The future of skepticism

2008 September 6

By Andy Kaiser
Article ID: 1247

Things are getting worse.

Across the world, we’ve got so-called complementary and alternative medicine infiltrating legitimate healthcare and medical treatments. The United States government seems more interested in supporting Christianity than supporting religious choice. There are attacks on preventative sciences, like Jenny McCarthy and others insisting their understanding of vaccination technology trumps that of any medical doctor.

While I could argue that skepticism is making progress in places, like against the fringe beliefs of cryptozoology, astrology and Intelligent Design, it’s even easier to argue that we’re losing the battle. Logic and common sense are failing and falling, supported by the beliefs of a credulous society.

We are losing. What’s a skeptic to do?

I fully expect that things will get worse. Yet, despite this gloomy outlook, I’m not worried.

Let’s do a little scrying of our own, a little fortune-telling and future-prediction. The difference between this and reading tea-leaves is that mine is an educated guess based on probabilities and human nature.

Think about a possible future for healthcare. Let’s assume the worst for the skeptical community. Let’s assume we live in a world where people believe vaccinations cause autism and don’t actually protect against disease. What will happen? As fewer people become immunized, herd immunity will break down. Entire communities will again become susceptible. We will see outbreaks and epidemics of preventable diseases like measles, mumps and rubella. We’ll see previously-eradicated diseases like polio and leprosy resurface and spread through populations. Many people will get sick. Many people will die.

The human response will be to analyze and respond. Doctors and biologists and groups like the Center for Disease Control will again stress the importance of immunizations. This goes far beyond the current polite and low-publicity efforts. We’ll get massive ad campaigns, increased TV coverage and a flood of data supporting and explaining the science behind immunizations. The information has always been out there for those interested in finding it, but in this Sick New World, immunization science will be shoved down our throats. People will immunize because they actually understand the process, the risks, and the benefits.

This scenario specifically addresses the anti-vaccination problem. But the long-term results are applicable across the board, from alternative-medicine to Scientology. If left unchecked, eventually enough people will get abused, hurt and killed. There will be an inevitable backlash as people come to their senses.

As skeptics and critical thinkers, our job is to make sure this imagined world, if it does come to pass, passes quickly. If we can prevent it from happening, even better. If we can’t prevent it, nature will do the job for us, though the results will be horrifying and deadly. Our job as skeptics will be to ensure this happens sooner rather than later.

Our first obligation is to take care of our family, friends and those closest to us. Then work to educate the wider community and the world at large.

The above example addresses healthcare. But a lack of critical thinking causes plenty of other problems in our society.

Scammers will always be around unless we increase people’s exposure to critical thinking. There will always be people trying to take advantage of others, and there will always be people ready to believe lies. We can lessen the damage with education and activism.

Religion is another issue. At its best, it’s a good cause that exists for the wrong reasons. At its worst, we get intolerance, persecution and death. Contributing to religion’s existence are blind belief in tradition, reliance on unjustified moral laws, and the very human trait of being scared of the dark. Critical thinking and a desire for knowledge can help define what religion really is, an ancient superstition, created at a time when people needed answers and didn’t know any better. Religion serves much the same role today. It shouldn’t have to.

The outcomes for these problems are definite. The world will get better, but the method of getting to that point can be easy or painful. We have a moral obligation to force the outcome sooner rather than later. We must save lives. We must prevent abuse of innocent people. We must advance science and advocate against the pursuit of nonsense.

The above points are why I believe – even in this credulous world – skepticism has already won. I say this not because we’re winning right now, but because the win is inevitable. The evidence is out there, and that counts more than my beliefs, your beliefs, or the beliefs of the most strident fundamentalist.

Some of us can be satisfied with this, knowing that skepticism and critical thinking will win in the end. These people need only to wait. For those not satisfied, and for those who feel the pull of the moral obligation to save lives, get out there. Help our world now. As skeptics, as critical thinkers, as humans, it’s the right thing to do.



Other articles related to this topic:

6 Comments
2008 September 6
Thomas permalink

Meet Christian Girls Free
Meet / Chat with Christian Singles 100% Free to Join. Enjoy Today.

That is the google ad right below your article.

Great paper, a joy to read.

2008 September 6

Thomas,

I don’t have much control over which ads show – this is determined by Google. Read more detail at this link.

Thanks,

Andy

2008 September 8
starlatk permalink

“Scammers will always be around unless we increase people’s exposure to critical thinking. There will always be people trying to take advantage of others, and there will always be people ready to believe lies. We can lessen the damage with education and activism… Critical thinking and a desire for knowledge can help define what religion really is, an ancient superstition, created at a time when people needed answers and didn’t know any better. Religion serves much the same role today. It shouldn’t have to.”

Now, maybe you’ve shied away from the other obvious manipulator of false thoughts, as naming it in this current landscape may be getting into tricky (and perhaps unbiased) territory. However, it is important to recognize the role of politics and the media in these times of waning skepticism. Let’s take out the actualities of who’s campaign said what and when on what channel… but instead look at how millions of millions of citizens can be easily swayed into believing things that may or may not be true through political statements and talking heads, and media manipulation of topics.

These are such powerful tools, as any social observer knows. Historically, they have not always been used in the same way, or for the same reason, as they are today. Political campaigns, political parties, and the use of political situations were much different, even when we were children. Almost any event (like a natural disaster or a child learning to read), can be turned into a political strategy piece for a campaign. This is done so with help from the Media, which has also changed tremendously. Are media outlets unbiased? Do they give the whole story? Are they true to relaying real information, or instead writing in order to sell? And if a news source is relaying the most accurate information, how are we the public aware of its accuracy- where can we put our trust?

I’m only touching on the issues here, but I believe that these two forces (Politics and Media) are some of the most powerful influencers of public thought (for the good or for the worse). They should be recognized as such in order for critical thinking to survive along with these modern social messengers into the future.

2008 December 25

Hi Andy,

I’m having a hard time figuring out if you’re being serious. Vaccines are causing autism and there is in fact a conspiracy to cover this up and it is part of a large worldwide program.

That last part of course can be dismissed offhand but you need to actually study the area before your “critical logical thinking skills” get involved. But here’s an article for starters (and this is just the tip of the iceberg regarding evidence, you should try google, have you?)

And one more thing. Do you realize you’re acting as a camouflage to getting this information out there by glossing over it, and so complicit in the crime and now answerable to millions of kids? What is your answer to these children now that you’ve spread lies of this magnitude in a public forum? I think the answer is to take down the article.

———

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the federal agency that oversees the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), recently conceded the first vaccine-autism case.

This case was filed in the no-fault National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program as part of the Autism Omnibus proceedings in the U.S. Federal Court of Claims.

It was one of the first three cases chosen that alleged Thimerosal in childhood vaccines significantly contributed to a child developing autism.

Clifford Shoemaker, of Shoemaker and Associates of Vienna, Virginia, is the attorney of record in the Hanna Poling v. Secretary of HHS (case: 02-1466V).

Experts filing on behalf of the petitioner, Hanna Poling, included pediatric neurologist, Dr. Andrew Zimmerman of Johns Hopkins University, and Maryland geneticist and epidemiologist, Dr. Mark Geier of the Genetic Centers of America.

This concession shows the dishonesty of the continual media spin coming from public health officials and others who maintain there is no evidence that Thimerosal, or any other part of any vaccine, has ever caused autism or, for that matter, has harmed anyone in any way.

The facts are that the Vaccine Compensation Act has already compensated over 2,000 individuals who proved that they were harmed by vaccines, resulting in settlements of nearly two billion dollars.

Additionally, hundreds of peer-reviewed scientific/medical articles from some the world’s best universities have long implicated Thimerosal in vaccines as a causal factor in neurodevelopmental disorders including autism.

Furthermore, in 2003, the U.S. House of Representatives’ Government Reform Committee, after a 3.5-year investigation, concluded that Thimerosal caused the autism epidemic and that the FDA and health authorities were guilty of “institutional malfeasance” in covering it up.

Evidence supporting the connection between mercury and autism include:

1. Published studies from the US and France showing that urinary porphyrins, a biomarker for body-burden of mercury, are elevated in patients diagnosed with autistic disorders (http://www.mercury-freedrugs.org).

2. A published study by researchers at Harvard University that found twice as much mercury and oxidative stress in the brains of those with an autism diagnosis as found in the brains of those who were normal.

3. A study from the US showing a significant relationship between increasing blood mercury levels and an increased risk of a diagnosis of an autistic disorder.

4. Numerous papers by independent researchers showing a link between increasing mercury exposure from childhood vaccines and the risk of a child developing an autistic disorder.

5. Several papers showing that adding low levels of Thimerosal to certain blood, brain, eye, immune, liver and/or muscle cells poisons their cellular mitochondrial pathways and can induce cell death.

Today, despite being banned in Europe and restricted in 7 U.S. states, Thimerosal-containing flu vaccines are still recommended for routine administration to pregnant women and infants, with little or no warning of the presence of this known poison in these and other vaccines.

Vaccines have and will continue to save many lives. However, an immediate ban and recall of vaccines and other drugs containing mercury compounds used in their production must be instituted immediately to stop the epidemic of developmental disorders, including autism, caused by the unsound use of mercury in medicine.

For more information, please visit CoMeD’s website:

http://www.mercury-freedrugs.org

———————
What is your answer to the children Andy? And what’s your rebuttal, is it just that you haven’t heard of this autism and metals connection and assumed it wrong because the govt and corp. controlled media programmed you to trust them? Also, do you work for a vaccine company? Come out with it.

2008 December 26

Hi Ty,

Thanks for the response. Due to the length of what you’ve written, and me trying to survive the US holidays, it’ll take me a little while to respond. But I’ll have an answer for you, and will post that answer to this article.

Andy

2008 December 26

Andy I won’t respond even if I want to because it’s too important to me. Me being hostile never changes someones actions and I only truly unload on someone when I think their argument is very harmful to people so don’t take it on a personal level. I don’t know, maybe you influence lots of people on this site.

Look you seem to be able to reason and everyone including me has lots of wrong assumptions and opinions because no one has studied everything and has prejudice, so I ask you to read the arguments against this type of vaccine and consult yourself and do as you will.

You could study the fraud in the danish study as well as Bush admin’s false promises of the thimerisol being removed and the still controversial flu vaccine and other vaccine additives.
There’s lots of research connecting thimerisol to autism and this has a following in science.

Regarding the coverup conspiracy I mentioned, below is a link tying together big pharma with news outlets re: vaccines and how that works. There is more on this at counterpunch .com and other alternative media sites. Also I recommend counterpunch to anyone as an excellent site for politics, it isn’t dem or repub:
http://www.counterpunch.org/dachel09272007.html
Best,
Boyd (ty)

Comments are closed for this entry.