<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women in skepticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbskeptic.com/2008/06/09/women-in-skepticism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2008/06/09/women-in-skepticism/</link>
	<description>Skepticism. Critical thinking. Podcast. Community.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lippard</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2008/06/09/women-in-skepticism/#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lippard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=88#comment-436</guid>
		<description>I think there's something to the criticism that skeptics tend to be people who are overly intellectual and underly (if that's a word) emotional, a characteristic that's also common among techies and other sorts of geeks.  Women are less likely to go to extremes in that direction--they have a tendency to consider the emotional and social to be of greater importance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s something to the criticism that skeptics tend to be people who are overly intellectual and underly (if that&#8217;s a word) emotional, a characteristic that&#8217;s also common among techies and other sorts of geeks.  Women are less likely to go to extremes in that direction&#8211;they have a tendency to consider the emotional and social to be of greater importance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
