<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Funny underused crude knowledge: A vulgar examination of profanity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbskeptic.com/2008/12/08/funny-underused-crude-knowledge-a-vulgar-examination-of-profanity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2008/12/08/funny-underused-crude-knowledge-a-vulgar-examination-of-profanity/</link>
	<description>Skepticism. Critical thinking. Podcast. Community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:46:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2008/12/08/funny-underused-crude-knowledge-a-vulgar-examination-of-profanity/comment-page-1/#comment-4616</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 05:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=507#comment-4616</guid>
		<description>Did you know Penn and Teller were originally going to name their show &#039;humbug&#039;?

Pretty weird, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you know Penn and Teller were originally going to name their show &#8216;humbug&#8217;?</p>
<p>Pretty weird, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Parrott</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2008/12/08/funny-underused-crude-knowledge-a-vulgar-examination-of-profanity/comment-page-1/#comment-4174</link>
		<dc:creator>M Parrott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=507#comment-4174</guid>
		<description>For the following comment I shall use the word &quot;duck&quot; in place of the word which is one letter different to it.

Imagine this, what if we were to use these words as an accepted word? If we were to use duck to teach children about sex would it still be classed as a expletive? If scientists classed ducking as a term for describing intercourse would it still be unacceptable? Why do we have to skirt around the subject if the English language provides us adequate words for it? Intercourse doesn&#039;t quite get to the point like ducking. The only reason these words are classed as any different is because of culture and how you perceive them. Their meanings, nor their sounds make them expletive, only thing that does is thing between your ears; your brain. If we used them in everyday use for their actual reason then no one would think twice to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the following comment I shall use the word &#8220;duck&#8221; in place of the word which is one letter different to it.</p>
<p>Imagine this, what if we were to use these words as an accepted word? If we were to use duck to teach children about sex would it still be classed as a expletive? If scientists classed ducking as a term for describing intercourse would it still be unacceptable? Why do we have to skirt around the subject if the English language provides us adequate words for it? Intercourse doesn&#8217;t quite get to the point like ducking. The only reason these words are classed as any different is because of culture and how you perceive them. Their meanings, nor their sounds make them expletive, only thing that does is thing between your ears; your brain. If we used them in everyday use for their actual reason then no one would think twice to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starlatk</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2008/12/08/funny-underused-crude-knowledge-a-vulgar-examination-of-profanity/comment-page-1/#comment-1548</link>
		<dc:creator>starlatk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=507#comment-1548</guid>
		<description>I recently witnessed a mother with a young daughter and baby in a stroller on the subway. She was telling the daughter to sit down- tie her shoe, don&#039;t touch, etc. etc. But every other word was a swear word like you all mention. The daughter was probably not even 3 years old.  

All I could think of was how this child, not even old enough to go to school, would soon go to school, think it normal to use profanities left and right, and not have any shame in it.  I believe this will (unfortunate as it is, its reality) put that young girl at a disadvantage, because she will have one way of expressing herself that is not respected, appreciated, or taken well as would be the language of other children who do not use the same words-- and she may not understand the difference.  Yet, she will understand that she&#039;ll get treated differently by her teachers, and her peers, and that&#039;s what will stick in her mind more than the idea of the &quot;bad words&quot;.  

This may be just my own assumption on what will happen in cases of using &#039;socially offensive&#039; words with young children.  Even when you&#039;re upset or making a point and you use &#039;bad words&#039;, the children will repeat what you say when they&#039;re upset or making a point- and they&#039;ll be treated differently because of it- that&#039;s just how our society is.  I don&#039;t think its fair to the kids, folks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently witnessed a mother with a young daughter and baby in a stroller on the subway. She was telling the daughter to sit down- tie her shoe, don&#8217;t touch, etc. etc. But every other word was a swear word like you all mention. The daughter was probably not even 3 years old.  </p>
<p>All I could think of was how this child, not even old enough to go to school, would soon go to school, think it normal to use profanities left and right, and not have any shame in it.  I believe this will (unfortunate as it is, its reality) put that young girl at a disadvantage, because she will have one way of expressing herself that is not respected, appreciated, or taken well as would be the language of other children who do not use the same words&#8211; and she may not understand the difference.  Yet, she will understand that she&#8217;ll get treated differently by her teachers, and her peers, and that&#8217;s what will stick in her mind more than the idea of the &#8220;bad words&#8221;.  </p>
<p>This may be just my own assumption on what will happen in cases of using &#8216;socially offensive&#8217; words with young children.  Even when you&#8217;re upset or making a point and you use &#8216;bad words&#8217;, the children will repeat what you say when they&#8217;re upset or making a point- and they&#8217;ll be treated differently because of it- that&#8217;s just how our society is.  I don&#8217;t think its fair to the kids, folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2008/12/08/funny-underused-crude-knowledge-a-vulgar-examination-of-profanity/comment-page-1/#comment-1354</link>
		<dc:creator>DB Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=507#comment-1354</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;[My personal theory about profanity...]&lt;/i&gt;

“Listen to me. The only people who worry about language are politicians, diplomats or people trying to sell stuff - those who make a living by offending as few people as possible. Look, life is all about offending people. With our line of work, you can&#039;t help it. And when you scream out &#039;shirt that hurt&#039;, you know what happens?”

Young Clone began to shake his head.

“I&#039;ll tell you. People don&#039;t take you seriously. They think you&#039;re an idiot for making up a cutesy saying to simulate the real thing. If you want to foul the air with your words, then do it. The point of language is to communicate. The point of swearing is to communicate loudly. Don&#039;t overdo it, or people will think you&#039;re an idiot. Best to do it when when you&#039;re trying to make an impression. Either during extreme emotion or to help punctuate a joke.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>[My personal theory about profanity...]</i></p>
<p>“Listen to me. The only people who worry about language are politicians, diplomats or people trying to sell stuff &#8211; those who make a living by offending as few people as possible. Look, life is all about offending people. With our line of work, you can&#8217;t help it. And when you scream out &#8216;shirt that hurt&#8217;, you know what happens?”</p>
<p>Young Clone began to shake his head.</p>
<p>“I&#8217;ll tell you. People don&#8217;t take you seriously. They think you&#8217;re an idiot for making up a cutesy saying to simulate the real thing. If you want to foul the air with your words, then do it. The point of language is to communicate. The point of swearing is to communicate loudly. Don&#8217;t overdo it, or people will think you&#8217;re an idiot. Best to do it when when you&#8217;re trying to make an impression. Either during extreme emotion or to help punctuate a joke.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Podblack</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2008/12/08/funny-underused-crude-knowledge-a-vulgar-examination-of-profanity/comment-page-1/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>Podblack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 15:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=507#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>You might like to check out Dr Karen Stollznow.
www.skepbitch.wordpress.com and www.bad-language.com.
Her PhD is in profanity. She is also a member of the Skeptic Zone podcast (geeze, do I have a trend going on or what...) - and the executive of the Australian Skeptics and Editor in Chief of the Australian Skeptic mag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might like to check out Dr Karen Stollznow.<br />
<a href="http://www.skepbitch.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.skepbitch.wordpress.com</a> and <a href="http://www.bad-language.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bad-language.com</a>.<br />
Her PhD is in profanity. She is also a member of the Skeptic Zone podcast (geeze, do I have a trend going on or what&#8230;) &#8211; and the executive of the Australian Skeptics and Editor in Chief of the Australian Skeptic mag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Steenwyk</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2008/12/08/funny-underused-crude-knowledge-a-vulgar-examination-of-profanity/comment-page-1/#comment-1184</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Steenwyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=507#comment-1184</guid>
		<description>Words are words, but words lose their meaning if used too much. The &quot;big&quot; swear words should be saved for special occasions in my opinion, like when you drop a hammer on your toe. Just the act of swearing seems to help take the pain away : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Words are words, but words lose their meaning if used too much. The &#8220;big&#8221; swear words should be saved for special occasions in my opinion, like when you drop a hammer on your toe. Just the act of swearing seems to help take the pain away : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad tittle</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2008/12/08/funny-underused-crude-knowledge-a-vulgar-examination-of-profanity/comment-page-1/#comment-1183</link>
		<dc:creator>brad tittle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=507#comment-1183</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m witcha. As Niven pointed out (and several others I am sure), a word is only evil if you think it is. &quot;Bleep&quot; caused one of his characters to laugh, because it was profane. Everyone failed to recognize that &quot;Bleep&quot; was the word used to blank out the bad words in the past and as a result Bleep took their place. I don&#039;t worry about them. Sometimes they get used, sometimes not. Penn and Teller use it a little too much, but that is only because my wife is too sensitive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m witcha. As Niven pointed out (and several others I am sure), a word is only evil if you think it is. &#8220;Bleep&#8221; caused one of his characters to laugh, because it was profane. Everyone failed to recognize that &#8220;Bleep&#8221; was the word used to blank out the bad words in the past and as a result Bleep took their place. I don&#8217;t worry about them. Sometimes they get used, sometimes not. Penn and Teller use it a little too much, but that is only because my wife is too sensitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2008/12/08/funny-underused-crude-knowledge-a-vulgar-examination-of-profanity/comment-page-1/#comment-1182</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=507#comment-1182</guid>
		<description>I myself love profanity at all times. Profanity is especially hilarious when children use it. However, due to family influences, I have never cussed in front of my children once they could understand. 

Although I do remember hearing the baby repeat &quot;Damn baby, damn baby!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I myself love profanity at all times. Profanity is especially hilarious when children use it. However, due to family influences, I have never cussed in front of my children once they could understand. </p>
<p>Although I do remember hearing the baby repeat &#8220;Damn baby, damn baby!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
