doctor before it’s too late.

2008 June 17

That’s a better explanation… I also wonder why all these people are not appearing in TV or in some “New Discovery” program of some kind? Where are all you guys hiding?

2008 June 17

Nick,

It’s amazing how quick people are to jump to claims of magical or paranormal properties when simple, science based answers are readily available. It’s as if they’re afraid to face the prospect of a mundane, even boring solution.

There’s no credible evidence to suggest anyone has any kind of “special” powers when it comes to generating static electricity. In the vast majority of cases it’s because of the clothing combinations people are wearing. They refuse to believe it’s their clothing because they don;t understand the physics of static electricity and only associate static with a very limited number of fabrics.

Faulty wiring is the next cause. Perhaps your outlets are improperly grounded. Perhaps the insulation on some of the wiring is going. Perhaps the power supply to your home is corroded. All of these things are possible explanations for the phenomenon described above.

As for computer crashes, viruses, faulty drivers and an overloaded CPU can all explain that. And yes, there are problems that will cause a computer to crash when a mouse is moved or a key pressed. It’s also common for a PC to be frozen and no one to notice until they try to use it, but then assume it happened when they touched the PC, because that’s when the screen saver was deactivated revealing the damage.

Finally, there’s medicine, real medical conditions that can increase your body’s conductivity, all of which need treatment and indicate more serious problems.

The bottom line is if you get a lot of static shocks, there’s something very, very wrong in your home or your body, you aren’t a mutant or in possession of magical powers.

It doesn’t make you special.

2008 June 17

Yes, of course. It’s not a matter whether someone believes in it or not. It’s not a matter whether it’s real or not. The matter is, there is no clear and concrete evidence that such things exist…

Nick

2008 July 9

It’s funny how the photographer’s digital camera managed to work around the electric gran, and all these people commenting on how they fry electronics have sent in their thought using a computer…
For the record, static is only a problem to electronics when you’re directly touching the circuit board – otherwise the charge is going to remain on the outside of the box…

2008 July 19
Brook permalink

Ok, lets bump the conversation up a node or two. I am 37 yrs. old and have a curse involving much of what has been said above. I do however believe there is documentation, it walks and talks and is me. 5 other people in my family suffer from a similar curse, and I will describe it more fully. I am 37, and have purchased 26 VCR/DVD players in the last 48 months, I have shocked people on the other end of a phone line, and in the dark if I get close to a light switch you can visably see the arc from my finger tip to the lightswitch before I touch it. I dim streetlights when I walk below them, and haven’t been able to wear a watch since I was 13. For awhile pocket watches worked, but as I get older, the effects are more severe. It is real, it is financially cumbersome, and it freaks people out. Imagine walking down the street with a friend and with each streetlight the power dims temporarily and once the distance is great enough it comes back on, until you reach the next light… I worked in a government building several years ago, and in conversation it came up with some friends, a representative from Emergency Services was there and over heard, the next day he brought a seizmograph(sp?) because he didn’t believe me, and it went off. I also can’t use wall testers to find studs, or eletric testers to find live wires because the signal is constant. Yes, I am using a computer to type this message, I’ve learned first to ground myself before touching any electrical equipment, and second it doesn’t happen all of the time, it seems more common when I am angry, or deep in thought etc. I just wanted to respond because there are many people that are different in the world, this is just another (dis)ability.

2008 July 28
MGV permalink

I am so amazingly astonish while reading all your experiences and happy at the same time, as I thought I was the abnormal one. My daughter gave me a watch and within 2 weeks it stopped. I sent it back to her in the Netherlands for her to changes it and guess what, when it reached her it was working. So she sent it back to me, I wear and again it stopped. I went through several ones and when I take it off after awhile and put it in the draw and check it again after 15 minutes, it works. The other day, my hubby was working on the computer, I walk up and check some recipes, when he gets back to the PC, he noticed that the mouse battery is down…He knew right away that I had worked on the PC. Also last week my car did not want to start, the battery. i tried again after 5 minutes and it worked and it is still working, this is a brand new battery. Most of the time, when I walk by a radio or stereo and it’s on, the receiver/sound goes bad, until I walk away, it’s get back to normal. Like most of you say, this has nothing to do with shoes or carpet, because it happens to me everywhere and anytime. Lately it has happened more often.

2008 August 8
richard laffan permalink

every time i go to open the car door i get shocked,and i too have crashed computers.i also give other people shocks which can be annoying.i do have dry skin although i doubt that is soley the cause,also i have shot arcs of electricity between my fingers and metal objects several inches away.

2008 August 9
richard laffan permalink

i must add that this is not a power,more of a hinderance.these charges are generated by friction in movement.i work in a hospital and constantly get and give shocks.the floors are rubberised paint and the shoes we wear are rubber.the charge is generated and carried in the body.it is irrelevent if you do not believe this as scientific study has proved it real.some people are just better conducters than others,it is not a special ability,that’s just stupid.

2008 August 29
david permalink

richard yes ur right i guess its only matter of condactors or not
but still i have a question can we raise our voltage i mean
we have a very evry small voltage in our bopdyu can we rais it??

2008 October 7
Janice permalink

Since I was a child, I have been unable to wear a watch, except for a few years when Casio first came out with electronic watches. Don’t know why those particular watches were OK for me. I now have a pocket watch, which works for about a week, then starts losing time. My husband has an identical watch, and we switch once a week. Once he has the watch in his possession, it starts working perfectly. They are battery-powered pocket watches. When I use tools, such as screwdrivers, they become magnetized, and start picking up iron filings. My father and one of my sons are the same way.

I have become accustomed to always carrying my car/house keys as I approach or leave the car or house. The key always touches the lock before I touch the door handles, thus any static is discharged through the end of the key, rather than through my hand.

I wear cotton clothes and leather shoes. I have wood floors in the house, and no carpeting. The weather is quite dry here, many times being less than 10% RH. However, I grew up in California, where the humidity was fairly high (just a few miles from the ocean), and had the same problem then as now. I do tend to drag my feet a little, but that has mostly been in the last few years.

However, there is one plus side. When I pet my cat in a dark room, the sparks fly everywhere! It is quite amusing. I’ve even seen what looks like really small ball lightning running away from the cat along the floor.

2008 October 7

““I went on an IT course, but it was a nightmare because every time I touched the computer it would either freeze or shut down.””

Sounds like some clients that I work with!

2008 October 15
Luis permalink

well I’m from Australia and I met this person the performer called him self the space cowboy and he could “bend” spoons, of course i was Skeptical many such claims have been made though he claimed he used an electrical current (he generated) to heat the metal and bend them.

If you can do such things please let me know how you do them??
I’m thirsty for this knowledge, to understand

contact me lj.5471@gmail.com

2008 October 18
Cindy permalink

This is interesting. I found this site by trying to figure out why I mess up the TV reception every time I walk into the room. Perhaps that is the reason I don’t like to watch TV very much. It drives my husband nuts, so usually he just watches alone.

Can anyone give me a reasonable explanation for this happening?

As for other symptoms of some sort of “energy” that many have spoke of, I do sometimes shock other people or myself when touching metal, usually, and occasionally some other minor things that I haven’t even considered until reading through all these claims above. I am skeptical as well and think there is some explanation to it but haven’t figured it out yet. I think diet might play into it somehow, and definitely (probably in most cases) shoes, rubbing feet/legs together, carpet, etc. At the moment though I am wearing rubber sandals on a wood floor. However, I don’t shut off any computers or anything that drastic either. Mostly for me it is just the occasional shock (sometimes really bad but nothing major) and messing up the TV/antenna reception. It is usually just for certain channels. If there is a way to correct this problem, I would love to hear how! Or I can figure it out on my own if I just knew what caused it. Help?

2008 November 29
Ann Perkins permalink

My sister fries things. She is a twin. I have a theory about all of this that might shed some light for those professionals that really know what is going on.

In my family (where there are several sets of twins) most all of the women have fibromyalgia. FMS is a syndrome inwhich perhaps 90% of the survivors have thyroid disfunction. It does not matter what type of dyfctunction, but the thyroid does not work properly or its connections.

Now, the thyroid has two major objectives that are real important:
oxytoxin and vasopressin. Vasopressin controls the water in our body and we can’t keep ours where it is supposed to be. Many of us have large water deposits in our legs or stomachs. It is an issue for dryness in our eyes.

If we are all atoms, and we are all cells, then we have to have water in the correct places in order for it to go in and out of our cells properly, especially the brain, and make the neurotransmittors work.

If vasopressin is keeping that from happening, we have major brain FOG.
And, to me, we have electricity problems.

I would think that the thyroid of these people needs to be checked very carfully…… and the amount of water that is in their body. If humidity is one factor on the outside, imagine the static without humidity, inside !

Just a thought

2008 December 1
Ankur Jain permalink

All this is ok..tell me how to get rid of it ????I don’t have this problem upto this degree..I gets mild shock once is a while and its really really annoying.

2008 December 9
Tim Hemmer permalink

Glad its not just me. Was glad to find this site thinking i was going nuts. Im an IT person and have had to many problems with this. Forget watches and have to charge my NEW cell phone at least every other day and i spend avg 20 min day on it.
my boss SAME PHONE doesn`t charge but every other week or so. This pattern has been there since i owned a cell. Plastic wood anything will set off sparks.Metal does it the best though. people are second in line. Nice to meet someone, shack thier hand and jolt them with a nice spark . Good luck to all looking for the answer.I t`s just nice to know i`m not a freak of some kind. Male – 50

2008 December 12
Andrea permalink

Every vehicle that I’ve ever owned has ended up having major electrical problems. I had bought a brand new car and within months I couldn’t drive it at night because the lights would just quit working randomly. I sold it to my cousin and it never once did this to her. The truck I’m driving now has always had electrical issues as well, but not before I owned it, my husbands buddy owned it prior to me. I get zapped by things all the time, doesn’t matter what I’m wearing for clothes and/or shoes, although I do have a few pair of shoes that I won’t even wear because I get zapped beyond belief when I try to wear them. None of my cell phones that I’ve owned have worked right. And I also get zapped by water. I don’t have any issues with computers though.

2008 December 13

It looks like there are a lot of people here using Confirmation Bias to support their claim of having magical electrical properties.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

In psychology and cognitive science, confirmation bias is a tendency to search for or interpret new information in a way that confirms one’s preconceptions and avoids information and interpretations which contradict prior beliefs. It is a type of cognitive bias and represents an error of inductive inference, or as a form of selection bias toward confirmation of the hypothesis under study or disconfirmation of an alternative hypothesis.

Confirmation bias is of interest in the teaching of critical thinking, as the skill is misused if rigorous critical scrutiny is applied only to evidence challenging a preconceived idea but not to evidence supporting it.

2009 January 21
Brenda permalink

Hi all,
After reading all of this artical I see my problem is somewhat minor. I have never in my life been able to wear cheap watches because they stop working after I put them on. (Trash) I thought that was my only problem with this issue until recently.
My sister moved in with me a year ago. My computer was not working properly so she did a system restore that fixed it for awhile. Note: another sister had done about the same thing a year before that. Now, again it happened. This time nothing she did fixed it so we took it to be repaired. It worked in the computer store but when we got it home it started freezing up within 1 hour. We had also bought the 5th mouse in 3 years to see if that was the problem. It went back to the computer store (where it is now) In the meantime my sister knew about the static in my body and what it did to watches, so she started asking me lots of questions. It just did’nt make sense that I never had anything break at my workplace. Where I work on a computer also. I have carpet at home and at work but at work I have one of those mats or carpet savers? It was removed from my desk 2 weeks ago and my computer at work is acting up????? Go figure! I will be getting back to all of you after I get it back and see if buying a mat helps.

2009 January 22

Hi Brenda,

I had two thoughts on what you wrote:

1) If a system restore was what fixed your computer, that’s an indicator that static or electric shocks did NOT cause the problem. It was software: Driver files, software updates, even a virus or spyware. But it wasn’t a physical problem – system restore is for fixing software issues only.

2) You said everything works outside of your house (at the computer store, at your workplace, etc)… that’s sounds like your issue is environment-related, not anything your body is self-generating.

Either way, yes, I’d like to know if purchasing a static-reducing mat helps your situation.

2009 February 5
James B permalink

This has had to be one of the most entertaining reads I happened across in a long time. Rubbish from both sides. I think the only sincere answer was from the person who claimed diet as the culprit, although I don’t agree fully, I do know from studies at my university that water content in the human body has an affect on static electricity production, as does a million other factors (most mentioned here). I would guess that most of the authors have something in common and my next guess would be that they consume alchohol. It’s been known for years that alchohol dehydrates the human body thus causing the strong likelyhood of excess static production (Claimed earlier as dry skin). My suggestion. “Cut down on the bubbly” :-)

2009 February 13
jason r permalink

hi
i am experiencing this shocking problem for the last 3-4 years. But I don’t get charged that often. I get shock when I touch anything metal. But that’s a very negligible shock. I already know this is the static charge but is it anything related to the sensitivity of the skin?
Today, when I got a bigger shock when I touched the running water from a tap. I recoiled instantly and fell down on the floor.
Its so irritating.Is there any way to get over this horrible thing.

2009 February 13

Jason,

I’ll respond to you in the same way I’ve responded to people above:

What testing have you performed to verify your body is generating this static electricity, and your environment is not? For example, my own car has bad static shielding – It shocks me all the time. I have a streetlight outside my house that flickers and turns off whenever I walk underneath it. My home television antenna reception quality decreases greatly when I walk towards our TV. All attributable to my environment and faulty electronics.”

Andy

2009 February 14
Craig permalink

My son, has gone thru 5 cell phones in the last two years, they just freeze and stop working, the mobility dealer can never figure out what is wrong with these phones, he fried my daughter’s x-box, blew the engine in his car….electrical problems with both cars he owned, messed up my pc…we, at first, just teased him saying anything electrical he touches fries! now we are more serious about thi, why everything he touches fries? he had broken a leg about 6 years ago and has a metal rod and pins in his leg, does this have anything to do with it?

Heather

2009 February 15
Kathleen permalink

I don’t know how many times I have to say this – what is being emitted from our bodies and causing this electrical mess up, IS NOT STATIC electricity!!! It’s normal body energy!!! All living organisms have an electrical field/energy which is and has been measured scientifically. Alterations to this field can be caused by changes in body pH, some have an altered field due to body injuries, and some have the ability to alter the field via “mind” forces. Some alter this field via “mind” forces (thought/meditation) unknowingly. In Chinese medicine the energy is called Chi; in Indian medicine they too have a name for it and use the Chakra centres to gain access to specific regions for the purpose of healing, going to higher states of consciousness (Yogi’s),… Those of us who can alter our energy field but have not been trained in controlling it, can do some pretty weird and annoying things – crashing electronic systems such as computers, ATM’s, street lights, radio’s, watches, cell phones – the list is endless. I repeat – this is not static electricity! It is the natural energy that every living organism emits. I shut off street lights, and crash computerized cash registers and computer systems (typically the CPU-I fry it); my sister crashes ATM’s and computerized cash registers; my mother crashes digital watches and makes programs on her computer disappear. I have met many people who talk of the same issues as I – and as I’ve said before in a comment in this blog, a specially trained computer expert, has indicated to me that he has knowledge that it is a polarity issue. I’m not too sure how he came across this deduction, however when I crashed a computer at his college (he is the head professor) during a highly technical program a student was developing, he walked the opposite direction across the front of the computer that I had done, and the program was returned exactly where it had left off. He explained to me later that 10% of the population (scientifically documented) has a reverse polarity to their energy field which affects all electronic equipment (since all electronic equipment is based on the same polarity base). Now unless you’re a physicist or electronics specialist, you likely have no idea what it is I’m talking about, but instead of all those skeptics out there being lazy idiots, why not do some research at your local university before coming across constantly with your ignoramis uneducated statements. Its not voodoo or magic that creates this phenomenon and its not static electricity. Its simple body energy and some of us are better at controlling it than others.

2009 February 15

Kathleen,

You didn’t answer any of the points I raised above:

I think you’re confusing healthy skepticism with accusations. You’re also misrepresenting the burden of proof: if you’re going to claim something, we have no obligation to believe you or pay for your $100K research study – it’s up to you to prove your claim.

Also note that there are plenty of organizations who will validate/invalidate your claims for low cost or free. The New England Skeptical Society and the CSICOP and (if you’ve already been in the media) the JREF come to mind.

If, as you insinuate, you have a power beyond the known laws of physics, fine. But don’t expect to be taken seriously unless you can prove it.

Andy

2009 February 15
Kathleen permalink

Andy,
You obviously didn’t read my entire blog and obviously aren’t willing and possibly incapable of conducting your own reading at the University library. The energy of the human body is well documented in scientific journals – go do your homework!!! A few good places to start are journals on Yoga and Chi and then you can carry forward from that. I’m sure you will find it an interesting read if you can pull yourself away from your computer long enough. The energy has nothing to do with mysticism or fantasy or someones special powers. We ALL have this energy IF we have a pulse and brain wave activity. I am a scientist and I go off facts and I do suffer from excess energy drainage (as I call it). I use the word “suffer” because its a proverbial pain in the backside when you’re trying to do statistical analysis, thesis work, etc. on your computer and your CPU gives ‘way for the 2nd or 3rd time). Do your homework Andy, and when you’ve actually read up on the subject, then come back and discuss it like an educated adult.

2009 February 15

This is your only warning, Kathleen – treat everyone with respect or your comments will be deleted, per the DBSkeptic guidelines.

Due to the nature of this website, there will be a lot of contrasting opinions. That’s healthy. But this will not degenerate into abuse or name-calling.

Now, to address your specific points:

The energy of the human body is well documented in scientific journals

This is good, if you’re saying this energy can be measured. However, you still didn’t answer a question I raised a while ago: “What kind of energy are you referring to here? There’s many different kinds. You seem to indicate your power isn’t with static electricity. What energy type do you claim you have? Kinetic? Heat? Mechanical? Photosynthesis? Gravitational? Sound? Chemical?” If you claim Yoga and Chi are measurable energy sources, how does one measure these? Give me specifics, and I’ll be happy to run an experiment to do so.

A few good places to start are journals on Yoga and Chi

You’ll need to be more specific. The chi concept is too vague the way you’re using it here. What applications do you practice? Chi in acupuncture? Martial arts? Feng shui? How do you personally experience Chi?

t I’m most interested in is to know what *you* think: I’ve asked multiple times for you to define specifically what this energy is, how you can measure it, and how you know it isn’t a product of your environment. Yes, I read what you said about the experiences of you, your mother, your sister and others. But you’re not giving us much to work with. “Reverse electrical polarity” means nothing when dealing with humans, as we most often have a balanced electric charge. But when I press for more detail, you tell us to read a book.

As you know, there are many books about chi by many proponents and critical skeptics. There are many yoga books that talk about yoga energy, and others that simply endorse yoga as great relaxing stretching exercise.

I’m willing to talk about what you think. If you’re just going to refer people elsewhere, fine, but then I don’t understand why you chose to post here in the first place. We’re capable of having a respectful, intelligent discussion, and in contrast to your earlier allusion, my personal understanding of physics and electronics might surprise you. I’d love to talk about your theories at that level.

Andy

2009 February 15
gopi permalink

Kathleen wrote:
“He explained to me later that 10% of the population (scientifically documented) has a reverse polarity to their energy field which affects all electronic equipment (since all electronic equipment is based on the same polarity base). Now unless you’re a physicist or electronics specialist…”
 

While “electronics specialist” is not exactly a formal title, I think that I qualify. I understand electronic components to the level of electron and hole flow in doped semiconductors.
 

Can you refer me to a specific scientific reference for the 10% reverse polarity number? I understand that I may not have the background information necessary to fully understand the paper – but that’s my job to sort out.
 
I’m sure that I will have other questions in the future, but I’d like to stick to the 10% reverse polarity question for now.

2009 February 18
Anna permalink

With regards to Kathleen,

I am a Physicist who has worked in electronics, though that is not my specialty, and I have no idea what you’re talking about. This “Chi” energy, as you call it, is not a field studied in modern physics. This said, I have met many people who claim that body energy exists, and I am open to the concept. I am curious as to what a formal study would turn up. But please don’t call it a “physics” thing, because it’s not.

As to the main topic: static electricity as generated by humans-

I also have been a sufferer, but not to such an extreme as the woman in the article claims. I’ve always gotten nasty shocks from metal, and from talking with people, beyond what is common. It got worst in college, during an electronics course. I couldn’t touch anything in the room without being shocked. I burnt out a signal generator and an oscilloscope before my professor gave me a grounding wire. The problems stopped then. There are, however, two factors to consider. It was an electronics room, so the humidity was kept very low. Also, I had begun wearing a fleece coat, which as someone mentioned earlier, can pass on charge.

Now, I probably get shocked about as regularly as anyone else. I wear mostly cotton, and I make sure to ground myself frequently. No more burned out electronics, though I’m still leery of working on them.

From the little research I have done, I think the problem is caused largely by dry skin, which can be genetic, explaining the family ties. Then, of course, there’s the clothing you wear, humidity of your environment, etc, which can make a small problem much much worse.

2009 February 22
Diane R permalink

i always pass by street lights and they just turn off.When i touch stuff theres a spark whats Up with That?

2009 February 22

Diane,

This was addressed earlier in the conversation: it’s a combination of static electricity and faulty electronics.

Andy

2009 February 23
Diane R permalink

Thank you for the info,so i take it this can happen away from the house? like driving down the street in my car,stoping at a stop sign,and seeing the street lights go off,or my car just dieing? Oh well i guess thats life full of shocking surprizes!

2009 March 3
Ian permalink

Wow…

What are the odds that so many people with this “magical power” showed up to the same website? Frankly, I think that these claims are being somewhat exaggerated, particularly by the woman who calls herself Kathleen. Two possibilities: a.) She suffers from schizophrenic delusions (which explains why she says a psychologist measured her “magical power”), or b.) She’s lying/exaggerating/pulling our legs.

Another thing I don’t like about her posts is that she keeps referring others to unnamed, vague sources, rather than providing us with specific names of books/articles where we can find the pertinent information. It’s really quite an insult. It’s like saying, “I can’t be bothered with you. Go somewhere else to get your information.” Quite rude, really.

For everyone else who thinks they have some sort of magical power: Read Andy’s comments! He’s explained it several times, yet people are obviously incapable of reading anything before writing a comment. You do not have special powers! I promise!

2009 March 4
Demolishun permalink

I have experienced both static electricity and the energy Kathleen calls chi. However, the extent that I have experienced the latter has been a much smaller magnitude. They are not one in the same.

Chi energy seems to be more body generated and is studied a lot in the eastern medicine. I would not be surprised if an eastern scientist has figured out how to measure it. As for western physics the scientists have already figured out all there is to know. Another form of energy would not be possible even if the entire world provided evidence supporting its existence. I have known too many “experts” in the scientific fields that will not expand their knowledge beyond the printed books. This frustrates me as I am an electronics engineer by trade and seeing others’ inability to learn or imagine new concepts make me sad. You don’t have to have evidence to explore the “why” or the “what if”.

On the anecdotal side I work with a gal that claimed to affect electronics in a strange way. I accepted her belief but was skeptical. A few months later I had a workstation with a video card that was starting to fail. I had other cards on order until I could replace it. The video card was functioning mostly normal. Then this gal walked past the workstation and the video went screwy big time. It remained that way until she left the area. Me and another coworker tried walking past the workstation several times. We stomped on the floor, shuffled our feet, etc. We could not repeat what had just happened when this gal walked past. The workstation itself is encased in metal and any static buildup could not do what we saw. Neither could a magnet. The distance would have been too great and fields too weak. She does not shock people when she shakes hands with them. There is something I cannot observe going on here. She wears all cotton clothes as required by her job, and she wears standard leather boots issued to everyone at work. We go to great lengths here to make sure we do not wear clothes that buildup static. Otherwise we get Alpha particles attached to our clothing and set off alpha radiation alarms.

After replacing the video card in the workstation the phenomenon disappeared. There is definitely something strange going on as this woman will cause other systems to go awry according to her experiences.

I fully expect an ignorant response from a number of people here. However, the fact remains that not everything can be easily explained away with our current accepted understanding of the universe.

Kathleen,
Don’t take any comments here personally. People go through life with differing experiences and will believe what they want to believe. Always questioning and always exploring new possibilities as to “how things are” is better than being lead down a path of accepted/printed possibilities. It is the people who dare to think differently that are the most ridiculed in this world. You are in good company, as those who dared are those who are remembered.

2009 March 5
Kathleen permalink

Thank you for your reply Demolishun. It was both greatly appreciated and came at a good time. These replies that have been coming from the skeptics have really been hard for me to take and I’m assuming that others in my circumstance haven’t been getting involved much because they don’t want to become part of this slam dunk the odd person out. It is amazing how those of us that don’t fit the norm get picked on. Yes its part of human nature, but… that doesn’t make it right in this day and age when we are supposed to NOT be neanderthals.

As per the information is known to those in the field of physics as per an earlier blog. I actually had a physics teacher in the late 70′s that had been a physics professor at a University. When we were studying electricity, he told us in class about the 2 different types of energy that people personally experience – static and then what Eastern Medicine refers to as Chi. Reikki was not known to the western world at that time (or at least not to the extent it is today) so it wasn’t mentioned during our in class conversation but he did delve into the subject a great deal and mentioned that at that time there was a lot of research being conducted on the subject because it has the potential to interupt with electronic security systems, and the such. They were even doing a lot with it in the form of biofeedback which is now presently being used to cure some illnesses. I have no idea how it all works out because I have far to much research of my own to do without getting into that. The field of science had more liberty to delve into the unusual back in the 70′s because it was within the budgets of the government to fund such things (where it is not today). Funding really started to dry up in the early 80′s. Its nice to have met (even though through a blog), another electronics professional that has witnessed this energy in action. The shortcomings of this energy is actually the reason I did not become a computer graphics professional (because I an artist on the side) but instead became an environmental scientist. My energy interferes with computer systems far too much to be able to utilize them to the extent that the previous professional desire would have required. As per your story of the video card replacement, once we replaced the internal components of the computer I presently use, I have had limited issues with it, however the other 2 computers that I use (one daily and the other periodically), both still have serious issues. One I have replaced 50% of the inerds and the second we haven’t replaced anything. It appears as though the energy gains access to the electrical system via “flaws”. There is some good preliminary evidence supporting my theory – when the internal circuitry components of our companies computer systems were completely replaced, the issues disappeared; when partially replaced, the issue remained – there remained an open circuit within the system.
Again, thanks so much for your reply. The support is greatly appreciated.

2009 March 5
Demolishun permalink

Some things that may be considered is things that act as antennas or frequencies that interfere. Even harmonics could come into play. However it would take a strong field to get through the shielding around most computers. This leads me to believe it is not what I would term hertzien at all. I would guess it is something more like Tesla discovered which is a longitudinally aligned wave. Some people call these scalar waves. This is where the magnetic field is not perpendicular to the flow of current but aligned along the flow. Kind of hard to visualize, but the best explanation I have heard. Others have theorized that it is a fluctuation of time and space thus could penetrate shielding easily. The circuit it would affect would effectively need to be a able to capture a scalar wave using either traces or silicon that resembles an inductor that is not polarized. Basically and coil wound so that if it were energized it would not create a magnetic field. You can search the web and since you are unusually strong in your “energy” you may be able to construct such a coil or inductor and connect it to a meter and see if you can get some reading from it. I think I have seen some called “caduceus” coils. They are simple to build.

All of this is theory, but it may be fun to play around with. You may need to amplify the signal from the coil and there are probably dozens of circuits on the web that you could choose from. Best best would be an instrumentation op-amp to reduce noise from other sources.

Another device could be a unijunction transistor wired with an led and a 9V battery with the base unconnected. This has been used to detect static electricity and could be a “flawed” circuit to play with.

Whatever you do have fun with it. Trying to understand that nature of the universe is half the reason we went to school anyway. I love exploring things and seeing what happens. Ooh, get a crystal ear phone from Radio Shack and use that with the caduceus coil. Those things are extremely sensitive and will allow you to “hear” any energy that may be being produced.

I wired up some coils one time to create an array of coils and was able to walk around the house listening to electrical noise with the crystal ear phone. I could even hear the battery powered clocks on the wall. Fun stuff.

Get some foam balls that people use for packing and tie them to strings. Then attach them to a stick near each other. If you bring a part of your body close to both of them your static charge will cause them to take on the charge and repel each other. You know, like charges repel.

When people give you crap, just tell them you have an electric personality and smile. :) People say all sorts of things, but it is our job to “love them anyway”.

2009 March 5
Demolishun permalink

One more thing Kathleen, if you want to discuss this offline then visit http://www.demolishun.com and create an account. Then I will send you my email address.

2009 March 5
Demolishun permalink

Oh, here is a taste of what I am talking about in case you think this is crack talk:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7akUQ9luhw&feature=channel_page

2009 March 8
Damien permalink

It is actually possible for some people’s body electricity to interfere with electronic devices. However, it is not usually as extreme as things blowing up. Everyone’s body electricity has a different “frequency” or “electric signature” I suppose it can be called, and some people’s “frequency” or “electric signature” CAN cause strange errors or completely interfere with some electronic devices.

I have talked with an acquaintance of mine, who says that her father’s electricity used to interfere with electrical currents in some places, although as he got older it did not interfere as much. Also, I personally cannot wear a watch, because they become out of sync immediately. I have also experienced many problems with other electronic devices, and only certain ones will remain unaffected (or, at least, not greatly affected.)

While I do not believe it is possible to blow things up just by touching them (although it may be possible that someone’s body electricity interferes with the heat transfer in some electronics, causing them to overheat more quickly…), I do believe it is possible for some people’s body electricity to interfere with electronic devices.

2009 March 8

Damien,

I said this multiple times above, but it also pertains to you:

What testing have you performed to verify your body is generating this static electricity, and your environment is not? For example, my own car has bad static shielding – It shocks me all the time. I have a streetlight outside my house that flickers and turns off whenever I walk underneath it. My home television antenna reception quality decreases greatly when I walk towards our TV. All attributable to my environment and faulty electronics.

Andy

2009 March 9
Demolishun permalink

This discussion got me thinking this weekend. I even threw together a simple and working Van De Graaff Machine. This led me to the “triboelectric effect” and what materials readily give or take charge. It is very interesting and could help separate static charge causing agents from “other” energy sources.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triboelectric_effect
http://www.siliconfareast.com/tribo_series.htm

The machine I built this weekend used two nylon rollers with one coated with teflon tape. If you look at the Tribo Series these are on opposite ends of the spectrum of taking or giving charge. At work we make sure we wear cotton only not only for fire/burn suppression, but also to keep ions from attaching to our clothing. Looking at the chart cotton is neutral. Very cool info.

2009 March 12
Demolishun permalink

DB_Skeptic,
Your response to Damien confuses me. How is “I personally cannot wear a watch, because they become out of sync immediately.” any different than “testing” with a testing device? As long as the experiment is repeatable then it IS “testing” to verify a result. Obviously there is no way to baseline other than placing the watch on someone else which would prove that yes the watch stays in sync as it was designed to do.

Further, if every watch Damien puts on goes out of sync I can suppose a few things: 1. Damien does not know how to use a watch, 2. Every watch he has ever put on has been defective, 3. There is something about Damien that keeps the watches he dons from working properly, or 4. Damien is on crack and everything he says or thinks is suspsect.

Now lest look at the likely hood of each:
1. Using a computer, sending email, or surfing the web are somewhat technical endeavors. Using a watch would more than likely be easier than those activities. However, he could be a Mac user… (That is intended as silly humor not be taken seriously by sensitive Mac users. :)
2. This is highly unlikely, however a baseline of a watch on a “non-force sensitive” would provide sufficient evidence to throw this out.
3. This would be the elusive mystical magical body chi energy or just freaky static build up to account for this.
4. While this is possible he is not talking about purple polka dotted elephants and does not claim ants are crawling all over his body. So I would have to throw that one out.

The confusion is that he provides some anecdotal evidence with a hint of experimental evidence when talking about the watch. With a little further experimentation by baselining that would be sufficient to qualify as “testing”.

2009 March 12
Matt permalink

Demolishun,

You’re ignoring the possibility that Damien is merely experiencing conformation bias. Damien hasn’t produced records, logs or detailed information on what happens to his watches, how long it takes or what is meant by “out of sync.” The human mind’s tendency to see patterns even where none exist leads people to ignore the data that contradicts their beleifs and embrace the data that supports it. This is a well known and well documented phenomena that has nothing to do with mental illness or mental defects.

For all we know Damien could be buying cheap watches, wearing them for a while and then attributing the natural drift of a cheap watch to some sort of mysterious, mystical electromagnetic effect. An actual experiment is needed to rule out flaws in observation and human bias. Your attempt to claim anecdotal evidence should be given the weight of a proper test is, to be blunt, naive and uninformed.

2009 March 12

Hi Demolishun,

As long as the experiment is repeatable then it IS “testing” to verify a result

Absolutely. But I’m not interested in verifying the results. We’re interested in causes. My comments are intended to spark an interest in the root cause of this issue.

If I have a flashlight that always burns out its batteries when I use it, your logic allows me to state, “I have a power that causes flashlights to die when I use them”, when it’s more likely that there may be something wrong with the batteries, the flashlight, or even the environment in which I use the flashlight.

To go back to your point: putting on a watch that soon goes out of sync does *not* mean your body affected the watch. It may have. It may not have – it may have been something else entirely. We just don’t have enough information to determine that. What I’m asking is that people research to find out.

With a little further experimentation by baselining that would be sufficient to qualify as “testing”.

I agree with this statement, but your four points above are not the only possibilities. What about faulty electronics in the house or the computer he uses (which comes in contact with the watch)? What if he keeps purchasing the same type of cheap, low-quality watches? What if his day job is physically stressful, and watches get knocked about a lot?

I’m not even saying my examples are the answer, but this is part of what I mean when I say “environment”. There are a lot of potential factors here besides a person’s body. It often seems that people would rather jump to a conclusion than to do the work and invalidate other possibilities.

Andy

2009 March 12

You beat me to it, Matt. I took too long to type. :)

2009 March 12
Demolishun permalink

I see what you are saying. I think having someone else use the same watches that he has trouble with would help shed some light. Without a way to isolate the environment there is no way to rule out everything. Yes, buying junky stuff did occur to me, but like you said we don’t have enough info.

It may be a little too much to ask the average net surfer to research this though. Most people don’t think in the scientific process at all. In addition many often rely on feelings when there is no known way to measure things that do not fit with established theory. This would include experiences (good and bad) that there is no way to determine where to start to figure them out. I have had experiences that I do not believe can be explained with experimentation and certainly are not repeatable in the scientific sense. These have been paranormal/spiritual in nature rather than body energy in nature. Of which I cannot rule out as I have observed manipulation of electronic devices by seemingly intelligent unseen forces. No, no mind altering substances were involved and multiple people witnessed the event.

It might help to suggest simple testing that can be done rather than just say “do testing”. This will not completely control the environmental problem, but it could get better data. It might even create some “eureka, that is what is causing that” events. Of course there are those who will cling to “this makes me special” no matter what.

Yes, I think suggesting a simple testing scheme per the individual for the un-science initiated could be very productive. However, suggesting buying a meter or scope would probably be overkill. People, just hire a research scientist and figure this out, okay! Haha! Hey, maybe somebody could create a body energy phenomenon group. It would be similar to the ghost research groups people are forming.

Anyway, I see your point in trying to better quantify what is happening and isolating the environment.

2009 March 21
Nadia Getet permalink

I always tell my teenage daughter that it is the plate in her head that causes the streetlights to go out when she goes by. I think she almost believes me. My son says (not to be outdone) that he has a reverse plate in his head–it causes lights to come on!

2009 April 2
Demolishun permalink

Matt,
I just realized you claimed something I didn’t say:
“Your attempt to claim anecdotal evidence should be given the weight of a proper test is, to be blunt, naive and uninformed.”

His evidence is not anecdotal:
“I personally cannot wear a watch, because they become out of sync immediately.”

Unless the word “immediately” can be imprecise. Perhaps that word needs to be refined. I would assume “out of sync” means, it doesn’t keep proper time and is unusable. If it drifted a few seconds in a day it would hardly be immediately or noticeable. Most cheap watches keep better time than that. Unless they are sun dials and when he walks around they become out of sync…

As to being “naive and uninformed” is to believe an untrained person would put forth the same rigor and thought into testing for a phenomenon as a trained scientist. Asking the question: “Can a person’s body generate static electricity?” of the internet masses knowing full well the majority of responses would be anecdotal in nature. Then telling them they are stupid because they aren’t scientists is either really “naive and uninformed” or designed to boost an overinflated ego.

Of course, it could just be a plate in someone’s head causing this. However, without further testing I cannot logically come to that conclusion. So, could everyone please put a magnet to their heads that responded to posts saying, “we need more testing”. This will only test for ferric based metals and won’t find stainless or plastic based plates… Ahhh, the madness never ends!

Smile, it is a day after April fools!
Cheers!

2009 April 4
Sharique Moin Rizvi permalink

hello, i sharique when i tuch any iron i feel spark and it has clearly seen. like any wire shot.even when i insert my key in my car at that time i feel and see spark.when i open look i feel same like this

2009 May 5
gomze permalink

I have lot of hair on my body. Could that be the possiblity of generating static charges of my body?

2009 May 5

Gomze,

No, I don’t think so. It seems like the static buildup is more often caused by inadequate grounding or low humidity.

Otherwise, most pets, sheep, Yeti and BigFoot would have major problems just walking around.

Andy

2009 May 10
Mayur permalink

I try to avoid ad hominems, but I’m afraid Kathleen seems to be about fifty-one cards short of a full deck. I’m Indian and I’ve never seen *any* evidence confirming the existence of mystical energies such as chi, kundalini, reiki etc. I’m more than a little surprised to see so many supposedly educated westerners fall for such rubbish.

2009 May 10

Mayur,

Even though I completely disagree with Kathleen, I’m going to defend her on this point. I don’t think her deck is missing any cards. However, I think her worldview and mine are too different. I’m not sure there’s a common ground here, so the conversation is more antagonistic than cooperating to understand each other. She wants us to research her claims so we can talk technical, but won’t talk technical when we have experts chime in. I want her to pin down exactly what technical aspects she’s bringing to the table, but she doesn’t want to elaborate, and insists we’re evading the issues. Frustrating on both sides. I like to think I get along with a lot of people, but it’s not true in this case.

I’m more than a little surprised to see so many supposedly educated westerners fall for such rubbish.

In your experience, is such belief really a Western-only thing? Or do “Eastern” people believe, but not to the extent of the Westerners?

Andy

2009 May 12
Electra permalink

I too have symptoms described above (streetlights, computers, cell, watches, etc.), so can be called a quack by scientists who can only explain in terms of my immediate environment. Have I tested to ensure it’s me and not the environment? I have changed diet, clothing, flooring, housing, yet it exists in my environment and outside of my environment. I began having seizures as an adult, which seem to be triggered by EMF. Here’s a synergistic hypothesis for careful consideration and possible ridicule (ok my name’s not Electra):

The metal in my mouth builds static in my body. The elevated metal in my body (confirmed by unprovoked 24 hr. urinalysis) sticks to organs/tissue when I’m charged. Pulsed EMF field causes spark (like tinfoil in microwave) and I seize.
Low constant EMF field mobilizes metal, which can change (alleviate or worsen- musical chairs) symptoms.

Metals in the body exist in trace amounts via diet and higher amounts via dental devices or surgical implants. We used to see houses with many tv antennaes to get more channels. With the increase in EMF’s in the environment, antennaes on the body may represent new harm… even seemingly harmless items such as jewelry, belt buckles and bra underwire. If you swallow a penny and swallow a nickel, does that make you a battery?

2009 June 17
Vee permalink

I am actually doing research to understand why i break so many electrical appliances. It is getting expensive! Does anyone knows more about why certain people cause electrical devices to break and computerized machinery to break down? I am getting worried about myself.

2009 June 17

Vee, read the above comments to find the answer to your question. It’s been covered many times.

If you’re honestly doing research (and I assume testing) on this, I’d be very interested to hear the results. Please post them here, or contact me using the “Contact” link at the very top of this page.

Andy

2009 June 17
Robert permalink

Taking a vacuum cleaner out of service? My vacuum cleaner runs on twelve (12) amperes; it takes about one tenth of an ampere to stop a beating heart!

Magnets, as well as static electricity, can cause problems with un-protected monitors and cause RAM issues.

Walking over a carpet can generate around thirty five thousand (35,000 ß not a typo) volts.

Most psychologists are not electrical engineers; reminds me of a scene in “Lovesick,” when Dudley Moore made a special foil cap to protect a patients brains from the space aliens…or was that the government?

Electric eels can produce up to 600 volts, but the amount of amperes are only enough to stun, maybe kill if the person has heart problems: a pacer, etc..

The release of static electricity is not felt until around two thousand to three thousand volts; less than one hundred volts can damage unprotected integrated circuits.

Voltage is the measure of potential difference, or pressure, like the pressure in a garden hose; current is the actual item causing the pressure, like the water in a garden hose.

2009 June 28
Robert permalink

Why did this conversation go silent?

2009 June 28

Robert, I’m guessing people are done talking because:

1) The skeptics have stated their requirements of proof, and their offers to help test.

2) The believers have stated their beliefs, but are not willing or able to perform a proper test to verify their beliefs.

I suppose we can get more personal anecdotes and claims and theories, but until someone tests their electric zapping ability, is there anything more to say?

Andy

2009 June 28
Robert permalink

I guess not, although I was waiting for someone to ask about my first statement; I do not need to tell you, because I believe you know where I was going.

2009 July 1
Electra permalink

It went silent, because experts cannot disprove the hypothesis and/or do not feel qualified to comment on and/or explore electromagnetics, metallurgy or the synergistic effects of static electricity with the same.

Robert: are you saying I would have a heart attack before I could fry my computer with static electricity?

2009 July 1

Electra, you fail to understand how science works.

In the real world, where real scientists who actually accomplish things work, a hypothesis has to be tested and proven. The people who propose a hypothesis have to provide test cases to evaluate the hypothesis. You are the one making extraordinary claims. Like it or not, it’s up to you to prove it. You have failed to provide any proof or even a scenario for a reliable test case to evaluate the claims. Anecdotes are not data, in part because they do not account for all the other possible explanations for the claimed phenomena, are not blinded or double blind and are not objective.

What’s more, you’re asking science to prove a negative. I could claim that I can float 4 feet above the ground and shoot lasers out of my eyes, and then ridicule YOU for failing to disprove me. An actual scientist will simply tell me that, in the absence of proof of my claims of levitation and ocular weaponry, they must accept what’s known as the “null hypothesis” that I do NOT posses the absurd powers I claim.

In short Electra, I am forced to consider you a closed minded skeptic who is afraid to face reality and consider science that’s outside the box because you refuse to accept that I can levitate 4 feet above the ground and shoot lasers out of my eyes.

You cannot disprove the hypothesis and/or do not feel qualified to comment on and/or explore electromagnetics, metallurgy or the synergistic effects of anti gravity and biological laser generation with the same.

2009 July 1
Electra permalink

So what you’re saying is a real scientist cannot comment on the scientific basis of a hypothesis until someone else tests it?

2009 July 1

“So what you’re saying is a real scientist cannot comment on the scientific basis of a hypothesis until someone else tests it?”

That was a cute attempt at twisting my words. I was talking about what’s needed for a theory to be accepted as plausible, not what’s needed for people to discuss it. Discussion is needed to construct a theory and to test that theory. It’s a precursor.

You’ve made extraordinary claims about the human body and magnetism. The default position, the null hypothesis, is that your claims are either untrue or your interpretation of them is flawed. There have been a number of discussions here about similar claims and as of yet, no one has proposed anything that does not have a conventional explanation.

You seem to think scientists should expend considerable energy testing every crackpot theory some nutjob cooks up. There just isn’t enough money or scientists to do that kind of exhaustive and futile research. Scientists LOVE a challenge and every scientists would LOVE to see their name connected to a new discovery. The problem for this discussion is that this field is full of people making wild claims, but unable to provide any evidence. The rants and claims of the marginally sane are not of much interest to physicists. They’re the realm of psychiatric medicine and psychology.

2009 July 1
Electra permalink

The thinly-veiled insults have not detracted from your failure to discuss or question technical aspects of the hypothesis. Re: insults- no worries… none taken :)

I understand that proof positive involves scientific protocol; however, this is a discussion board and as you say, “Discussion is needed to construct a theory and to test that theory. ”

According to the U.S. Dept. of Energy, the most serious hazard posed by metal whiskers is a metal vapor arc, in which the whisker vaporizes into a cluster of extremely conductive metal ions capable of carrying hundreds of amperes of current and can also cause voltage to jump across electrical circuitry and cause short circuits.

This study shows that body metal, such as dental amalgam does whisker (T. BONSTEIN1, L.M. MIKULSKI2, M. BUSH3, and P.J. BUSH3, 1University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 2University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 3State University of New York – Buffalo, Buffalo, NY) “Growth of Mercury/Silver Intermetallic Whiskers on Amalgam”.

“Magnetic fields can penetrate the human body and can
generate currents that might interact with the electrical functions
of the brain.”
Gerald Cooray1 and Vernon Cooray*,2
1Department of Neurophysiology, Karolinska Institute, Sweden
2Division for electricity, Department of Engineering Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden
The Open Atmospheric Science Journal, 2008, 2, 102-105

Barry Trower’s “Tetra” report provides a good overview of EMF, as well as identifies potential synergistic effects of body metal. “Warnings are also given to persons with metal implants in their bodies. These implants can a) warm up; and b) absorb the microwave radiation and re-emit it at a different wavelength.”
http://www.tetrawatch.net/papers/trower_report.pdf

2009 July 1
Anti-Electra permalink

1. What claims are you actually making? What are YOU claiming, so we can separate you from the other folks in this thread? You made some vague references to having an effect on streetlights. What exactly have you experienced?

2. Are your claims extraordinary in any way? That is, are you claiming anything that’s outside the realm of conventional science or that requires an exotic theory of biology? Are there conventional explanations for your claims? Most of the folks posting here have claims that amount to little more than mundane static shock. You’ve been too vague with your actual claims to make any judgments.

3. What tests can be constructed to evaluate your claims?

On a side note, I recommend taking anything on tetrawatch.net with the proverbial grain of salt. I recommend checking out Skeptoid episode #72 “Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Real or Imagined?”
http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4072#

Skeptoid also has episodes dealing with some of the other EM Radiation fears, and does a nice job of highlighting the difference between some of the crackpoots spouting pseudo-scientific nonsense and the real science.

2009 July 2
Electra permalink

1. The hypothesis is that there may be a synergistic relationship between static electricity, body metal and EMF, which causes a greater electrophysiological reaction than the that of the isolated elements.

My personal experiences are outlined in my initial post, but are irrelevant to experts chiming in on the technical aspects of the hypothesis.

2. Extraordinary, exotic… hardly :)

Mainstream science accepts that:
-a body can be statically charged as demonstrated by touching a Van De Graaff electrostatic generator
-body metal such as amalgam can whisker
-metal whiskering can carry hundreds of amperes of current
-magnetic fields can penetrate the human body and can generate currents

3. Monitoring by EEG and ECG any electrophysiological changes which occur after statically-charged subjects with body metal are exposed to varied EMF levels and types. Control subjects: 1) no body metal 2)not statically-charged

Re: sidenote- My post did not mention hypersensitivity.

A technical discussion re: the synergism of static electricity that could explain “electric symptoms” seems more worthwhile than calling your posters crackpots and more in keeping with scientists who love challenges.

If the hypothesis has no scientific merit in your view, please explain your views in technical terms. If the means to test this hypothesis were provided, what would you expect to find in terms of scientific probability?

2009 July 2

The way I read your post, all you’re really claiming is that electricity and magnetic fields can impact the human body and that excess metallic content in the body can influence the degree and scope of that impact. If this really is the extent of your claims than I appear to have very unfairly lumped you in with some of the more, shall we say, entertaining claims made in this thread.

Is that an accurate summary, or am I missing something?

The term “electric symptoms” also covers a wide range of topics, from well documented and tested phenomena such as electric shock at one extreme to the modern day equivalent of “hysterical fits” known as “Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity” at the other.

It sounds like it would be worthwhile to discuss the specific electric symptoms you have in mind.

2009 July 2
Electra permalink

I’d like to discuss the probability of static electricity + body metal + EMF causing neurotransmitters to misfire in the brain and produce a variety of symptoms (depending on site of misfiring), as well as testing methods of the same.

One symptom of neurotransmitter misfiring is a seizure. I appreciate that Physicists are not Epileptologists or Metallurgists (and vice versa). Synergistic relationships seem problematic if several fields of expertise are involved and rightly so. In this case (and likely others), Physicists may be most able to bridge the gap if such a gap exists. Are they willing? I do believe they “love a challenge,” and I commend your willingness to discuss a synergistic hypothesis.

A recent article may be useful and/or of interest, which states that “epilepsy is a disorder in which the brain produces sudden bursts of electrical energy” and describes seizures as “cataclysmic electrical storms.”
( http://www.newsweek.com/id/193586 )

Fig. (3) on Page 2 of “IS THERE A CONNECTION BETWEEN THUNDERSTORMS AND EPILEPTIC SEIZURES?” ( http://www.el.angstrom.uu.se/meny/artiklar/ball%20lightning.pdf )
graphs the correlation between the daily rate of atmospherics and the daily frequency of epileptic seizures, which is explained as “atmospherics with large amplitudes are generated frequently during thunderstorms, this observation indicates some connection between thunderstorms and epileptic seizures. Even though the exact mechanism of how atmospherics can trigger epileptic seizures is unknown, one may suspect that the magnetic field associated with the atmospheric is the culprit. This is because magnetic fields can penetrate the human body and can generate currents that might interact with the electrical functions of the brain.”

The same article states that “it has been reported in the scientific literature that there is an increase in the frequency of epileptic seizures during geomagnetic disturbances,suggesting that exposure to changing magnetic fields could trigger epileptic seizures.”

All of my seizures seem to be triggered upon entering high EMF areas, yet at other times I have entered those areas and haven’t seized. The difference seems to be static electricity and is therefore included in the synergistic hypothesis. I regularly walk long distances in running shoes. When the tonic-clonic (grand mal) seizures occurred, I had walked to the locations immediately prior to entering the high EMF area. The times without tonic-clonic seizures, I hadn’t. I recognize that this may or may not be related, but to date seems to be a common denominator.

Mainstream science has thus far offered no explanation or solution. It has been suggested that perhaps I was dehydrated, although on other days with the same regimen I wasn’t. One M.D. said that “maybe it was the potato salad or the combination of the potato salad and not getting enough sleep… we don’t know.” There are countless possibilities, but I would like to discuss the scientific probability of the proposed hypothesis, rather than the merits (or lack thereof) of how it was formed. Personal details are included only to provide insight as to the inclusion of static electricity in the hypothesis and to discuss testing of the same. I understand that any isolated personal experiment does not constitute scientific evidence.

I am scheduled for a 48-hr ambulatory EEG this month in which the Neurologist would like me to trigger a seizure for recording.

1. In the event that it is humid/raining on the test dates, could you suggest how I could recreate the statically-charged state that may have existed when entering high EMF areas during previous seizures (e.g. walking 6 km in running shoes in dry conditions) and how to verify/quantify the same? A gaussmeter could verify/quantify “high EMF.”

2. If the means to test this hypothesis were provided to you, what would you expect to find in terms of scientific possibility?

3. If the means to test this hypothesis were provided to you, what would you expect to find in terms of scientific probability?

2009 July 3
Robert/snoglydox permalink

If a person could create enough static electricity on their body, to produce the current needed to take out a standard vacuum cleaner, that person would most likely kill the person (and most likely himself/herself) he/she came in contact with, if discharged at the same rate; I mentioned nothing of computers in that statement. Static electricity has been known to cause running (on, not off) equipment to go awry, by effecting the memory ICs (changing the data,) and in computers, this situation may force a person to have to reboot that computer. In one instance at a manufacturing plant, I recall the problem was solved when the employees were required to start practicing safe ESD practices.

In the above I say running, because damaged to components usually comes about when current, above the reverse handling current of the active (transistors, diodes, etc.) components, avalanches the active components inside/on the chip; this is less likely when there is bias to the active components on the IC, and bias will usually be there when the equipment is running. CMOS technology is a good example, and power must always be applied to ICs using this technology before applying input data; I have done this more than once while testing, and ended up rebuilding the darn thing (high voltage equipment are real fun, because things explode and parts fly out.)

2009 July 3
Robert/snoglydox permalink

“ocular weaponry”

I laughed at that.

2009 July 3
Electra permalink

Robert, I mentioned computers rather than vacuums only because mainstream science accepts that they can be “taken out” by static electricity. As I understand it, my quadcore will take 6-10A and each video card will take approx. 12A. While a single processor/video card system would take less, it would still exceed the .5A quoted to “take out” a heart?

P.S. Agreed… the “ocular weaponry” comment was good!

2009 July 3
Robert/snoglydox permalink

Processors now a day run at about three(3) volts direct current or less (smaller voltages decrease rise and fall times…increasing frequency;) three (3) volts is not enough potential to create the 0.1 amperes of current to stop a human heart.

Because many people do not understand the concept of voltage and current, I made a simple attempt to explain in a later statement in my first post; I have an automobile battery charger that can push over fifty amperes of current (starting position,) but because it only has about a fourteen voltage potential, I will not get shocked touching both clamps (if I were to touch both to my tongue, I would literally cook my tongue in seconds.)

Current in electronics is the measure of the flow of electrons, and the equations are exactly the same when referring to water flow, for the exception of the different terminology. If you had a water hose (without the nozzle for this example) and intended to get a friend wet ten feet away, although there would be a great amount of water flow coming out of the hose, you would not reach the friend because the pressure is not enough (assuming you have normal residential water access;) on the other hand, if you put your thumb over the end, you would decrease the water flow, but increase the pressure enough to get your friend wet, but not as wet if you took the hose to him/her, and put it above his/her head (without the thumb assistance.) My vacuum cleaner uses twelve amperes at a one hundred twenty voltage potential; although I could create a charge on my body with a potential to the tens of thousands of volts, the release would not be enough to create the current required for my heart to feel it, and therefore, not nearly enough to effect a vacuum cleaner, or other running major appliance for that matter, like the person in the article, and some people posting, are claiming.

2009 July 4
Electra permalink

Why is the vacuum analogy assuming the current will travel through the heart? Although 100mA is sufficient to stop the heart, there are many survivors of higher currents (electric shock, lightning strike, etc.).

Mainstream science seems to agree that current doesn’t always travel through the heart, as it is not usually in the path of least resistance. According to the National Weather Service, “Only about 10% of people who are struck by lightning are killed, leaving 90% with various degrees of disability.” Does this not suggest that the body can conduct very high levels of electricity without “taking out” the heart in some cases? Don’t the survivors with various degrees of disability suggest the current can affect bodily systems (e.g. neurological) without “taking out” the heart in some cases?

In the case of lightning, it “is often conducted over the skin and does not enter the body. This phenomenon, called “flashover” is responsible for the relatively low mortality of lightning injuries.”
Andrew D. Mason, MD; R. Kemp Crockett, MD- “When Lighting Strikes . . .A Case Report and Review of the Literature”

Sidenote: The same source indicates a possible synergistic effect of external “body metal”:
“Objects on the skin surface such as sweat or jewelry may disrupt the flashover and cause an internal flow, producing greater injury. When flashover occurs the victim is subjected to a large electromagnetic field, which can disrupt neurosynaptic transmission”

2009 July 5
Robert/snoglydox permalink

The topic here is about people claiming to produce enough charge in their bodies to cause damage to major appliances like vacuum cleaners or kettles or street lights (with no semi-conductor makeup), that can handle exponential current compared to the human body; on the other hand, the human body cannot reach the charge of mother nature, except in comic books.

The human body is a complex “resistor/capacitor,” and there are many factures involved: is the person wet/dry, is the person robust/feeble, is the person over/under weight, what is the person’s regular diet, when was the last time he/she ate, and what, where was he/she standing, was he/she touching something, and was it grounded…clothing, jewelry, etc. Skin usually has the highest resistance (~1,000 to ~100,000 ohms,) where nerves and muscle (example –> heart… note also, the article you mentioned has an error — the chart is correct, but the statement before is incorrect or misleading) have the least resistance (~100 to ~1,000 ohms;) skin can also produce a capacitance effect that increases resistance in direct current (may be part of the reason for the flash effect you mention, where it appears the skin performs like a faraday cage, to the more conductive and sensitive internal makeup of the body.)

I would also like to mention, when lightening “strikes” a person, it is not just striking that person; the person become part of a much bigger circuit (google electrical resistance;) on the other hand, the article you mention reads “The more common mechanism is the ‘splash’ or ‘side flash‘…” Either way, one claim of the person in the article declares when she “plugged in a television set and ended up blowing up the television and flying across the room,” sounds more like a lightning strike.

2009 July 7
Electra permalink

Although body metal and EMF may not be proven to be related to the static electricity potential of humans and/or its “symptoms,” the potential synergistic relationship seems more probable based on principles of mainstream science than
“occular weaponry” (recognizing that neither hypothesis is proven).

Unless I’m missing something, this discussion is about the symptoms of excessive static electricity in the body, whether they exist, and if they do, “prove it” -or how could they be explained in mainstream science? A hypothesis in this regard, synergistic or otherwise, seems relevant to the topic.

Survivors of high voltage shock and/or lightning seem to be living examples of high voltage conductors. Do the survivors in these cases suggest that a human may be able to conduct rather than generate high charge in their bodies without “taking out” the heart? Among all the variables of high voltage shock lethality (including resistance), current pathway seems to be a vital factor in survival.

If the current pathway in these cases were to always go through the heart, survivors would likely only be cartoon characters. Mainstream science seems to agree that if the current passes through the chest or head there is an increased chance of death, but this is not always the case.

Many of the symptoms in this discussion have not been proven to exist; however, “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence” (Carl Sagon). While it’s possible that reported symptoms outside of mainstream science, such as many in this discussion, may actually be psychiatric symptoms, it’s also possible an explanation exists within the realm of mainstream science, which has yet to be identified. Psychiatry itself seems to base many conclusions solely on symptom reports and
hypotheses in the absence of scientific proof.

With regard to SLI (street light interference), I agree that it could be faulty equipment coupled with an observant human, but could it be a “Relativistic Doppler effect” within the realm of Quantum Field Theory? (causing a hps street to increase/decrease current and temporarily extinguish?). If not, please explain.

While I agree that it does not seem probable that humans themselves can generate the current required to disable major appliances, it does seem possible that as electrical conductors with a static charge that they may influence/be influenced by a magnetic field via induction and more so with antennas (body metal) in or on their bodies.?

Body metal can whisker and whiskers can carry high current (sources in previous post) and therefore are potential antennas in the synergistic hypothesis. “Even detached whiskers can drift (or be propelled by air handling systems) into connected areas and affect circuitry in a different physical location” (Stephanie Barr, “MITIGATING AND PREVENTING THE GROWTH OF TIN AND OTHER METAL WHISKERS ON CRITICAL HARDWARE”).

“Tin whiskers can be prevented by including >3% lead to the tin alloy. Metal whiskers are not a new phenomena, but new restrictions precluding the use of lead for electronics have made pure tin plating more prevalent.” (http://nepp.nasa.gov/WHISKER/reference/tech_papers/2007-barr-presentation-mitigating-whiskers.pdf)

Technology based on “whiskering” has been developed that converts the kinetic energy of walking into electrical energy. “Their results confirm a theory: zinc oxide nanowires will show a powerful piezoelectric effect, which is the production of electricity in response to mechanical pressure.” “Our goal is to one day put these into people’s shoes so you can generate electricity when you’re walking.” (published in the journal Science by Zhong Lin Wang).

“The growth mechanism of ZnO nanowires may be attributed to a vapor–solid (VS) whisker growth mechanism based on Sears’ law.” (Cai-Ling Xua, Dong-Huan Qina, Hua Lia, Yun Guoa, Tao Xub and Hu-Lin Li-”Low-temperature growth and optical properties of radial ZnO nanowires”).

The level of anions and cations in whiskering components was 2.3x higher than for good components which did not whisker after assembly. The main contaminants were chloride, fluoride, sodium and calcium. (Polina Snugovsky, Zohreh Bagheri, Marianne Romansky- “WHISKER GROWTH ON SAC SOLDER JOINTS: MICROSTRUCTURE ANALYSIS”)

“Wet bone [also] behaves as a piezoelectric material.”Fukada, E., and Yasuda, I., J. phys. Soc. Japan, 12, 1158–1162 (1957) “Because bone is piezoelectric and electrokinetic, it generates an electrical signal in response to the applied force. That electrical signal then effects bone formation.” (Bassett, “Effect of Force on Skeletal Tissues,” Physiological Basis of Rehabilitation Medicine, Downey and Darling eds., 1st ed., W. B. Saunders Co.)

Would you expect the level of static electricity in a human with body metal tested in isolation may differ from the same human walking in an electromagnetic field (recognizing other variables such as humidity, footwear, clothing, etc.)?

2009 July 7
Robert/snoglydox permalink

First, let me brief you about the three variables in electronics/electricity; a light bulb should shine above an intelligent person as yourself, and you should dismay lightening. Assuming you have googled resistance, I shall now ask you to google voltage divider; I will use your lightening scenario to help explain voltage potential, current, and resistance (ohms law.) Lightening hitting a person on the way to it’s final destination, simplified, is a voltage divider, and the majority of the voltage potential is across the air; to overcome one centimeter of air, a voltage potential of about 30,000 volts is needed, so this means two centimeters needs 60,000 volts, three centimeters need 90,000 volts, and so on, so although lightening can be in the millions of volts, and has been recorded up to 100,000 amperes, the voltage across the person hit is a fraction of the total voltage, and in some scenarios, is not enough to overcome the skin (very roughly fifty volts, at the low end.) On the other hand, once the current does overcome the skin, the human body becomes part of another voltage divider (simplified,) and if the voltage potential that overcame the skin is much larger…well …want to cook a hotdog faster than a microwave; plug the ends of a cut cord at each end of the hotdog and plug it in (please do not actually do this: there are cookers out there that use this same principal, and are much safer.) What I am trying to say here, is in some cases, a person would be better off getting hit by the million volts from lightening, than grabbing hold of your standard household one hundred twenty volts.

A magnetic field will induce a current in conductor if it cuts the magnetic lines of flux.

“SLI?” LOL. That is probably in the same readings as “ocular weaponry.” “Relativistic Doppler effect?” The answer is no. You need to reevaluate your understanding: look it up.

Whiskers follow the same laws as all conductors; they can handle only the current determined by material, length, cross-sectional area, and temperature…and perhaps, lack of oxygen (tungsten in standard incandescent light bulb,) no more!

“SLI” LOL…that’s funny…

2009 July 8
Electra permalink

With respect to street light interference, how many people have reported such symptoms? At what level are reports counted instead of discounted? (it’s a serious question- I really don’t know). It would seem that ridiculing reported symptoms would offend the reporter, deter exploration and/or further reports, but no worries… again, none taken. :)

If I understand you correctly, you are saying that a human can not be a conductor of a high current and survive? How do you explain electrical workers who have received high voltage shocks and survived? Were those shocks really not high voltage as well? I appreciate the provided lightning information; however, there are still many unanswered questions in this regard, some of which are within previous posts.

If “the Doppler shift, as it is also known, applies to electromagnetic waves in all portions of the spectrum,” (Eleni Adrian, NCSA- The National Center for Supercomputing Applications) why would it not apply in this case?

Do the streetlight and the moving object emit electromagnetic radiation and together form an electromagnetic field? As the moving object approaches the streetlight wouldn’t the waves compress and the intervals between the waves diminish, which would translate into an increase in frequency? As the moving object recedes, wouldn’t the electromagnetic waves stretch?

Studies indicate that “when specific molecules were placed anywhere in the close vicinity of the path of a light beam (laser), their molecular information, as well as information on electrical & magnetic fields, is transmitted bi-directionally along the path of this light beam” (Omura Y, Losco M, Omura AK, Takeshige C, Hisamitsu T, Nakajima H, Soejima K, Yamamoto S, Ishikawa H, Kagoshima T, et al, “Bi-directional transmission of molecular information by photon or electron beams passing in the close vicinity of specific molecules, and its clinical and basic research applications”)

“Current evolution of wireless personal communications has necessitated a comprehensive understanding of electromagnetic (EM) interactions between handset antennas and the nearby human body. These human-antenna interactions influence the electromagnetic performance of the antenna by altering antenna input impedence, modifying the antenna radiation patterns and polarization state, absorbing antenna-delivered power and so on.” “An important factor in determining power absorption is the proximity of the “hot” current spots near the head and hand” (Kyōhei Fujimoto, James R. James, “Mobile antenna systems handbook”)

“In some case, poorly designed audio equipment, decaying dental amalgams, or copper plumbing with deteriorated joints has effectively demodulated high-power shortwave transmissions” (Leo Finkelstein, “Pocket Book of Technical Writing for Engineers and Scientists”)

2009 July 8
Electra permalink

Note: “Were those shocks really not high voltage as well?”should read: Did those shocks really not have a high current as well?

2009 July 8
Robert/snoglydox permalink

Those who make those comments do not have the many degrees in electrical/electronic theory, such as myself, so it appears they try to glue together pieces of real science, with what they are eager to believe, when they do not even have the foundation to understand (it is like a student asking questions on how to multiply, when that student has not learned to add;) these fabrications becomes humorous to people, such as myself, who understand, and make their living in these sciences. You are the one asking the questions…not me.

2009 July 8
Electra permalink

Perhaps scientists who specialize in non-living matter ask less questions as the subject of study is a man-made object, but I would think the nature of bioscience is to question since many remain unanswered.

I am as eager to disbelieve as I am to believe and would appreciate even short scientific answers to my questions so I can “look it up.”

2009 July 14
Cheryl permalink

I too suffer from this problem(?) That is how I came to this page. I turn off/reset electrical appliances. Recently I had a curling iron explode on me. My brain races out of control when an electrical storm is approaching. I have also had the street lights go out on me. Once I was knocked to the ground simply changing a light bulb. I now change light bulbs with rubber gloves on. This has happened everywhere I’ve lived/worked. In the incident of the light bulb I had the electrical wiring checked. It is a very scary and painful thing to live with. But at the same time pretty darn cool. My theory is that people (like myself) who think more and faster then the average person experience this due to them generating a stronger EMP then the average human brain. I don’t have the resources to test this but it does give me some comfort.

2009 August 3
Jim Phillips permalink

I am amazed at the problems Static Electricity appears to cause people. My experience, apart from my computer shutting down occasionally, is very positive
The human body is made up of millions of cells made active by a form of energy…possibly static as we term it, I believe excesses of this can be of benefit to healing. That this can be generated to excess by thought or artificial means. It is not just Reiki, but hand healing is recorded thoughout history and the New Testament in particular.
A form of static electrictity emanates from our finger tips and I have been exploiting this for some 20 years. I stir all liquids whether cold or hot, including water. The pupose being to ingest liquid charged with static energy.
My health is astonishing. I am 87 and actively doing gardening and woodwork along with my efforts to spread the idea of Caring Global Ethics. (global-caring-ethics.com). I was termed as a delicate child at school and could not perform stressful sports
Sceptics will say my positive health is not relative to this “recharging ” myself with this body energy. Comments welcome!

2009 August 5

Jim,

What testing have you performed to verify your body is generating this static electricity, and your environment is not?

Andy

2009 August 13
Demolishun permalink

First, a degree means you are an expert in an EXISTING field. So, for emerging fields that may or may not deal with things an expert may have experienced it is better to assume you know nothing about that field. For instance, what makes anyone on this thread so certain we are not dealing with something like spintronics? So far I have heard only standard electrical theory. I have not heard anything about quantum physics either. What makes anyone so certain that enough quanta effects can not add up to a macro effect? The body does contains billions of cells does it not? Especially considering that Schrodinger discovered that experimental results are affected by the expectations of the outcome for quantum manipulations.

What testing have you science experts done to rule out spintronics, quantum, or God forbid, something as of yet identified by modern physics?

2009 August 13

>For instance, what makes anyone on this thread
>so certain we are not dealing with something like spintronics?

Because we’re dealing with organic matter for the supposed generation of current (a person’s body). My understanding is that this is outside of the application of spintronics.

>So far I have heard only standard electrical theory.

The claimants seem to all state that standard electrical theory applies! That is, all their symptoms are testable, physical symptoms. We therefore respond with answers dealing with standard electrical theory.

> Especially considering that Schrodinger discovered that experimental
> results are affected by the expectations of the outcome for quantum manipulations.

I don’t think Schrodinger discovered this. Or rather, I don’t know if he did or not, but would like to know. Can you give a reference?

Regardless of that above answer, though, it doesn’t apply to this conversation, because of the next point:

>What testing have you science experts done to rule out spintronics, quantum,
>or God forbid, something as of yet identified by modern physics

I believe you’re misunderstanding how the scientific method works, and you’re also performing inefficient analysis.

For the first point, it’s not up to the science experts to rule out anything – It’s up to the claimants to show that their theory holds water.

Second, why look at extreme answers before ruling out “normal” ones?

Andy

2009 August 13
Robert/snoglydox permalink

Spintronics is fascinating; I personally look forward in purchasing a quantum computer involving the three-state logic, if I am still around. Organic electronics is also exciting, as well as chaos theory computers. On that note, a theory could be created that extraterrestrial beings are creating the events, but that, and other theories are irrelevant here, because there are real and proven theories, and psychology, that explain the events.

2009 August 13
Demolishun permalink

Because we’re dealing with organic matter for the supposed generation of current (a person’s body). My understanding is that this is outside of the application of spintronics.
Spintronics deals with materials that display very different properties.  This is NOT limited to ferromagnetic materials commonly used in with regular magnetism.  Spintronics is something that exist in nature is various forms and we barely just discovered it and in less than 10 years will be using it for more advanced computers.  It is already used in hard drives.  To say that it is not applicable to the human body is like saying gravity is not applicable.  It is a physical phenomenon that cannot be ruled out.
I don’t think Schrodinger discovered this. Or rather, I don’t know if he did or not, but would like to know. Can you give a reference?
Maybe you should do your homework before rendering an opinion.  If you want to know about Schoedinger and quantum mechanics then search the internet or read a book.
you’re also performing inefficient analysis.

For what?  Rendering ideas of other possible explanations.  You are the one assuming it can ONLY be explained by electromagnetic theory as it exists, but you claim anyone who experiences fantastic things is a crackpot.  How did you get to be so obtuse?
Second, why look at extreme answers before ruling out “normal” ones?
It is obvious that other explanations are needed since nobody has been able to find a working theory that might reach a concensus of understanding for all participants.
 
Explain this event with any scientific theory:
I have on two separate occasions felt the Holy Spirit enter my body and give me a sense of peace and love by a blessing from a holy man.  It did not feel like electricity as I know what that feels like.  There is no explanable source of power by physical means.  In addition this same experience has been felt by thousands of participants at every event this holy man holds.
You will have to accept at some point in your life that some things cannot be explained based upon the existing knowledge we now have.  Especially when it comes to things that border supernatural.  It is no accident that I am now having this conversation with you now.
Ask yourself these questions:
Do you have trouble accepting any form of authority?
Did you rebel against your parents?
Are you suffering from a deep pain in your past either self inflicted or externally inflicted?
If you are honest with yourself and if you answer yes to those questions you are in need to examine what you believe because it isn’t working.  I invite you to really search your soul and see why you attack everyone who holds a different opinion from you.

2009 August 13

Hi Demolishun,

>Maybe you should do your homework before rendering an opinion.

Yikes! I was just asking for information you clearly have but I do not. No need to insult me (and then still refuse to help). Again, just my searching for efficiency: if you had the information at your fingertips, you’ll save me (and everyone else reading this article) time.

>You are the one assuming it can ONLY be explained by electromagnetic theory as it exists, but you claim anyone who experiences fantastic things is a crackpot.

Where did I say either one of these things? Please point that out, and I’ll apologize here, because that was not my intent. My point was that it’s not sensible to assume supernatural when the physical hasn’t been ruled out. Now, if you and I have different threshholds of proof, that’s one thing. But I don’t think that’s what you’re talking about here.

> Explain this event with any scientific theory:

I’d like to take the effort, but first see below, and let me know where this conversation stands.

>How did you get to be so obtuse?

I never heard this word used as an insult before until “The Shawshank Redemption” broke into pop culture. Then everyone started using it. I assume you’re using it as such an insult here. If you honestly believe I’m deliberately covering my eyes (as opposed to trying to learn your opinion while pitching the value of critical thought), then yes, I’m being obtuse. If you want to discuss, I’m willing. But be respectful to everyone else on this site, regardless of their or your opinions. If you’re just going to insult me, we’re done here. This is your only warning.

Andy

2009 August 14
Demolishun permalink

If you’re just going to insult me, we’re done here. This is your only warning.
I apologize as I see all sorts of demeaning comments on this thread to those who do not have the background to defend themselves.  That may have colored my response and I unfairly singled you out. 

The word obtuse is a way to describe someone who does not allow additional information to enter their thinking or is one sided.  It is another word for ignorant to new ideas.  It could be an insult or it could be a signal that we need to broaden our horizons.  I will freely admit that there are many areas of my life that I am obtuse about.  I am fairly certain that you can easily see some of those areas based upon our conversation.  Basically we are flawed and sometimes we need someone to gently point it out where we can grow.
Back to subject: until we can absolutely rule out other physical phenomena out we have to consider it could be a previously unidentified effect or a combination of effects.  At this point I cannot completely explain machine disruptions with standard electrical theory.  There is no physical contact other than sharing a common ground plane.  The magnetism needed to cause the problems would be very high and stuff would be sticking to the person.  So I have to consider something that is at the outset is just “spooky” though in 20 years could be completely explained.  However, several observers saw the exact same thing and could not reproduce it using their own body.  Same environment, same conditions, etc.
So, go look up the other topics and lets see where it takes us.

2009 August 14
Robert/snoglydox permalink

Earth is a giant capacitor, capable of absorbing a tremendous amount of joules; this is why we ram a rod into the ground for grounding at our homes, and why lightening strikes earth. A voltage potential of about 30,000 volts is needed to overcome one centimeter of air, so it takes a large potential to jump, but no physical contact is needed (Walking over a carpet can generate around thirty five thousand volts.)

2009 August 18
Andy Kaiser permalink

Demolishun,

until we can absolutely rule out other physical phenomena out we have to consider it could be a previously unidentified effect or a combination of effects

If the effects you mention are physical (non-supernatural), I agree.

At this point I cannot completely explain machine disruptions with standard electrical theory.

Neither can I, in all cases. However, I’d argue it’s because we don’t have enough evidence. We simply need more information before we can come to a decision one way or another. My problem is that people are saying “we don’t know, therefore it must be supernatural”. I’m not ruling out the supernatural, but I think that moving to that conclusion, when so few facts are known, and so little testing has been done, is jumping the gun.

Back to your earlier questions:

Explain this event with any scientific theory:
I have on two separate occasions felt the Holy Spirit enter my body and give me a sense of peace and love by a blessing from a holy man.  It did not feel like electricity as I know what that feels like.  There is no explanable source of power by physical means.  In addition this same experience has been felt by thousands of participants at every event this holy man holds.

First, you can’t equate electricity to human emotion. They’re not the same thing. Second, the description you give can be described by emotional manipulation of a subject. And I don’t mean that in a bad way, either: I’ve felt similar emotions, though I don’t ascribe it to something outside of my own brain. When I get the right triggers, I behave a certain way. I love my daughter, and when I look at her sleeping – all cute and clearly NOT up to mischief :) – I get a wave of parental love. It’s peaceful, loving, and has also been felt by countless other parents. That’s close to your description above about the Holy Spirit. I felt that way because I love my daughter. I don’t have someone else telling me to love her, telling me I should feel a certain way. No one’s coming up to me and injecting “spiritual electricity” into my head. I love her because of our emotional connection, because I’m her father, because I’ve invested so much effort into her, and am thrilled to see her grow into a beautiful, intelligent person. This is special to me, of course, but these feelings floating in my brain aren’t unique. And they’re powerful. This is what drives the human species, and (to paint in very broad strokes) prevents us all from killing each other.

It is no accident that I am now having this conversation with you now.

What do you mean by this? Did someone ask you to comment here on this article?

Ask yourself these questions:
Do you have trouble accepting any form of authority?

“Any” form of authority? Yes. “Some” authority, I’m okay with. For me (and I assume most people), authority must be earned and respected. There are a lot of authorities in my life (from personal to public) that I respect and defer to.

Did you rebel against your parents?

Yes. That’s part of growing out of childhood and establishing independance as an adult.

Are you suffering from a deep pain in your past either self inflicted or externally inflicted?

Yes. Most anyone who’s lived any amount of time will have suffered. That’s how life works.

If you are honest with yourself and if you answer yes to those questions you are in need to examine what you believe because it isn’t working.

I don’t understand what those questions have to do with the original concept of not accepting a claim (human-created electricity generation) without proper evidence. I’m not being intentionally “obtuse”, I really just don’t see the connection. How do these questions relate to critical thought? Or is this a topic change to something else?

I invite you to really search your soul and see why you attack everyone who holds a different opinion from you.

That statement is incorrect. That’s not what I do.

For what I do, here’s my original purpose in creating Digital Bits Skeptic. The second paragraph applies closely to this discussion:

“Digital Bits Skeptic is about promoting critical thinking and skepticism. This site was created as a response to the frustratingly large amount of credulity and scientific ignorance in today’s society.

A skeptical outlook in life is healthy. At the very least, it prevents you from wasting your time or money. At the most, it can save lives. Much of what we see reported in today’s media is overly credulous. Impressive claims are often accepted as fact, without question. Those that are questioned are often not tested scientifically to prove the claim.”

Andy

2009 August 18
Robert/snoglydox permalink

I believe feelings/moods originate from the endocrine system, but that is not my expertise.

2009 August 18
Demolishun permalink

First, you can’t equate electricity to human emotion. They’re not the same thing. Second, the description you give can be described by emotional manipulation of a subject.
That was not the case.  You have to actually experience what I experienced to understand.  It was a deviation from the original topic and is not intended to explain the phenomenon of electrical malfunction.  It was an attempt to get you to understand that there are phenomena that can’t be explained by a wholly scientific point of view.  Of course some people believe physical reality is all there is so cannot fully grasp things that cannot be explained physically.  With a proper perspective faith and science are partners is uncovering the truth of existence no matter how strange it ends up being.  Notice I did not say religion, as when science and religion meet it is often unyielding when obvious truths are discovered.  This leads to misunderstanding and a departure from a pure truth finding journey.  People become polarized and distant with no further growth.  Having said that, science needs to be careful to also be open to change when truths about existence are discovered which science is no longer an expert.  Two way street.  There was a scientist that did a study about theories and he found that it takes 30 years for new theories to take hold.  You have to wait for the old scientists to die before advances can be “accepted” by the experts. 

So, this is a long winded offer to be open and understand that a non-scientific point of view is not without merit.  Besides, breakthroughs are usually discovered when someone from another field comes in and does not know that something is impossible when everyone in that field says it is.
For instance, the natural gas liquefaction experts did not believe a small scale liquefaction plant could be built.  The experts had tried for years some 40 – 5o years ago to build one and could not make it work.  The technical barriers were too great and costly.  Consequently natural gas liquefaction plants take acres to build.  That was until a group of people I am lucky to associate with theorized, designed, and built a small scale liquefaction plant that fits on the bed of a semi truck trailer.  It works, and according to experts, could not be built.  It was faith in self that made it possible and there were plenty of skeptics.  Lesson: you don’t know what you don’t know.  Most breakthroughs depend on some form of faith.
Skepticism has its place, but if all you do is maintain existing thinking, then no progress will take place.  A great example where it has harmed us is Ponz and Fleischman (not sure on spelling).  I examined their theory, it is sound.  The experts in high energy physics however, did not extend them the same courtesy and made public statements designed to discredit them.  Why would they do that?  Over a billion dollars in threatened research dollars is why.  Where is Ponz and Fleischman?  They have a 50K square foot research facility in France.
If you are not an expert in spiritual things then leave it be.  That way you will not alienate a large portion of those who would take part in this fascinating discussion.  Also, back to the idea that I was manipulated, I don’ think it was the case.  I have been to many hypnotist shows and I have never been able to be hypnotised.  There is something in my brain that just won’t allow it, at least in a public setting like that.  Not sure if a therapist could, that would be an interesting experiment!
Much of what we see reported in today’s media is overly credulous.

I would change that statement to: Most of what we see reported in today’s media is wholly fabricated and a perversion of the truth whether it be scientific or a supposed unbiased view of events.  Lets not go down that line of discussion.  That would be productive. :)  To much emotion in me on that one.
To the media’s defense on reporting, I would ask, do we really want to subject everyone to testing their claims as we already know it takes 30 years for new theories to be accepted?  This would allow experts to effectively monopolize innovation and stop progress.  Hmmm, sounds like what we get mad at oil companies for doing…  Time and is the ultimate skeptic and is cruel in judgment to charlatans and deceivers. 

2009 August 18

Demolishun,

It was an attempt to get you to understand that there are phenomena that can’t be explained by a wholly scientific point of view.

Thanks for clarifying this point.

When I have conversations about the supernatural, there are two big differences in mindset:

1) I generally have a higher requirement for a burden of proof. That is, a “believer” (for lack of a better generic term) tends to accept evidence that I don’t consider legitimate.

2) In order to verify a process is natural or supernatural, I like to test it first to determine what process is at play. I have not yet found a situation that can’t be explained using known physical laws or by human psychology.

That’s where I’m coming from with conversations like this one. When discussing religion or faith, however, I’m not going to argue with you (not much, anyway!)  I can’t tell you how you feel, or even why – but I can tell you about my own experience which may relate. Also, I don’t have a problem with religion, not when it’s a personal religion that doesn’t affect anyone else. Where I have problem are when a religion affects others, or when religious belief increases the incidence of non-critical thought. The latter – non-critical thought – often matches well with religious faith. People of faith often seem to have lower standards of skepticism and higher incidence in supernatural belief, since, well, that’s a core component of their life.

With all that said, I also wanted to say that I’m perfectly willing to state, “I don’t know!” about a particular problem (not the problem described in the parent post in this article – that one I’m pretty sure we could determine some answers if we could just get people to start testing their claims). We can’t know everything. But my opinion is that I don’t see enough evidence to support a supernatural explanantion. And I don’t think it makes any sense to jump to a supernatural explanation, since that’s a less-logical version of “I don’t know”.

If you are not an expert in spiritual things then leave it be.

One side of me really agrees with you here. I fully understand your meaning and where you’re coming from. But there’s another side: am I then allowed to say, “If you are not an expert in technical things then leave it be”?

As I stated above, I don’t really have a problem with such issues, except when they affect others. In this case, I argue, it does.

Skepticism has its place, but if all you do is maintain existing thinking, then no progress will take place

This is not what skepticism does. It’s open to new ideas, given evidence enough to prove those ideas.

To the media’s defense on reporting, I would ask, do we really want to subject everyone to testing their claims

YES. Or if not have the media test everything, at least know that the claimants can prove what they claim. Otherwise we open the door to scams and abuse. What’s wrong with being able to back up what you say? I’m not talking about religious matters, like your personal experience with a holy man. I’m talking about products that make a particular claim, those that can indeed be tested.

Time is the ultimate skeptic and is cruel in judgment to charlatans and deceivers.

On this, I agree completely.

Andy

2009 August 19
Demolishun permalink

What’s wrong with being able to back up what you say?
I don’t want the media telling me what is true and is not true.  I would rather use my judgement and experience to determine if something will do what it says.  We are scammed because we do not think as a culture.  There are already a plethora of rules that do make companies back up what they say.  The FDA being a huge one. 

I deal with this problem every day as I directly deal with a product that is considered a food product.  You have to walk a fine line when saying certain things or you walk into the realm of making drug claims.  Most of the issue deals with educating people about their health.  Because people are ignorant of their own health and have never taken the time to learn they fall for every fad diet.  They never develop self discipline and think nothing works after a while. 

A good example is science is learning that most disease are prevented by proper nutrition.  Practically nobody has proper nutrition.  Our product provides the proper nutrition.  It does NOT cure diseases even though proper nutrition prevents most diseases.  Messy isn’t it?  Otherwise you are making a drug claim…
Protection is good in most cases, but it can make explaining a product difficult.

2009 August 19
Robert/snoglydox permalink

Demolishun,
What is “considered a food product” and “proper nutrition” at your workplace, that you are worried about alpha particles getting on your clothing? Alpha particles are deadly to ingest!

2009 September 21
Rudy Machuca permalink

I too have  this very cool power. Ever since I was little I have been able to shoot out electricity out of my hands. Some times I would be walking by an object and before I even get a foot close to it I would shoot out a bolt of electricity. The first time I actually did this I ended up getting very weak, as if someone drained me of my energy. I recently been working on suppressing the energy and then releasing it out. If possible I want to learn how to shoot it out across a room.

2009 September 23

Rudy,

That’s a cool power. Can you give us a video? Link to it here, or email it to me directly, and I’ll post it for you.

A picture would be fine, too.

Andy

2009 September 23
Robert/snoglydox permalink

Rudy,

When you are ready, you will know; and remember, most will not except you, so you must keep it a secret.

2009 September 23

With that said, let’s close this thread. I don’t think we’re advancing the conversation much at this point. But if anyone (particularly those who claim electrical zapping power) wants to continue this in a new article with some double-blind testing and proper controls, let me know.

Andy

Comments are closed for this entry.