<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DRM is failure in action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/18/drm-is-failure-in-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/18/drm-is-failure-in-action/</link>
	<description>Skepticism. Critical thinking. Podcast. Community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 08:04:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/18/drm-is-failure-in-action/comment-page-1/#comment-1336</link>
		<dc:creator>DB Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=615#comment-1336</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback, Dave! Good or bad, it&#039;s very helpful.

Also thanks for the information on the gaming industry. That&#039;s an arguably bigger can of worms than the publishing industry. 

Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback, Dave! Good or bad, it&#8217;s very helpful.</p>
<p>Also thanks for the information on the gaming industry. That&#8217;s an arguably bigger can of worms than the publishing industry. </p>
<p>Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/18/drm-is-failure-in-action/comment-page-1/#comment-1333</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=615#comment-1333</guid>
		<description>Great episode. The issue of piracy and DRM is a hot-button topic in the hardcore video game community, especially in the PC sector of that industry. TweakGuides did a very good and thorough examination of that debate here:

http://www.tweakguides.com/Piracy_1.html

I&#039;m on the same side of the debate as you, but in the PC gaming industry, piracy (and the response to it) has been a largely destructive force. Many publishers have either dropped projects altogether in favor of releasing them on home consoles instead, or have expanded DRM to the extreme.

The most likely solution, with PC gaming at least, will be digital distribution models, such as the very popular Steam service by Valve Software. The user has a Steam account to which all of his or her purchases are tied. They are free to download the game as often as they want and on as many different machines as they want, as long as the user is signed in to his or her Steam account at the time they are playing the game. This does not reduce piracy to 0%, but it has proven to be far more effective than everything else in the PC gaming DRM arena.

This episode of DBS was great. For general feedback about DBS, I would personally like it if you could expand on subjects a tad more in the episodes, making longer segments, but then I suppose it wouldn&#039;t really be &quot;bits&quot; anymore. Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great episode. The issue of piracy and DRM is a hot-button topic in the hardcore video game community, especially in the PC sector of that industry. TweakGuides did a very good and thorough examination of that debate here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tweakguides.com/Piracy_1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.tweakguides.com/Piracy_1.html</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m on the same side of the debate as you, but in the PC gaming industry, piracy (and the response to it) has been a largely destructive force. Many publishers have either dropped projects altogether in favor of releasing them on home consoles instead, or have expanded DRM to the extreme.</p>
<p>The most likely solution, with PC gaming at least, will be digital distribution models, such as the very popular Steam service by Valve Software. The user has a Steam account to which all of his or her purchases are tied. They are free to download the game as often as they want and on as many different machines as they want, as long as the user is signed in to his or her Steam account at the time they are playing the game. This does not reduce piracy to 0%, but it has proven to be far more effective than everything else in the PC gaming DRM arena.</p>
<p>This episode of DBS was great. For general feedback about DBS, I would personally like it if you could expand on subjects a tad more in the episodes, making longer segments, but then I suppose it wouldn&#8217;t really be &#8220;bits&#8221; anymore. Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/18/drm-is-failure-in-action/comment-page-1/#comment-1327</link>
		<dc:creator>DB Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=615#comment-1327</guid>
		<description>Sure, starlatk, here&#039;s an article with some detail:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;taxonomyId=17&amp;articleId=9004909&amp;intsrc=hm_topic&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Speakers at a Federal Trade Commssion event Wednesday argued that controversial DRM (digital rights management) technology may actually be good for consumers because it could give them more choices for downloading or buying copyrighted content, despite previous high-profile failures of such projects.&lt;/a&gt;

Selected quotes from the article:

&lt;i&gt;Before DRM, &quot;you could do what you want with it,&quot; he said. &quot;But is that a good thing?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

...and...

&lt;i&gt;But Andrew Moss, senior director of technical policy at Microsoft Corp., claimed that DRM will be important to consumers as more of them began to create their own digital content. DRM will allow them to control how their creations are used, he said.

&quot;What [DRM] is intended to do is give people choices,&quot; he said.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, starlatk, here&#8217;s an article with some detail:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&#038;taxonomyId=17&#038;articleId=9004909&#038;intsrc=hm_topic" rel="nofollow">Speakers at a Federal Trade Commssion event Wednesday argued that controversial DRM (digital rights management) technology may actually be good for consumers because it could give them more choices for downloading or buying copyrighted content, despite previous high-profile failures of such projects.</a></p>
<p>Selected quotes from the article:</p>
<p><i>Before DRM, &#8220;you could do what you want with it,&#8221; he said. &#8220;But is that a good thing?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>&#8230;and&#8230;</p>
<p><i>But Andrew Moss, senior director of technical policy at Microsoft Corp., claimed that DRM will be important to consumers as more of them began to create their own digital content. DRM will allow them to control how their creations are used, he said.</p>
<p>&#8220;What [DRM] is intended to do is give people choices,&#8221; he said.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starlatk</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/18/drm-is-failure-in-action/comment-page-1/#comment-1324</link>
		<dc:creator>starlatk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=615#comment-1324</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be interested in what the other side says... Are there any valid disagreements?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested in what the other side says&#8230; Are there any valid disagreements?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/18/drm-is-failure-in-action/comment-page-1/#comment-1313</link>
		<dc:creator>DB Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=615#comment-1313</guid>
		<description>...as is your comment. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;as is your comment. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheThomas</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/18/drm-is-failure-in-action/comment-page-1/#comment-1312</link>
		<dc:creator>TheThomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=615#comment-1312</guid>
		<description>Succinct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Succinct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

