Original versions of classic fairy tales

2008 October 27

By Andy Kaiser
Article ID: 1257

[This article is a companion piece to "More original meanings of classic fairy tales".]

 

“Oh Grandmother, what big ears you have!”

“All the better to hear you with, my dear.”

“Oh Grandmother, what big eyes you have!”

“All the better to see you with, my dear.”

“Oh Grandmother, what big hands you have!”

“All the better to grab you with, my dear.”

“Oh Grandmother, what big teeth you have!”

“All the better to eat you with, my dear.”

Little Red Riding Hood

Thus begins the true terror of Little Red Riding Hood. Do you know what happens in the original story? Find out, and this Halloween you may think twice when you see certain costumes. This Digital Bits Skeptic article keeps to the usual credo of skepticism and critical thinking. But since it’s a Halloween special, it also gets pretty creepy.

A quick alert to parents and teachers - this article doesn’t have forbidden words, but revealing the dark nature of beloved childrens’ fairy tales may be too much for young kids.

It’s almost Halloween. In less than five days, young children will dress up, put on makeup or a mask, and knock on strangers’ doors, expecting oodles of free candy. And they get it. The kids are happy, the strangers are happy, everyone wins except dental insurance companies.

When I was younger, the cool costumes were made from anyone from the Star Wars movies. I too donned the smelly, sweaty plastic mask, and trick-or-treated as Darth Vader. Being probably three feet tall made me a much less imposing figure.

My friends all did the same. Movies and TV shows dictated our choices. A costumed resurgence occurred at the time Disney started remaking classic fairy tales, like The Little Mermaid and Beauty and the Beast, and rereleasing older movies like Cinderella and Snow White.

The Little MermaidThe Little Mermaid was big. Girls everywhere dressed up like Ariel and knew line-by-line the story of unrequited love eventually rewarded.

Yet, this isn’t the original story. Did you know that the original Little Mermaid story by Hans Christian Anderson ended with the Little Mermaid’s death? She essentially committed suicide because she was unwilling to kill the prince, who was already married to someone else.

It’s not quite the happy Disney ending. Yet, I remember being a kid, being somehow more satisfied when I heard the “real” endings of fairy tales. It’s like watching the TV-edited version of an R-rated movie. The R-rated version is invariably better, and was the director’s original intent. Even though the original fairy tale storylines deal with nasty issues, they are truer than hiding behind a Disney-esque ending. They reflect the original violent themes of some fairy tales: that the world is a dangerous place, certain behavior is tolerated and some isn’t, and some people are here to protect you, and some will hurt you.

For those who really like to dig deep, fairy tales also involve heavy symbolism and psychology. The Hansel and Gretel story is an examination of children’s emotional growth and eventual rejection of parental supervision. Many tales (like Little Red Riding Hood, Rapunzel, and Sleeping Beauty) have a heavily sexual tone, and explore sexual awakening and desire.

Now that we’ve mentioned sex and violence, let’s get to it and find about the original versions of classic fairy tales.

The original story of The Three Little Pigs

The Three Little Pigs

The Three Little Pigs is sanitized for today’s children by telling the violence-packed story without the violence. We’re left with a cautionary tale that shows how being smart is a good thing. The original has lost a lot. The original Three Little Pigs is a lot longer, as the Big Bad Wolf doesn’t stick with blowing down houses. He does do that to get the first two little pigs. Those unfortunate morsels are quickly terrorized and eaten. The third pig - the smart one - is the holdout. Unable to blow down the third pig’s house, the wolf tries guile. He tries to tempt the pig out of the house, promising turnips, apples, and a visit to a fair. The pig rejects the temptation for immediate gratification, knowing that there are more important issues.

The wolf then decides to go back to violence. He climbs the pig’s house, and enters through the chimney. But the pig has planned ahead, and has started boiling a huge pot of water in the fireplace. The wolf falls down the chimney, into the pot, and boils to death. He - and the two other pigs still in his stomach - are now a gruesome dinner for the third pig.

The morals of the original Three Little Pigs: Don’t give in to temptation. Grow up and be smart, or die.

The original story of Hansel and Gretel

Hansel and Gretel

Hansel and Gretel is often told as two fun-loving kids who, while exploring a forest, find a gingerbread house. They eat some of it, and the owner of the house invites them in and gives them dinner. Then the owner, revealed as an evil witch, tries to eat the children. They escape.

The original Hansel and Gretel spends as much time on getting to the house as on the events in the house itself. You see Hansel and Gretel are siblings, and their parents are very poor. So poor, their mother realizes she has no food for the children. So she conspires with the father to kick Hansel and Gretel out of their house. The kids leave the house to look for food on their own. In order to find their way back, Hansel leaves a trail of white pebbles, then another trail of breadcrumbs. But birds eat the breadcrumbs and the kids get lost, only then to find the gingerbread house.

The witch invites in Hansel and Gretel and gives them good food and comfy beds. Four weeks later, the witch reveals her true self: she’s been fattening up the kids so she can eat them. She has an oven all prepared, and has tied up Hansel, preventing his escape. But quick-thinking Gretel pushes the witch into the oven. The children then ransack the witch’s home for valuables and find their way home with the help of a white duck. Upon returning, they find their mother has died. They present the valuables to their father where, the story says, “they lived together in perfect joy”.

The morals of the original Hansel and Gretel: You must be able to survive on your own without the help of your parents. If you must depend on someone, depend on people your own age. The material world is tempting and spiritually dangerous.

The original story of Little Red Riding Hood (also called “Little Red Cap“)

Little Red Riding Hood

This is a story of a little girl wearing a red cloak and hood, walking through the forest to deliver a basket of goodies to her grandmother. She was assigned this task by her mother, who warned her not to stray from the path, no matter how tempting. A wolf is stalking her, and realizing Little Red’s destination, decides to capitalize by eating both Little Red and her grandmother. The wolf meets Little Red in the forest, and convinces her to stray from the path and look around, causing her to waste time while the wolf speeds towards the Grandma’s house. The wolf eats the grandmother, disguises himself in her clothing, and waits patiently in the Grandma’s bed.

Little Red Riding Hood arrives, and then we have the immortal lines beginning with “Oh Grandmother, what big ears you have!” At the final line, the wolf grabs Little Red and eats her.

A new character is then introduced, that of a hunter, who may have been tracking the wolf. The hunter bursts in to the Grandma’s house. Knowing that using his gun may also kill the two trapped ladies, he grabs a pair of scissors and cuts open the wolf’s stomach. A red hood is the first thing to emerge. Little Red Riding hood and her grandmother tumble out. Both are still alive. The wolf is still alive. Then Little Red collects a bunch of heavy rocks, and puts them into the still-open stomach of the wolf. She sews up the stomach. The wolf tries to run, but due to the weight of rocks in its belly, it falls down and dies. After this bloody retribution, the hunter keeps and wears the wolf’s skin, the grandma gets her basket of goodies, and Little Red knows she will never be distracted from the footpath again.

Some versions of the story have a highly sexual overtone between Little Red Riding Hood and the wolf. One translation has Little Red strip naked and climb into bed with the wolf. When Little Red remarks on “Grandma’s” powerful arms, the response is “All the better to embrace you, my dear.” At no point does Little Red make a move to escape or fight back this blatant seduction.

The morals of the original Little Red Riding Hood: Don’t allow yourself to be distracted from your goals. Heed the wisdom of your parents. If you don’t, you will gain experience, though the process may be painful. A mature, controlled person can be sexually powerful without being threatening.

The original story of Sleeping Beauty

Sleeping Beauty

Sleeping Beauty is another fairy tale with a weird sexual twist. In original, non-censored versions, the young maiden is certainly not woken with a kiss.

Sleeping Beauty falls into a hundred-year sleep due to a curse by an evil fairy. The curse stated that she would sleep after being pricked in the finger by a spinning wheel. This of course happens, and our heroine falls asleep.

A prince arrives, and falls in lust with the sleeping girl. He rapes her. She becomes pregnant, and - still sleeping - gives birth to twins. The twins crawl out of her and feed from her. During one feeding, one of the babies accidentally starts sucking on a finger instead of a breast, and sucks out a splinter of wood under Sleeping Beauty’s fingernail. The curse is broken, and Sleeping Beauty wakes up.

The morals of the original Sleeping Beauty: Progress and advancement does not have to be seen in order to happen. Trying to prevent a child’s sexual awakening is impossible. Sometimes you have to wait a long time for sexual satisfaction. Children are not just parasitic - they can also help the parents.

Conclusion

Many of the classic fairy tales were not addressed in this article. You may notice exclusions like Beauty and the Beast, Jack and the Beanstalk, Snow White, Cinderella, Rapunzel, Goldilocks and the Three Bears, and others. Much like the Big Bad Wolf, these stories must be brutally sacrificed at the expense of others. I didn’t want to push too far in time or length. However, if there is interest, there will be another article. If you’d like to hear a sequel with more origins of popular fairy tales, leave a comment saying so at the end of this article and, as they say, “your dreams will come true”. [Editor's note: The "sequel" has been published, and is available at this link.]

We need to realize that fairy tales evolve and change based on our current social and political setting. What is normal for one culture (even just a couple hundred years ago) is violent and ugly to another.

Just because Disney made a movie out of it, don’t think one particular version of anything is The Truth. That even goes for the “original versions” mentioned in this article. Many fairy tales are extremely old, and many have multiple origins, or have merged with other stories over time.

If you want to enjoy a fairy tale for enjoyment’s sake, that’s fine. But know that your entertainment may originally have had deeper lessons about life, love, good and evil. A quality story is one that can be enjoyed on multiple levels. Those stories are worth listening to. They’re definitely worth remembering and passing on to those who can learn from them. Don’t bury the classics. Keep them alive.

 

References

Bettelheim, Bruno. 1977. The Uses of Enchantment. New York: Vintage Books.

Frank, Josette (editorial supervision). 1958. Shirley Temple’s Storybook. New York: Random House.

Heuscher, Julius. 1963. A Psychiatric Study of Fairy Tales: Their Origin, Meaning and Usefulness. Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.



Other articles related to this topic:

19 Comments leave one →
2008 October 27
starlatk permalink

Neat article to read, yet with a somewhat uneasy feeling- just as some fairy tale picture books made me feel when reading them as a young girl. I remember reading the words and seeing smoky and mysterious pictures, gloomy landscapes, and many many dark forests. Yet they always made you want to go back and read more.

This article talks too about modern interpretations of old traditions- reflecting the change of cultural behaviors and preferences. Although the original stories do carry much heavier morals, I think I’d prefer (overall) reading our modern interpretations to young children today. Discovering the true/original stories when you’re old enough is like a new adventure itself.

Can we have more adventures??

2008 October 27

Like Star says above, I definitely prefer the new stories for children nowadays. However, reading the old versions as an adult is quite fun. Much like finally seeing the uncut version of a movie you’ve always seen on TV. I’d definitely like to see more : )

2008 October 28
alkali wolf permalink

I stumbled across your article, and I have to say I really enjoyed it. It reminds me a little of “Women Who Run With the Wolves” - and that’ s a good thing. I hope you do a longer followup soon.

2008 October 28
Erin permalink

Fascinating! More please :)

2008 October 28
Amanda permalink

great article, more please!

2008 October 28
kleah permalink

I’ve been researching fairy tales as part of my internship with my English professor who’s writing a thesis on this topic. I must say… older generations do have quite a lot of imagination when it comes to talking about taboo or the “unspeakable”….. most of these stories are there, as you said, for a purpose, carrying a moral or a lesson… I’d love to read more of what you’ve got! I especially like how brief the actual original script and how informative the connotations are… makes for a good “bed time story”!

2008 October 28

Hi everyone, it’s Andy here (the author).

Based on the so far 100% enthusiastic response and request for more, there will indeed be another article about even more classic fairy tales and their original versions.

If you want to be notified when the new article is available, then you can use one of the “Subscribe” methods at the top right of this page - Email alerts will send you an email every time a new article is published. Or, of course, you can subscribe to the podcast via iTunes or other reader.

As of right now, the new article is third on the list to be published, so you should see another article on this topic in approximately three weeks.

Thanks,

Andy

UPDATE: The new article has been published, and is available at this link.

2008 October 29

What an excellent read! Thank you.

I remember a story I read as a child, and for the life of me I cannot remember the name of it, but it was about a spoiled child, full of vanity, a pair of red shoes and a mirror that smashed into millions of pieces and got in her eyes and made her see how ugly she was, that or I imagined the whole thing!

Fairy tales are the farthest thing from Disney! But then, Disney always traumatized me as a child. I still can’t watch Fantasia. Little did I know the acid trip of a movie that it was back then! :)

Hope you’ll write Part Deux soon! I’m subscribing!

2008 October 29

Odd; I only know the ‘old’ version of The Three Little Pigs and Hansel and Gretyl. I do prefer the original Red Riding Hood, but the Sleeping Beauty with the rape and the babies is completely new to me.

2008 October 29

Miragi,

I remember a story I read as a child, and for the life of me I cannot remember the name of it

Are you maybe referring to The Snow Queen, by Hans Christian Andersen?

Thanks for subscribing!

Andy

2008 November 12
Monica permalink

Andy - Creepy, but very interesting. I would like to see more. It made me think about modern versions of these fairy tales and what possible morals we could get from them now. For example, in the Disney version of The Little Mermaid, is the moral, “If you fall in love with someone physically unattainable, you might want to take a chance on a scary witch lady. It may almost cost you your life, but if you’re lucky, your dream man will save you and you will live happily ever after?” Or you can take this one step further. How about: “Since I’m a girl, it’s ok to make a silly, selfish mistake that may potentially kill several people including myself and all my loved ones, because I’m cute and I don’t have to be smart and therefore some handsome stud will always be there to bail me out.” The Disney version is easier to swallow as a kid, but what is it really teaching our youth? On another note, let’s think about the fear involved with the original endings of some of these fairy tales. I can’t think of one person who has claimed that as a kid, he/she didn’t think there were monsters under the stairs or boogiemen in the closet. As for me, I always thought there were gremlins under my bed. I started having this fear after seeing the GREMLINS movie, of course. The fear was created by a story, just like these original fairy tales. The “moral” I could possibly associate with my gremlin fear is “don’t ever let Gizmo eat after midnight”. It seems like although the original fairy tales may be just as scary as Gremlins to little kids, the morals might be actually beneficial later in life. Maybe I shouldn’t speak too soon though…I may be talked into buying Gizmo some day….he was just so darn cute!

Note: I’m just making some (hopefully thought provoking) observations in the above paragraph. I’m not going to start tramatizing any of the kids I know by tucking them into bed after telling them a horrendous story about a wolf that eats little girls. I don’t think we’ve analyzed this enough from a psychological standpoint yet to know what is the most morally beneficial. When it comes to bedtime stories, I think for now, I’ll stick to the morals of Sesame Street, Clifford, and good old Frog and Toad.

2008 November 17

For those following this thread, the second article in this installment has been published - click for more original versions of classic fairy tales.

2008 November 17
Stacy Kennedy permalink

I respectfully disagree with your analyses. You’ve removed only the the first layer of gloss that’s been applied in order to pretty up these stories. And then you’ve interpreted them according to–Freudian psychology? I thought skeptics believed in um, you know–real science?

Take Hansel and Gretel, for instance. I’m 50 and in my day, sonny, we were always told that the kids were abandoned because their parents were too poor to take care of them–though if I remember aright the female parent was the ubiquitous “stepmother” and the father was presented as highly conflicted–he didn’t really want to expose the kids, she talked him into it–and ultimately he escapes moral censure. Everything was the wicked stepmother’s fault, and with her out of the picture, everyone can live happily ever after.

If I were going to fool around with psychological interpretations (and I would, and I will–I love this stuff)–I’d be more interested in this as a story about infanticidal impulse, and how children (attempt to) protect themselves psychologically from the intuition that their caregivers may sometimes feel resentment, rage, or worse, for them. The scary parent is doubly distanced–she’s a stepmother, not a “real” mother, then she’s a stranger with strange powers–a “witch”. Ultimately the kids (actually, in the versions of the story I’m familiar with, it’s always the daughter, Gretel) are clever and manage to kill her; they then reunite with their now-contrite papa.

If I were going to take a deeper look at this story, I’d begin by looking at the historical reality of infanticide and child abandonment. I’d also think about the ways in which people assign blame and choose scapegoats.

Torture of the “bad guys” is common at the end of the older versions of familiar fairy tales (part of the “happy ending”?); and misogyny is rampant. Placing these stories in their historical context, I think we find tales not originally intended for children, that often reflect the values and fears of the times of their origins.

I submit that the stories we call “fairy tales” have, like other folklore, lasted NOT because they offer pleasing and uplifting morals (the morals are always tacked on later anyway) but because they express raw human feelings, some decidedly un-edifying, including fear, rage, and hatred–as well as wonder, resourcefulness, and hope.

2008 November 18

Stacy,

Thanks very much for not just disagreeing, but adding to the knowledge base! Your contribution was very helpful. A note on one thing you said:

You’ve removed only the the first layer of gloss that’s been applied in order to pretty up these stories. And then you’ve interpreted them according to–Freudian psychology?

The removal of the “first layer of gloss” was my original intent in writing this article. The critical thinking aspect came from not taking fairly tales in the way they are presented to us today. That layer of gloss covers up some drastic changes, which I personally find very interesting. The psychological analysis, while perhaps more interesting to you and some others, was a secondary intent.

The one point I disagree with you on was this statement: “the morals are always tacked on later anyway” …I don’t think that’s the case. Take Cinderella (which I wrote about in this sequel article). The version by the Brothers Grimm I detailed does seem to be the original, version 1 story, where the selfish “bad” people are punished at the end. Symbolism or no, psychological interpretation or no, there’s a clear (and brutally communicated) moral message.

As for the psychological analysis, I submit that’s more subjective and open to interpretation, because we can only guess at the writer’s intent. With that said, you make excellent points, some of which could replace or add to my original analysis. Specifically, your raising the issue of the “historical reality of infanticide and child abandonment” is intriguing. This aspect never even occurred to me.

2008 November 20
Stacy Kennedy permalink

Hi Andy,

(I thought I submitted this comment yesterday; but it is either being held, or it didn’t go through, so I’ll try again!)

Thank you for your kind words. Though I’m not a professional folklorist, I’ve been interested in these stories and some other types of folklore for many years, and there’s one point I think it’s important to clarify. In your reply, you wrote (referring to “Cinderella”):

“The version by the Brothers Grimm I detailed does seem to be the original, version 1 story”–

Like most “fairy tales”, the story the English-speaking world knows as Cinderella is a very ancient story. How ancient? In their article on the story, Wikipedia says,

“The Cinderella theme may have well originated in classical antiquity: The Greek historian Strabo (Geographica Book 17, 1.33) recorded in the 1st century BC the tale of the Greco-Egyptian girl Rhodopis, which is considered the oldest known version of the story.[3] [4] Rhodopis (the “rosy-cheeked”) washes her clothes in an Ormoc stream, a task forced upon her by fellow servants, who have left to go to a function sponsored by the Pharaoh Amasis. An eagle takes her rose-gilded sandal and drops it at the feet of the Pharaoh in the city of Memphis; he then asks the women of his kingdom to try on the sandal to see which one fits….”

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinderella)

The brothers Grimm were collectors, not the authors of the stories they told. There are many earlier versions of “Cinderella” (Charles Perrault wrote a version of it in the 17th century.) Although a scant few fairy tales can be traced to particular authors, the origins of most of these stories are long-lost; they’ve been told and re-told, through the centuries and across cultures, for many years.

If you guys are already holding a comment like this, I apologize for repeating myself; I just wasn’t sure if it went through the first time!

Take care.

I

2009 February 26
tammy permalink

hi do you have any idea who wrote the original stories?
x

2009 February 26

Tammy,

Stacy’s quote in the comment above yours sums it up pretty well:

“Although a scant few fairy tales can be traced to particular authors, the origins of most of these stories are long-lost; they’ve been told and re-told, through the centuries and across cultures, for many years.”

Andy

2009 February 26
Stacy Kennedy permalink

Most of them are folklore, which means they were being told orally long before they were ever written down. Think of urban legends: In most cases nobody knows for sure who first told the story, or what the original version of the story was.

There are a few stories by known authors, for example “The Yellow Dwarf” by Madame D’Aulnoy, written in the late seventeenth or early eighteenth century. Andrew Lang included it in The Blue Fairy Book. But most of them weren’t literary creations. They were stories that were in wide circulation, told by ordinary, often illiterate people; they spread from region to region, country to country, changing some details and borrowing others as they spread.

2009 May 3
Nyul permalink

It’s relatively easy to find moral messages in fairy tales as an adult but I think it’s rather difficult for a child. If a parent wants their child to understand these messages well, they have to interpret them clearly. Otherwise the child will only remember that how gruesome was when the Evil Queen was punished. (And will have bad dreams…)
Young children tend to neglect facts that they don’t understand. (Or at least I was that kind of child.) I can still remember when I watched a czecho-slovakian film version of The Little Mermaid retelling the original story with “stepping on knives” and suicide in the end. I didn’t even understand that the mermaid died, or more likely I didn’t want to understand. I “transformed” the story in my head, and cut off the hard-to-understand scenes. But I remember clearly that I was shocked that the mermaids had LEGS! It was more important than any suicide. I really loved that film, I watched it many times even though I found it strange and made me have bad feelings.

I don’t think these original stories would benefit really little children. Or you have to be a very good storyteller to highlight the message and make the gruesome scenes less frightening. (In case of little children I think it’s really hard!) I don’t think Disney did bad thing with making these stories nicer and adding happy end. Children wouldn’t like them if there were bad ends, I know that for sure. But as they grow older they should learn about these versions as well. :)

Monica: I don’t think children are always searching for messages in fairy tales. Maybe they notice the difference between good and bad, but the won’t likely to notice deeper meanings. (I have a little cousin (4 years old) who is a pricess-fan. I don’t think she understands anything else in Disney films than “Oh, princess!” ^^;)

Leave A Comment

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published. If your comment contains more than two links, the comment will be held until an admin manually approves it.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS