<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why pick on religion? Why religion matters to the non-religious</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/</link>
	<description>Skepticism. Critical thinking. Podcast. Community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:46:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan-LynnGriggs Lamberth[ Carneades]</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-5229</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan-LynnGriggs Lamberth[ Carneades]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-5229</guid>
		<description>Moses did not exist as archaelogists and historians find no  large presence of Hebrews in Egypt and no detritus from them and no Exodus  when there ought to be hills of detritus . So, that Egyptologist errs.
Michael errs with his silly begged question of biblical contents as fundamentalists are so wont to do. Like Gleason L. Archer, he&#039;d use far-fetched rationalizations to show no contradictions. James Barr in &quot; Beyond Fundamentalism&quot; and Timothy Callahan in &#039; Secret Origins of the Bible&quot; attest to Archer&#039;s doing that.
Faith, the we just say so of credulity, begs the question of its subject [ Articulett on the begging]. Science, as Sydney Hook observes, is acquired knowledge, whilst faith begs the question of being knowledge.Reason moves mountains of ignorance whilst faith rests on the argument from ignorance. Google the presumption of rationalism,please.
Michael is equivocating  faith in the sense of the trust  that  scientists and we naturalists do indeed have in science and the reliability of our senses and so forth with [blind] faith in Him, using Paul the Sophist&#039;s definition. He use  sophistry in his  apologetics but not as a philosophical sophist.- Alister McGrath, Dawkins&#039;s nemesis, claims that Dawkins makes an idiosyncratic use of faith, but other theists belie that when they urge us to just have faith. Yes, Aquinas does indeed distinquish betwixt rational foundation for belief in Him such as his ifve failed arguments and faith for such as the Trinity, but in the end it is faith that conquers,because at heart theists find &quot; reasons&quot; for there  evidential arguments. Nicholas and Ryan, y&#039;all might adumbrate on this.
Mark,  indeed.  One of my purposes  in life is to expose the scam of the ages that is religion. We have the right and - the duty to educate others about this just as theists have the right to proseletyze their superstition.
I&#039;m a Huxleyan agnostic [ skeptic]. Then there is the soft agnosticism that finds no evidence one way or the other for Him, and the hard form of Herbert Spencer that claims no one can know the Unknowable- God. Agnosticism is epistemological whilst atheism is metaphysica,l and so one can be an agnostic theist or an agnostic atheism [ Then some take the latter as being, in effect, soft atheism.].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moses did not exist as archaelogists and historians find no  large presence of Hebrews in Egypt and no detritus from them and no Exodus  when there ought to be hills of detritus . So, that Egyptologist errs.<br />
Michael errs with his silly begged question of biblical contents as fundamentalists are so wont to do. Like Gleason L. Archer, he&#8217;d use far-fetched rationalizations to show no contradictions. James Barr in &#8221; Beyond Fundamentalism&#8221; and Timothy Callahan in &#8216; Secret Origins of the Bible&#8221; attest to Archer&#8217;s doing that.<br />
Faith, the we just say so of credulity, begs the question of its subject [ Articulett on the begging]. Science, as Sydney Hook observes, is acquired knowledge, whilst faith begs the question of being knowledge.Reason moves mountains of ignorance whilst faith rests on the argument from ignorance. Google the presumption of rationalism,please.<br />
Michael is equivocating  faith in the sense of the trust  that  scientists and we naturalists do indeed have in science and the reliability of our senses and so forth with [blind] faith in Him, using Paul the Sophist&#8217;s definition. He use  sophistry in his  apologetics but not as a philosophical sophist.- Alister McGrath, Dawkins&#8217;s nemesis, claims that Dawkins makes an idiosyncratic use of faith, but other theists belie that when they urge us to just have faith. Yes, Aquinas does indeed distinquish betwixt rational foundation for belief in Him such as his ifve failed arguments and faith for such as the Trinity, but in the end it is faith that conquers,because at heart theists find &#8221; reasons&#8221; for there  evidential arguments. Nicholas and Ryan, y&#8217;all might adumbrate on this.<br />
Mark,  indeed.  One of my purposes  in life is to expose the scam of the ages that is religion. We have the right and &#8211; the duty to educate others about this just as theists have the right to proseletyze their superstition.<br />
I&#8217;m a Huxleyan agnostic [ skeptic]. Then there is the soft agnosticism that finds no evidence one way or the other for Him, and the hard form of Herbert Spencer that claims no one can know the Unknowable- God. Agnosticism is epistemological whilst atheism is metaphysica,l and so one can be an agnostic theist or an agnostic atheism [ Then some take the latter as being, in effect, soft atheism.].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-4875</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-4875</guid>
		<description>@Gilgamesh - your response to my comment &quot;It’s fine for her to tell him about Christianity&quot;
Your Response: I don’t think it is ‘fine’ for someone other than the parents to tell a young child about a world view.  How is it ‘fine’ for a cleaning woman to propagandize a child about Christianity?  Is it a safe assumption, by the tone of your remark, that you are a Christian?  Would it be ‘OK’ to tell your young children about Islam, Atheism, Scientology, etc.?&quot;
Gilgamesh, I was not endorsing the proselytizing of one&#039;s child.  However, if the child had questions about religious faith(s), it&#039;s up to the parents to explain the family&#039;s values.  Giving an educated explanation about a faith, e.g. a history of Christianity, Islam, etc. is harmless, as long as the explanation is done in concordance with the parents.  I agree, however, that the general trend towards deception in order to inculcate is inexcusable.
I&#039;m actually a former Roman Catholic; basically I&#039;ve come to terms with the fact that faith and dogma no longer makes sense to me, and hasn&#039;t for awhile.  I&#039;m merely saying that non-believing parents have a special obligation to explain the big faiths and their beliefs, so as to insulate the children from being unwillingly indoctrinated.  Once explained, the child will no longer be as vulnerable to the deceptive practices of such as this nanny.  My apologies if I have repeated myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gilgamesh &#8211; your response to my comment &#8220;It’s fine for her to tell him about Christianity&#8221;<br />
Your Response: I don’t think it is ‘fine’ for someone other than the parents to tell a young child about a world view.  How is it ‘fine’ for a cleaning woman to propagandize a child about Christianity?  Is it a safe assumption, by the tone of your remark, that you are a Christian?  Would it be ‘OK’ to tell your young children about Islam, Atheism, Scientology, etc.?&#8221;<br />
Gilgamesh, I was not endorsing the proselytizing of one&#8217;s child.  However, if the child had questions about religious faith(s), it&#8217;s up to the parents to explain the family&#8217;s values.  Giving an educated explanation about a faith, e.g. a history of Christianity, Islam, etc. is harmless, as long as the explanation is done in concordance with the parents.  I agree, however, that the general trend towards deception in order to inculcate is inexcusable.<br />
I&#8217;m actually a former Roman Catholic; basically I&#8217;ve come to terms with the fact that faith and dogma no longer makes sense to me, and hasn&#8217;t for awhile.  I&#8217;m merely saying that non-believing parents have a special obligation to explain the big faiths and their beliefs, so as to insulate the children from being unwillingly indoctrinated.  Once explained, the child will no longer be as vulnerable to the deceptive practices of such as this nanny.  My apologies if I have repeated myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-4873</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-4873</guid>
		<description>Gilgamesh,
Brevity is a good thing.  Brevity, or what particular length that suggests in your mind, may not always be appropriate.  Some topics require more than soundbites.  No good topic is advanced by petty quips.
I&#039;ll be content if you at least read and considered what was discussed in the &quot;word salads.&quot;  How you choose to respond is your choice.
Michael </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gilgamesh,<br />
Brevity is a good thing.  Brevity, or what particular length that suggests in your mind, may not always be appropriate.  Some topics require more than soundbites.  No good topic is advanced by petty quips.<br />
I&#8217;ll be content if you at least read and considered what was discussed in the &#8221;word salads.&#8221;  How you choose to respond is your choice.<br />
Michael </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilgamesh</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-4869</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilgamesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-4869</guid>
		<description>@Warren (first commenter)  &quot;... It’s fine for her to tell him about Christianity,...&quot;
I don&#039;t think it is &#039;fine&#039; for someone other than the parents to tell a young child about a world view.  How is it &#039;fine&#039; for a cleaning woman to propagandize a child about Christianity?  Is it a safe assumption, by the tone of your remark,  that you are a Christian?  Would it be &#039;OK&#039; to tell your young children about Islam, Atheism, Scientology, etc.?
 
@ Howard &amp; Michael   -   A little brevity would go a long way, seriously, your posts sound more like word salads than reasoned theses.
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Warren (first commenter)  &#8220;&#8230; It’s fine for her to tell him about Christianity,&#8230;&#8221;<br />
I don&#8217;t think it is &#8216;fine&#8217; for someone other than the parents to tell a young child about a world view.  How is it &#8216;fine&#8217; for a cleaning woman to propagandize a child about Christianity?  Is it a safe assumption, by the tone of your remark,  that you are a Christian?  Would it be &#8216;OK&#8217; to tell your young children about Islam, Atheism, Scientology, etc.?<br />
 <br />
@ Howard &amp; Michael   -   A little brevity would go a long way, seriously, your posts sound more like word salads than reasoned theses.<br />
 <br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hilisgen</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-2983</link>
		<dc:creator>hilisgen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 15:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-2983</guid>
		<description>First of all... David

It’s such a sick thing that happened to your sun, I hope such thing would not happen again from anywhere, especially from the school.

Second of all, 

Hey Michael!!!

if you are going to fallow your life based on a fiction book which your parents or your teachers insisted on being true ... it’s your choice .. I have been educated the same way I just reached to a different conclusion, does that make me smarter than you … I hope not. my conclusion involved me to look at the EVIDENCE that there is nothing to support the existence of god other than a book that asks people to have faith ... I mean this is just about the same tactic someone would use on another while scamming them ... sad that its highly possible that you are one of those people who just can’t have a mind open enough to see through the bible.

We both have different reasons for trying to convince people, you might try to save them from the eternal fire that the book you referred to claimed to exist. The reason why I ask people to be skeptic is because if everybody would stop to question, there wouldn’t be science, or improvement. Because people simple wouldn’t need to, after all. They will go to heaven or whatever once they die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all&#8230; David</p>
<p>It’s such a sick thing that happened to your sun, I hope such thing would not happen again from anywhere, especially from the school.</p>
<p>Second of all, </p>
<p>Hey Michael!!!</p>
<p>if you are going to fallow your life based on a fiction book which your parents or your teachers insisted on being true &#8230; it’s your choice .. I have been educated the same way I just reached to a different conclusion, does that make me smarter than you … I hope not. my conclusion involved me to look at the EVIDENCE that there is nothing to support the existence of god other than a book that asks people to have faith &#8230; I mean this is just about the same tactic someone would use on another while scamming them &#8230; sad that its highly possible that you are one of those people who just can’t have a mind open enough to see through the bible.</p>
<p>We both have different reasons for trying to convince people, you might try to save them from the eternal fire that the book you referred to claimed to exist. The reason why I ask people to be skeptic is because if everybody would stop to question, there wouldn’t be science, or improvement. Because people simple wouldn’t need to, after all. They will go to heaven or whatever once they die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-2932</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-2932</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dbskeptic.com/articles/#rules&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;[comment deleted]&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dbskeptic.com/articles/#rules" rel="nofollow">[comment deleted]</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-2926</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-2926</guid>
		<description>The reason I, not try to disprove, but express my opinions on why god exist or not, is not because deep down I think there is a god.
I absolutely don&#039;t what so ever.
There are people out in the world who I care for more than myself.
One of them having a terrible life so far, has been through a LIVING hell and still is convinced there is a god.
I don&#039;t think it&#039;s right, this person has been good and honest all his/her life, nothing else.  Yet still has one of the worst lives I&#039;ve ever seen.
He/She still goes to church, for what reason? I don&#039;t know, but does and I feel bad for him/her.
I want that person to know how I feel and life isn&#039;t supposed to only be like that.
If there was a god then I wouldn&#039;t want any part of him. If he exist than what he has done to that person has cause me alot of pain, and even more to the person.
They deserve so much more but are treated with the worst.
I want that person to know I love him/her and hope one day you get what you deserve, which, is so much more than you have now...

-Mark A. Leukhardt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason I, not try to disprove, but express my opinions on why god exist or not, is not because deep down I think there is a god.<br />
I absolutely don&#8217;t what so ever.<br />
There are people out in the world who I care for more than myself.<br />
One of them having a terrible life so far, has been through a LIVING hell and still is convinced there is a god.<br />
I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s right, this person has been good and honest all his/her life, nothing else.  Yet still has one of the worst lives I&#8217;ve ever seen.<br />
He/She still goes to church, for what reason? I don&#8217;t know, but does and I feel bad for him/her.<br />
I want that person to know how I feel and life isn&#8217;t supposed to only be like that.<br />
If there was a god then I wouldn&#8217;t want any part of him. If he exist than what he has done to that person has cause me alot of pain, and even more to the person.<br />
They deserve so much more but are treated with the worst.<br />
I want that person to know I love him/her and hope one day you get what you deserve, which, is so much more than you have now&#8230;</p>
<p>-Mark A. Leukhardt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1541</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1541</guid>
		<description>Hello Nina,

The Bible says that of all God&#039;s creatures, only humans are made in His image.  In the Christian worldview, mankind&#039;s rebellion against God plunged him into sin.  The effects of sin account for all human suffering, be it psycholgical, social, spiritual, moral, and what have you.     

In answer to one of your questions, man cannot be all-knowing.  Only God is omniscient.  Although as finite creatures we cannot know all things, we can know what God has chosen to reveal to us. 

I believe that abortion grieves and angers God.  The life that is created is His handiwork.  God says:  &quot;Before I formed you in the womb I knew you. . .&quot; (Jeremiah 1:5).  I also believe that God is merciful and forgives our sins when we confess them and seek His forgiveness.  We must humble ourselves, acknowledge our sinfulness, and turn to Him in repentance.  &quot;And all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation&quot; (2 Corinthians 5:18).
 
God Bless,

Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Nina,</p>
<p>The Bible says that of all God&#8217;s creatures, only humans are made in His image.  In the Christian worldview, mankind&#8217;s rebellion against God plunged him into sin.  The effects of sin account for all human suffering, be it psycholgical, social, spiritual, moral, and what have you.     </p>
<p>In answer to one of your questions, man cannot be all-knowing.  Only God is omniscient.  Although as finite creatures we cannot know all things, we can know what God has chosen to reveal to us. </p>
<p>I believe that abortion grieves and angers God.  The life that is created is His handiwork.  God says:  &#8220;Before I formed you in the womb I knew you. . .&#8221; (Jeremiah 1:5).  I also believe that God is merciful and forgives our sins when we confess them and seek His forgiveness.  We must humble ourselves, acknowledge our sinfulness, and turn to Him in repentance.  &#8220;And all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation&#8221; (2 Corinthians 5:18).</p>
<p>God Bless,</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nina</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1540</link>
		<dc:creator>Nina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1540</guid>
		<description>Michael,
How come you didn&#039;t answer my questions?  I have some more questions for you, but if you won&#039;t bother to answer them, then I won&#039;t waste my energy asking them.
&lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;
Probability is meaningful when things are up to chance, or random.  &quot;A random process is a repeating process whose outcomes follow no describable deterministic pattern, but follow a probability distribution such that the relative probability of the occurrence of each outcome can be approximated or calculated&quot; (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomness).  Even when things aren&#039;t random, the probability of those things happening is 100%, and knowing this probability would be useful.  
&lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;
You said, &quot;Humans embrace such abstract things as love, justice, and beauty. How does the atheist account for these?&quot;
Learn about psychology (esp. evolutionary psychology), which helps explain why humans think what they do.  The way human brains work is similar to the way other animals brains work.  Do you believe your god made other animals similar to him?  There are inaccuracies in the way we perceive things, which goes against the view that someone made &quot;minds whose thoughts correspond to the things He has made.&quot;  How would you account for perceptional inaccuracies and abnormal psychology, such as in sociopaths (who don&#039;t embrace social justice) and in persons w/ autism (who often don&#039;t comprehend abstract concepts)?  Since you believe man was made in the image of an all-knowing deity, do you believe man can be all-knowing, despite evidence that our brains are not capable of knowing everything?
&lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;
Where do you stand on social-political issues (ex: civil same-sex marriage, abortion bans, environmental regulations, death penalty, war, etc.)?  What do you consider yourself (ex: liberal, conservative, progressive, communist, etc.)?  I ask b/c I&#039;d like to figure out what effect (if any) your religion has on your public policy views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,<br />
How come you didn&#8217;t answer my questions?  I have some more questions for you, but if you won&#8217;t bother to answer them, then I won&#8217;t waste my energy asking them.<br />
<b></b><br />
Probability is meaningful when things are up to chance, or random.  &#8220;A random process is a repeating process whose outcomes follow no describable deterministic pattern, but follow a probability distribution such that the relative probability of the occurrence of each outcome can be approximated or calculated&#8221; (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomness" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomness</a>).  Even when things aren&#8217;t random, the probability of those things happening is 100%, and knowing this probability would be useful.<br />
<b></b><br />
You said, &#8220;Humans embrace such abstract things as love, justice, and beauty. How does the atheist account for these?&#8221;<br />
Learn about psychology (esp. evolutionary psychology), which helps explain why humans think what they do.  The way human brains work is similar to the way other animals brains work.  Do you believe your god made other animals similar to him?  There are inaccuracies in the way we perceive things, which goes against the view that someone made &#8220;minds whose thoughts correspond to the things He has made.&#8221;  How would you account for perceptional inaccuracies and abnormal psychology, such as in sociopaths (who don&#8217;t embrace social justice) and in persons w/ autism (who often don&#8217;t comprehend abstract concepts)?  Since you believe man was made in the image of an all-knowing deity, do you believe man can be all-knowing, despite evidence that our brains are not capable of knowing everything?<br />
<b></b><br />
Where do you stand on social-political issues (ex: civil same-sex marriage, abortion bans, environmental regulations, death penalty, war, etc.)?  What do you consider yourself (ex: liberal, conservative, progressive, communist, etc.)?  I ask b/c I&#8217;d like to figure out what effect (if any) your religion has on your public policy views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1486</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1486</guid>
		<description>Andy,

There is no probability if we live in a chance universe; probability would be meaningless.  You certainly may choose to reject my worldview in favor of your own.  So be it.  That is your intellectual right.  What I am saying is that laws of logic, moral absolutes, love and other abstract immaterial realities pose no problem for the Christian.  His worldview can account for them.  The unbeliever&#039;s worldview cannot.  The unbeliever is borrowing capital from the Christian worldview when he or she accepts that there are abstract and universal laws of logic.

You want proof that God exists?  Look around you.  The universe proclaims the glory of God.  The Bible reveals the redemptive plan and work of Jesus Christ.  Humans embrace such abstract things as love, justice, and beauty.  How does the atheist account for these?  Christianity holds that God made man in His image and endowed him with moral consciousness and minds whose thoughts correspond to the things He has made.

You wrote the following:  &quot;We can have “faith” in probability and statistics. Yes, the sun will rise tomorrow. I have “faith” that it will because I know how the solar system works. And even if I didn’t, I’d have “faith” in a sunrise because it’s happened roughly twelve thousand times on a predictable basis since I was born. I have “faith” in gravity because gravity behaves according to known laws. If you want to call this “faith”, fine. But I argue it’s very different than religious “faith”, that is defined as belief without evidence.&quot;

The distinction you draw between your statistics-based faith and &quot;religious&quot; faith is artificial.  Your comments reflect that you assume the uniformity of nature, but outside of the Christian worldview it cannot reasonably be assumed.  It makes no difference that the sun has risen trillions of time before; that does not prove what will happen tomorrow.  It is circular reasoning to argue that the past instances of the sun rising prove it will rise tomorrow.  David Hume described precisely this problem.  It is no wonder that Hume&#039;s empiricism led him inexorably to skepticism. 

The Christian is not met with the futility of the problem of induction.  God sustains the universe according to laws He has established.  God&#039;s sovereign control of all things accounts for order and abstract universal laws of logic.  His control accounts for the uniformity of nature.  The Christian can rest assured that tomorrow will be like today because God has ordained that night and day and heat and cold will continue until the end.  Your worldview does not permit this confidence, for in it there is only contingency.  You may do an experiment in the laboratory today that ends safely; tomorrow, you may perform that very experiment again under the same conditions but produce an explosion.  How can you be certain that will not happen?  Your worldview requires faith that things will continue on just as they have, but in a chance universe you cannot be certain of anything.  All of science necessarily rests upon the Christian view of the universe!  

Faith is not belief without evidence, as you suggest.  You have already shown that faith is an inescapable part of human experience.  Faith is the precondition of all reasoning.

As to the life, death, and resurrection of my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, the Bible contains eyewitness accounts.  The historical accuracy of the Bible has been shown time and time again.  The unbeliever may not like this evidence, but it is evidence nevertheless.  The unbeliever&#039;s dismissal of it reflects where his presuppositional commitments lie.

Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy,</p>
<p>There is no probability if we live in a chance universe; probability would be meaningless.  You certainly may choose to reject my worldview in favor of your own.  So be it.  That is your intellectual right.  What I am saying is that laws of logic, moral absolutes, love and other abstract immaterial realities pose no problem for the Christian.  His worldview can account for them.  The unbeliever&#8217;s worldview cannot.  The unbeliever is borrowing capital from the Christian worldview when he or she accepts that there are abstract and universal laws of logic.</p>
<p>You want proof that God exists?  Look around you.  The universe proclaims the glory of God.  The Bible reveals the redemptive plan and work of Jesus Christ.  Humans embrace such abstract things as love, justice, and beauty.  How does the atheist account for these?  Christianity holds that God made man in His image and endowed him with moral consciousness and minds whose thoughts correspond to the things He has made.</p>
<p>You wrote the following:  &#8220;We can have “faith” in probability and statistics. Yes, the sun will rise tomorrow. I have “faith” that it will because I know how the solar system works. And even if I didn’t, I’d have “faith” in a sunrise because it’s happened roughly twelve thousand times on a predictable basis since I was born. I have “faith” in gravity because gravity behaves according to known laws. If you want to call this “faith”, fine. But I argue it’s very different than religious “faith”, that is defined as belief without evidence.&#8221;</p>
<p>The distinction you draw between your statistics-based faith and &#8220;religious&#8221; faith is artificial.  Your comments reflect that you assume the uniformity of nature, but outside of the Christian worldview it cannot reasonably be assumed.  It makes no difference that the sun has risen trillions of time before; that does not prove what will happen tomorrow.  It is circular reasoning to argue that the past instances of the sun rising prove it will rise tomorrow.  David Hume described precisely this problem.  It is no wonder that Hume&#8217;s empiricism led him inexorably to skepticism. </p>
<p>The Christian is not met with the futility of the problem of induction.  God sustains the universe according to laws He has established.  God&#8217;s sovereign control of all things accounts for order and abstract universal laws of logic.  His control accounts for the uniformity of nature.  The Christian can rest assured that tomorrow will be like today because God has ordained that night and day and heat and cold will continue until the end.  Your worldview does not permit this confidence, for in it there is only contingency.  You may do an experiment in the laboratory today that ends safely; tomorrow, you may perform that very experiment again under the same conditions but produce an explosion.  How can you be certain that will not happen?  Your worldview requires faith that things will continue on just as they have, but in a chance universe you cannot be certain of anything.  All of science necessarily rests upon the Christian view of the universe!  </p>
<p>Faith is not belief without evidence, as you suggest.  You have already shown that faith is an inescapable part of human experience.  Faith is the precondition of all reasoning.</p>
<p>As to the life, death, and resurrection of my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, the Bible contains eyewitness accounts.  The historical accuracy of the Bible has been shown time and time again.  The unbeliever may not like this evidence, but it is evidence nevertheless.  The unbeliever&#8217;s dismissal of it reflects where his presuppositional commitments lie.</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1484</link>
		<dc:creator>DB Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1484</guid>
		<description>Michael, 

You seem to be making the claim that because religion A is falsifiable, then religion B is the &quot;right one&quot;. Defaulting to Christianity because other religions &quot;get it wrong&quot; is inconsistent unless you can also address Christianity&#039;s inconsistencies and impossible claims.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Christianity alone proclaims the true message of salvation by grace through faith in the finished work of Jesus Christ.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s perfectly fine for you to say, but don&#039;t expect us to take you seriously unless you can put some proof behind that claim.

Finally, a response to what you said to J Fox:

&lt;i&gt;But when you say that there is “no supporting factual evidence for a single supernatural event or being available to [you] or anyone else,” you are expressing great faith. &lt;/i&gt;

I won&#039;t put words in J Fox&#039;s mouth, but here is my own interpretation: We can have &quot;faith&quot; in probability and statistics. Yes, the sun will rise tomorrow. I have &quot;faith&quot; that it will because I know how the solar system works. And even if I didn&#039;t, I&#039;d have &quot;faith&quot; in a sunrise because it&#039;s happened roughly twelve thousand times on a predictable basis since I was born. I have &quot;faith&quot; in gravity because gravity behaves according to known laws. If you want to call this &quot;faith&quot;, fine. But I argue it&#039;s very different than religious &quot;faith&quot;, that is defined as belief without evidence.

Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, </p>
<p>You seem to be making the claim that because religion A is falsifiable, then religion B is the &#8220;right one&#8221;. Defaulting to Christianity because other religions &#8220;get it wrong&#8221; is inconsistent unless you can also address Christianity&#8217;s inconsistencies and impossible claims.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Christianity alone proclaims the true message of salvation by grace through faith in the finished work of Jesus Christ.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s perfectly fine for you to say, but don&#8217;t expect us to take you seriously unless you can put some proof behind that claim.</p>
<p>Finally, a response to what you said to J Fox:</p>
<p><i>But when you say that there is “no supporting factual evidence for a single supernatural event or being available to [you] or anyone else,” you are expressing great faith. </i></p>
<p>I won&#8217;t put words in J Fox&#8217;s mouth, but here is my own interpretation: We can have &#8220;faith&#8221; in probability and statistics. Yes, the sun will rise tomorrow. I have &#8220;faith&#8221; that it will because I know how the solar system works. And even if I didn&#8217;t, I&#8217;d have &#8220;faith&#8221; in a sunrise because it&#8217;s happened roughly twelve thousand times on a predictable basis since I was born. I have &#8220;faith&#8221; in gravity because gravity behaves according to known laws. If you want to call this &#8220;faith&#8221;, fine. But I argue it&#8217;s very different than religious &#8220;faith&#8221;, that is defined as belief without evidence.</p>
<p>Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nina</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator>Nina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1482</guid>
		<description>Michael, the same has been said about the Bible: There are conflicts between Biblical stories.  The Bible is internally contradictory. There are glaring historical errors in the Bible.  http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/  http://www.amazon.com/Kens-Guide-Bible-Ken-Smith/dp/0922233179/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1235777757&amp;sr=1-1
&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;
Judaism has a messiah, who has yet to come to.  The Matrix has a messiah: Neo. My point is: &quot;When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.&quot; -Stephen F. Roberts
&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;
You seem to spent a lot of time being a salesman for Christianity.  Don&#039;t you think this world would be a better place if all the time, energy, and other resources ppl spent on pushing religion were put to better use?  Is it more important to you that individuals believe in Jesus than that individuals foster well-being?  If yes, then you&#039;d be fine w/ ppl believing in Jesus and causing more suffering, such as all the suffering alluded to the article&#039;s last paragraph?  Do you think it was good that the author&#039;s proselytizing Christian housekeeper made the author&#039;s son suffer keeping a secret?  If so, I&#039;m afraid your sense of morality has been hijacked by dogma.  (Either that or you&#039;re psychologically abnormal, like a sociopath, in which case, you should get therapy or imprisonment.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, the same has been said about the Bible: There are conflicts between Biblical stories.  The Bible is internally contradictory. There are glaring historical errors in the Bible.  <a href="http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/" rel="nofollow">http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/</a>  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0922233179/?tag=dbskeptic-20" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/dp/0922233179/?tag=dbskeptic-20</a><br />
<b> </b><br />
Judaism has a messiah, who has yet to come to.  The Matrix has a messiah: Neo. My point is: &#8220;When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.&#8221; -Stephen F. Roberts<br />
<b> </b><br />
You seem to spent a lot of time being a salesman for Christianity.  Don&#8217;t you think this world would be a better place if all the time, energy, and other resources ppl spent on pushing religion were put to better use?  Is it more important to you that individuals believe in Jesus than that individuals foster well-being?  If yes, then you&#8217;d be fine w/ ppl believing in Jesus and causing more suffering, such as all the suffering alluded to the article&#8217;s last paragraph?  Do you think it was good that the author&#8217;s proselytizing Christian housekeeper made the author&#8217;s son suffer keeping a secret?  If so, I&#8217;m afraid your sense of morality has been hijacked by dogma.  (Either that or you&#8217;re psychologically abnormal, like a sociopath, in which case, you should get therapy or imprisonment.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1480</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1480</guid>
		<description>Nina,

Thank you for your reply.  The Koran claims to be the inscription of an eternal book in heaven, but later portions of the Koran &quot;abrogate&quot; earlier ones.  My understanding has been that Muslims hold that later revelations from God must conform with previous revelations; and the Koran claims to be continuous with the Bible and a confirmation of it. Yet there are contradictions between the two books (for instance, regarding Christ&#039;s deity, His dying on the cross, etc.).  There are also many conflicts between Biblical stories and the Koranic versions of them. 

There are glaring historical errors in the Koran (for instance, the mother of Jesus is called the sister of Aaron: &quot;Mary&quot; becomes &quot;Miriam&quot;). Further, the Koran is internally contradictory (for instance, all of Noah&#039;s family is said to be saved through the flood, but one of Noah&#039;s sons is elsewhere said to have drowned in the flood).

The late Dr. Bahnsen pointed out that the Islamic doctrine of &quot;tanzih&quot; (or transcendence) - which says that no human language can positively describe Allah because he is allegedly &quot;incomparable&quot; (Surah 42:11) - renders logically impossible the Koran&#039;s claim that it is a positive revelation and description of Allah.

Dr. Bahnsen said the following:  &quot;Neither Judaism nor Islam have an anointed one or Messiah who fulfills the anticipation of the Old Testament scriptures, even though they acknowledge them to be God&#039;s inspired self-revelation. For this reason the theologies of Judaism and Islam lack material adequacy: they do not do justice to the message of God&#039;s revealed word. That is why we look upon them as heretical versions of the Biblical faith, versions which do not deliver good news to mankind.&quot;

Christianity alone proclaims the true message of salvation by grace through faith in the finished work of Jesus Christ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nina,</p>
<p>Thank you for your reply.  The Koran claims to be the inscription of an eternal book in heaven, but later portions of the Koran &#8220;abrogate&#8221; earlier ones.  My understanding has been that Muslims hold that later revelations from God must conform with previous revelations; and the Koran claims to be continuous with the Bible and a confirmation of it. Yet there are contradictions between the two books (for instance, regarding Christ&#8217;s deity, His dying on the cross, etc.).  There are also many conflicts between Biblical stories and the Koranic versions of them. </p>
<p>There are glaring historical errors in the Koran (for instance, the mother of Jesus is called the sister of Aaron: &#8220;Mary&#8221; becomes &#8220;Miriam&#8221;). Further, the Koran is internally contradictory (for instance, all of Noah&#8217;s family is said to be saved through the flood, but one of Noah&#8217;s sons is elsewhere said to have drowned in the flood).</p>
<p>The late Dr. Bahnsen pointed out that the Islamic doctrine of &#8220;tanzih&#8221; (or transcendence) &#8211; which says that no human language can positively describe Allah because he is allegedly &#8220;incomparable&#8221; (Surah 42:11) &#8211; renders logically impossible the Koran&#8217;s claim that it is a positive revelation and description of Allah.</p>
<p>Dr. Bahnsen said the following:  &#8220;Neither Judaism nor Islam have an anointed one or Messiah who fulfills the anticipation of the Old Testament scriptures, even though they acknowledge them to be God&#8217;s inspired self-revelation. For this reason the theologies of Judaism and Islam lack material adequacy: they do not do justice to the message of God&#8217;s revealed word. That is why we look upon them as heretical versions of the Biblical faith, versions which do not deliver good news to mankind.&#8221;</p>
<p>Christianity alone proclaims the true message of salvation by grace through faith in the finished work of Jesus Christ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nina</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1478</link>
		<dc:creator>Nina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1478</guid>
		<description>Michael, please re-read everything you&#039;ve written here, but replace:
&quot;Bible&quot; or &quot;Scriptures&quot; with &quot;Quran,&quot; 
&quot;God&quot; or &quot;He&quot; with &quot;Allah,&quot; and 
&quot;Jesus&quot; with &quot;Muhammad (peace be upon him).&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, please re-read everything you&#8217;ve written here, but replace:<br />
&#8220;Bible&#8221; or &#8220;Scriptures&#8221; with &#8220;Quran,&#8221;<br />
&#8220;God&#8221; or &#8220;He&#8221; with &#8220;Allah,&#8221; and<br />
&#8220;Jesus&#8221; with &#8220;Muhammad (peace be upon him).&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1458</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1458</guid>
		<description>J Fox -

I am sorry that your faith has faded.  But when you say that there is &quot;no supporting factual evidence for a single supernatural event or being available to [you] or anyone else,&quot; you are expressing great faith.  Have you experienced everything?  Have you experienced the sum total of every human experience from the beginning of human history to the present?  You are dismissing the evidence of the Bible.  You are dismissing natural revelation -- all of creation.  Are the eyewitness accounts in the Bible not evidence?  Were you there to confirm or disaffirm the reports of miracles?  If we all observed such miracles as the Bible mentions, wouldn&#039;t they no longer merit being called miracles?  God is sovereign.  Is anything too hard for Him?  &quot;With man it is impossible, but with God all things are possible.&quot;

We live in the world God has made.  All of creation testifies of the one true God.  Jesus was the light that came into the world.  Until we are regenerated, we hate the light.  &quot;No one comes to the Son unless the Father draws him.&quot;  

Friend, I pray you would not be deceived.  &quot;For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables&quot; (2 Timothy 4:3-4).  I pray your faith would come to rest in the person of Jesus Christ.  

God Bless,

Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J Fox -</p>
<p>I am sorry that your faith has faded.  But when you say that there is &#8220;no supporting factual evidence for a single supernatural event or being available to [you] or anyone else,&#8221; you are expressing great faith.  Have you experienced everything?  Have you experienced the sum total of every human experience from the beginning of human history to the present?  You are dismissing the evidence of the Bible.  You are dismissing natural revelation &#8212; all of creation.  Are the eyewitness accounts in the Bible not evidence?  Were you there to confirm or disaffirm the reports of miracles?  If we all observed such miracles as the Bible mentions, wouldn&#8217;t they no longer merit being called miracles?  God is sovereign.  Is anything too hard for Him?  &#8220;With man it is impossible, but with God all things are possible.&#8221;</p>
<p>We live in the world God has made.  All of creation testifies of the one true God.  Jesus was the light that came into the world.  Until we are regenerated, we hate the light.  &#8220;No one comes to the Son unless the Father draws him.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Friend, I pray you would not be deceived.  &#8220;For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables&#8221; (2 Timothy 4:3-4).  I pray your faith would come to rest in the person of Jesus Christ.  </p>
<p>God Bless,</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1454</link>
		<dc:creator>J Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1454</guid>
		<description>I was a believing conservative orthodox Christian for twenty five years. In the end when I started to separate the psychological, belief and social aspects of my “faith” I realized that there was absolutely no supporting factual evidence for a single supernatural event or being available to me or anyone else. My faith and belief faded rather quickly after holding it up to some rational scrutiny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a believing conservative orthodox Christian for twenty five years. In the end when I started to separate the psychological, belief and social aspects of my “faith” I realized that there was absolutely no supporting factual evidence for a single supernatural event or being available to me or anyone else. My faith and belief faded rather quickly after holding it up to some rational scrutiny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1413</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1413</guid>
		<description>Rycharde:

Maybe you can help Christians like me understand why their belief is &quot;deluded truth.&quot;

&quot;The problem is with belief itself: belief as a psychological state. It is actually very similar to being in love, except at least with human love there is a real object even if one may still be deluded about their qualities.&quot; 


If one is deluded about the qualities of his love&#039;s &quot;real object,&quot; how can he know that he is deluded about the qualities of his love&#039;s &quot;real object?&quot;

Why does a person love his child but not, say, a stone?

What distinguishes the child from the stone?

Please explain, in terms only of matter, time, and chance, why we should grieve the death of a human being?

What is love?



&quot;This is Sam Harris’s argument and his stance that we should not be tolerant of believers.&quot;


In a pure chance universe, can anyone control what he or she believes?  

If we can control what we believe in a pure chance universe, how is this possible?

How can there be free will if we are products of random events in a chance universe?


&quot;I write on news about research on beliefs and we are entering a phase where one has to be very careful even about the science as it is being filled with Christians - my review of the New Scientist story Born Believers is a perfect example.&quot;

Doesn&#039;t science require uniformity in nature?

How can there be uniformity in a random chance universe?  

How do you know tomorrow will be like today?  


&quot;I have no respect for believers.&quot;

Is this the strength of your argument? 

 
You refer to &quot;deluded truth.&quot;  Please tell me what the truth is.  On what authority do your assertions about reality rest?

Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rycharde:</p>
<p>Maybe you can help Christians like me understand why their belief is &#8220;deluded truth.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The problem is with belief itself: belief as a psychological state. It is actually very similar to being in love, except at least with human love there is a real object even if one may still be deluded about their qualities.&#8221; </p>
<p>If one is deluded about the qualities of his love&#8217;s &#8220;real object,&#8221; how can he know that he is deluded about the qualities of his love&#8217;s &#8220;real object?&#8221;</p>
<p>Why does a person love his child but not, say, a stone?</p>
<p>What distinguishes the child from the stone?</p>
<p>Please explain, in terms only of matter, time, and chance, why we should grieve the death of a human being?</p>
<p>What is love?</p>
<p>&#8220;This is Sam Harris’s argument and his stance that we should not be tolerant of believers.&#8221;</p>
<p>In a pure chance universe, can anyone control what he or she believes?  </p>
<p>If we can control what we believe in a pure chance universe, how is this possible?</p>
<p>How can there be free will if we are products of random events in a chance universe?</p>
<p>&#8220;I write on news about research on beliefs and we are entering a phase where one has to be very careful even about the science as it is being filled with Christians &#8211; my review of the New Scientist story Born Believers is a perfect example.&#8221;</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t science require uniformity in nature?</p>
<p>How can there be uniformity in a random chance universe?  </p>
<p>How do you know tomorrow will be like today?  </p>
<p>&#8220;I have no respect for believers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is this the strength of your argument? </p>
<p>You refer to &#8220;deluded truth.&#8221;  Please tell me what the truth is.  On what authority do your assertions about reality rest?</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rycharde Manne</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator>Rycharde Manne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1395</guid>
		<description>Two things. Firstly, I have stopped arguing on logical grounds. I think that is a red herring. The problem is with belief itself: belief as a psychological state. It is actually very similar to being in love, except at least with human love there is a real object even if one may still be deluded about their qualities. Your story shows the real dangers of this, in that they are told to evangelize their deluded truth. This is Sam Harris&#039;s argument and his stance that we should not be tolerant of believers. I write on news about research on beliefs and we are entering a phase where one has to be very careful even about the science as it is being filled with Christians - my review of the New Scientist story Born Believers is a perfect example.

I have no respect for believers. One of things I write about in one of my blogs are reviews and comments on the Vatican&#039;s daily newspaper, as it is only published in Italian. I do have to wear protection when I read it. But what moderate, rational humans don&#039;t really see is that this is a war. The Catholic Church was founded as the ghost of the Roman Empire and their expressed aim is universal catholicism - this virus will not stop on its own. Pope Leo stated that it is a spiritual empire - an empire, with generals and troops. One cannot fight a war with mere philosophers - look at what happened to the Greek academies, shut down for good in the name of one state and one religion.

What with public talk of the New World Order finally exposing itself outside conspiracy sites and the propaganda from religions, the days of being free thinkers are going to be numbered. More and more controls are being implemented. We still have the internet :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things. Firstly, I have stopped arguing on logical grounds. I think that is a red herring. The problem is with belief itself: belief as a psychological state. It is actually very similar to being in love, except at least with human love there is a real object even if one may still be deluded about their qualities. Your story shows the real dangers of this, in that they are told to evangelize their deluded truth. This is Sam Harris&#8217;s argument and his stance that we should not be tolerant of believers. I write on news about research on beliefs and we are entering a phase where one has to be very careful even about the science as it is being filled with Christians &#8211; my review of the New Scientist story Born Believers is a perfect example.</p>
<p>I have no respect for believers. One of things I write about in one of my blogs are reviews and comments on the Vatican&#8217;s daily newspaper, as it is only published in Italian. I do have to wear protection when I read it. But what moderate, rational humans don&#8217;t really see is that this is a war. The Catholic Church was founded as the ghost of the Roman Empire and their expressed aim is universal catholicism &#8211; this virus will not stop on its own. Pope Leo stated that it is a spiritual empire &#8211; an empire, with generals and troops. One cannot fight a war with mere philosophers &#8211; look at what happened to the Greek academies, shut down for good in the name of one state and one religion.</p>
<p>What with public talk of the New World Order finally exposing itself outside conspiracy sites and the propaganda from religions, the days of being free thinkers are going to be numbered. More and more controls are being implemented. We still have the internet :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1389</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1389</guid>
		<description>Howard,

I appreciate the time you took to reply.  My goal is not to incite acrimony, so I will not belabor our very fundamental differences.

I could respond to your challenges to the Biblical accounts.  I could tell you that it is not the case that Noah took only two of each kind of creature on the vessel.  I could point out that major fossil fields containing millions of fossils lie on every continent, evidencing a global catastrophe.  I could tell you that flood accounts in other ancient writings are unsurprising in light of the Biblical account.  I do not fear the evidence; apart from God, there are no such things as facts.

Friend, the Bible does speak of miracles.  You rightly suggest that we do not see these sorts of things in our everyday lives.  Which is to say, they are miracles.  

We all have assumptions about reality.  One of your assumptions is that miracles are impossible.  So you reject the Scriptures on account of an a priori metaphysical bias.  That is, you assume the Bible cannot be true because it contains miracles.  You have an intellectual right to think the way you do; but logically speaking, that line of reasoning is flawed.          

Howard, I wish you well.

Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard,</p>
<p>I appreciate the time you took to reply.  My goal is not to incite acrimony, so I will not belabor our very fundamental differences.</p>
<p>I could respond to your challenges to the Biblical accounts.  I could tell you that it is not the case that Noah took only two of each kind of creature on the vessel.  I could point out that major fossil fields containing millions of fossils lie on every continent, evidencing a global catastrophe.  I could tell you that flood accounts in other ancient writings are unsurprising in light of the Biblical account.  I do not fear the evidence; apart from God, there are no such things as facts.</p>
<p>Friend, the Bible does speak of miracles.  You rightly suggest that we do not see these sorts of things in our everyday lives.  Which is to say, they are miracles.  </p>
<p>We all have assumptions about reality.  One of your assumptions is that miracles are impossible.  So you reject the Scriptures on account of an a priori metaphysical bias.  That is, you assume the Bible cannot be true because it contains miracles.  You have an intellectual right to think the way you do; but logically speaking, that line of reasoning is flawed.          </p>
<p>Howard, I wish you well.</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1387</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1387</guid>
		<description>Hey Michael, see ya back at it

Michael wrote - What are the fables you claim the Scriptures contain?

FABLES SECTION:  at least by my findings or what I choose to say is truth therefor I shall adopt it as my belief as factual information!

I said scripture meaning all I&#039;ve studied, you choose to fill in the blank for I have study from both bible and Quran since both books were required study material in the nation of islam.  Michael wrote - &quot;You call the Scriptures (the Holy Bible) “fables.” How do you know this? How can agnosticism permit such a confident claim about the nature of the Scriptures, or anything for that matter?&quot; There is a saying when speaking in general and someone takes it  personally, &quot;throw a rock in a pack of dogs and the only one that holler is the one you hit&quot;. 

Noah&#039;s Ark
&quot;This is basically a reworking of the much older &quot;Epic of Gilgamesh&quot;. The idea that there was a worldwide flood is completely unsupported by any kind of evidence. After building the ark, Yahweh [God, Jesus] gave Noah 7 days warning of the flood. There are somewhere between 8 million and 10 million species inhabiting the earth (not including the 30 million different types of insect). Since there was a male and a female of each species on the ark, Noah had just one week to collect polar bears from the North Pole, lions from Africa, spiders from South America and tigers from India and the Far East. Even assuming he could travel around the world at the speed of light, there would have to be an average of 30 animals per second going through the ark&#039;s single door. How did the cone beetle survive the year at sea, bearing in mind it can only survive on a particular type of tree only found in California?&quot;   http://www.geocities.com/fuzzyquark/bible_fables.html

Kemetic / Egyptian Origin of Christianity
&quot;The author and scholar Gerald Massey, once a Christian Priest, who began investigating the questions that Christianity&#039;s origins posed for him found the trail leading to the civilization of Kemet / Egypt. As a consequence Massey became a student and investigator of Ancient Kemet / Egypt, subsequently revealed his findings in four major publications - Books of the Beginnings, (2 vols.), The Natural Genesis (2 vols.), Ancient Egypt the Light of the World (2 vols.) and The Lectures (1 vol.)&quot;.

&quot;Massey over the course of twenty or so years presented facts proving Christianity was fabricated upon what was stolen from Kemet / Egypt; and that Christianity was in no respect original or from any god. The following excerpt from the appendix of Ancient Egypt the Light of the World is of the comparative list Massey compiled demonstrating that Christianity is a plagiarized fabrication from its Kemetic / Egyptian origins&quot;.       http://www.kemetway.com/massey1.html

There is a book titled, &quot;The World&#039;s Sixteen Crucified Saviors&quot;, whole book online http://www.infidels.org/library/historical/kersey_graves/16/ , this story existed 15 times before jesus, same story retired actors!

Moses
&quot;There are many mysteries concerning the historical life of Moses.  Most of the important questions, concerning the extent of his education in Egypt and his reasons for leaving, have yet to be satisfactorily answered.  Moses is credited with giving the Hebrews 10 Commandments, but close examination of their content reveals they were derived from the 42 Admonitions of Maat [negative Confessions], which Moses was exposed to while living in Egypt.  There is a growing body of evidence among archaeologists and Old Testament scholars which has lead many to conclude that the exodus was a mythical event, recorded in allegorical form.&quot; page 92   [Browder, A. T. (1992).  Nile Valley Contributions to Civilization.  Washington D.C:  The Institute of Karmic Guidance]

I have experience of being a follower of two religions in my past.  Here is how early Greek &amp; Roman homosexual [men for fun and women for reproduction] culture infect the belief to come about later during the Roman empire existence called christianity.  Egypt rule was passed through the woman monarchy, later to be fabricated by patriarchy culture so the woman&#039;s divinity ability ended.  Even in the PBS special on Islam title &quot;The Empire of Faith&quot;, said &quot;the woman was able to vote 1,200 years before he woman in the west&quot;, of course all this changed once the Mongolians came from the east and slaughtered christians, muslims &amp; jews, the changing period in the Islam for they accepted Islam later and their culture brought caused change.  Baghdad, Iraq and Cordoba, Spain were the centers of learning for men, women &amp; children while in its enlighten form which lasted for generations after muhammad.  

Misogyny 
Man&#039;s inability to procreate without the aid of a woman giving the man the connection and power the woman has with the child, contributed to the misogynistic concept.  These phrases I believe to be true but not absolute there is always a percentage of those that do and those that don&#039;t but for the higher percentile I think, &quot;the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world&quot;, &quot;a nation can rise no higher than its woman&quot; and &quot;when you teach a woman you teach a nation, when you teach a man you teach an individual&quot;.  The monthly communion in the church is an extension of the misogynistic concept, to create a male savior whom blood was shed to bring about salvation for the entire planet.  This is in contrast to the woman&#039;s menstrual cycle&#039;s purpose, the cleansing for the fertility period to begin.  The savior male image have some hidden symbolic female attributes.

Later Christian writers extended the misogynistic themes in the Bible with a vengeance. Tertullian, one of the early church fathers, wrote:

&quot;In pain shall you bring forth children, woman, and you shall turn to your husband and he shall rule over you. And do you not know that you are Eve? God’s sentence hangs still over all your sex and His punishment weighs down upon you. You are the devil’s gateway; you are she who first violated the forbidden tree and broke the law of God. It was you who coaxed your way around him whom the devil had not the force to attack. With what ease you shattered that image of God: Man! Because of the death you merited, even the Son of God had to die. . . . Woman, you are the gate to hell.&quot;   http://www.seesharppress.com/20reasons.html#numberfifteen

HOLY TRINITY
The Holy Trinity of Egypt consisted of what we call today a nuclear family, father, mother &amp; child, [Kemetic names - Ausar, Aset &amp; Heru = Later came, Greek names - Osiris, Isis &amp; Horus] which would seem easier to comprehend and follow do to its composition.  Misogyny, inspired the fathers of the church to destroy that female image in divinity.   You stated, &quot;the christian world view is superior&quot;, as though christianity has originated all information EVER presented.  Even Einstein&#039;s equations seem to be a christian property if I&#039;m comprehending correctly.  Michael wrote, &quot;The Christian can account for such things: They reflect the all-knowing mind of God; mankind has been made in God’s image; and we live in the world God has made, with its natural laws and principles, possessing minds that can perceive, think, and reason. How does your worldview account for such things as abstract laws and the laws of logic?&quot;.   All christians have this all-knowing mind of god?  You all interface with Bluetooth technology or something, if that is the case why you all stopped interfacing with Bush, pretty messed-up situation we in economically speaking?   Star-Trek, Cyborg sect! 

GENERAL SECTION
AGNOSTICISM
Definition of Agnosticism which I choose to say is truth therefor I shall adopt it as my belief as factual information!   Thomas Henry Huxley, stated, &quot;That it is wrong for a man to say he is certain of the objective truth of a proposition unless he can provide evidence which logically justifies that certainty. This is what agnosticism asserts and in my opinion, is all that is essential to agnosticism. [&quot;Christianity and Agnosticism,&quot; 1889]  http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/sn-huxley.html

SEASONS
Yes, god gets the credit for all that which man is lacking knowledge to or just choose to believe such as Michael&#039;s statement, &quot;He sustains me. He sustains the universe. The sun rises and sets by His decree. Winter changes to spring, spring to summer, summer to fall; since the creation of the world the seasons have changed this way. God has assured believers that the seasons will change this way until the end&quot;.   I can not say it is so.  I was once a god-knower such as yourself and I know plenty of philosophies of the intellectual design argument, philosophy can state a principle worthy practice, state a fact of existence  or enforce an unprovable point.  Here is a good one, you can have it , &quot;the universe is by intellectual design, creation through chaos &amp; randomness is about as logical as a printing company exploding and in the remains you find a dictionary as part of the result of the explosion&quot;.  

If you are a studious studier you can come up with plenty wisdom that will guide generations to come, but can not the bible or Quran be a series of wisdom notes of individuals throughout history?  I know of bible codes and the mathematical miracle of the Quran still I see no intervention in human affairs so I choose to exist within an efficiency setting, &quot;if it does not justifies my practice with some type of benefit then it will be cut from the to do list&quot;.  Every human being on this earth is trying to do one thing &quot;achieve the desired result in all aspects of life they can, as much as they can&quot;.  No body is doing anything for no reason, people tithe and pray hoping that god will improve their condition of life and die without enough money to bury themselves. If they knew no results was coming would they continue, I know of miracles of the human will and that is what I see it as human triumph. 

Michael wrote - &quot;The Christian can account for such things: They reflect the all-knowing mind of God; mankind has been made in God’s image; and we live in the world God has made, with its natural laws and principles, possessing minds that can perceive, think, and reason&quot;.  With this type thinking all other ideology is inferior and those that embrace them are inferior this is why the pope acted out an apologize for slavery, all religions have this mentality [competition brings this about, institutional survival] as I stated in my first insert in DBS, this is the reason the Gaza strip is a battle front now or is it for the stolen land, stolen cause it suppose to be holy land, yep religion is at the root...at least by my perception. 

ORIGIN
Before there was written language man communicated with art and the things man drew on mostly are the things which psychologist say will occupies man&#039;s mental though process mostly throughout his individual tenure on earth, animals he ate and the female or food and sex.  Our knowledge evolved to being able to master our environment, agriculture, now we are Sun worshipers cause we know our harvest which is our way of sustaining our life at the time, Sun is the source of our survival.  Sun travels in 12 constellations, [12 zodiac signs] hence 12 disciples, winter solstice 12/22,23,24 shortest days of the year 25th day gets longer [death &amp; resurection] and pagan celebrations that predates christmas were done.  Christmas was not brought to this country on Plymouth Rock, during the 13 colonies in states like Massachusetts there were laws that stated, &quot; you will be fined if seen celebrating on this date, your business will be fined if closed on 12/25&quot;, seen as a pagan &amp; forbiden practice.&quot; 

PERCEPTION
Michael wrote - &quot;Therefore, if there be any true, objective knowledge, all perceptions cannot be correct&quot;.  Prove with evidence on logical and scientific grounds you are correct with these fairy-tales or is this your belief you choose to believe in.  Do I just have to believe to perceive this is true?  

#1- &quot;He has saved me. He sustains me. He sustains the universe. The sun rises and sets by His decree. Winter changes to spring, spring to summer, summer to fall; since the creation of the world the seasons have changed this way. God has assured believers that the seasons will change this way until the end&quot;.
#2 - &quot;God has revealed Himself to us in the person of Jesus Christ, who was with God in the beginning and was God, who died for our sin and is the righteousness of all those who accept Him as Lord and Savior&quot;.  

Yep, I was with my father in the beginning to, in his testicles so I guess I was my father to, that makes sense!

In the perception of god-knowers there is no middle spectrum there is only belief or atheist.  

Michael I truly dig exchanging with you and you are not wrong for doing you and there is an argument for plenty of things and this can go on, and on, and on, and on, and on.  I&#039;m done, until next time I get inspired to write on something.  Agnosticism, is a new concept for me so it is like a new toy that I will one day get use to and just live it no need to debate or express it, I&#039;m just building.  More [5] of my articles are at Helium.com, search with Howard Fitz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Michael, see ya back at it</p>
<p>Michael wrote &#8211; What are the fables you claim the Scriptures contain?</p>
<p>FABLES SECTION:  at least by my findings or what I choose to say is truth therefor I shall adopt it as my belief as factual information!</p>
<p>I said scripture meaning all I&#8217;ve studied, you choose to fill in the blank for I have study from both bible and Quran since both books were required study material in the nation of islam.  Michael wrote &#8211; &#8220;You call the Scriptures (the Holy Bible) “fables.” How do you know this? How can agnosticism permit such a confident claim about the nature of the Scriptures, or anything for that matter?&#8221; There is a saying when speaking in general and someone takes it  personally, &#8220;throw a rock in a pack of dogs and the only one that holler is the one you hit&#8221;. </p>
<p>Noah&#8217;s Ark<br />
&#8220;This is basically a reworking of the much older &#8220;Epic of Gilgamesh&#8221;. The idea that there was a worldwide flood is completely unsupported by any kind of evidence. After building the ark, Yahweh [God, Jesus] gave Noah 7 days warning of the flood. There are somewhere between 8 million and 10 million species inhabiting the earth (not including the 30 million different types of insect). Since there was a male and a female of each species on the ark, Noah had just one week to collect polar bears from the North Pole, lions from Africa, spiders from South America and tigers from India and the Far East. Even assuming he could travel around the world at the speed of light, there would have to be an average of 30 animals per second going through the ark&#8217;s single door. How did the cone beetle survive the year at sea, bearing in mind it can only survive on a particular type of tree only found in California?&#8221;   <a href="http://www.geocities.com/fuzzyquark/bible_fables.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.geocities.com/fuzzyquark/bible_fables.html</a></p>
<p>Kemetic / Egyptian Origin of Christianity<br />
&#8220;The author and scholar Gerald Massey, once a Christian Priest, who began investigating the questions that Christianity&#8217;s origins posed for him found the trail leading to the civilization of Kemet / Egypt. As a consequence Massey became a student and investigator of Ancient Kemet / Egypt, subsequently revealed his findings in four major publications &#8211; Books of the Beginnings, (2 vols.), The Natural Genesis (2 vols.), Ancient Egypt the Light of the World (2 vols.) and The Lectures (1 vol.)&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Massey over the course of twenty or so years presented facts proving Christianity was fabricated upon what was stolen from Kemet / Egypt; and that Christianity was in no respect original or from any god. The following excerpt from the appendix of Ancient Egypt the Light of the World is of the comparative list Massey compiled demonstrating that Christianity is a plagiarized fabrication from its Kemetic / Egyptian origins&#8221;.       <a href="http://www.kemetway.com/massey1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.kemetway.com/massey1.html</a></p>
<p>There is a book titled, &#8220;The World&#8217;s Sixteen Crucified Saviors&#8221;, whole book online <a href="http://www.infidels.org/library/historical/kersey_graves/16/" rel="nofollow">http://www.infidels.org/library/historical/kersey_graves/16/</a> , this story existed 15 times before jesus, same story retired actors!</p>
<p>Moses<br />
&#8220;There are many mysteries concerning the historical life of Moses.  Most of the important questions, concerning the extent of his education in Egypt and his reasons for leaving, have yet to be satisfactorily answered.  Moses is credited with giving the Hebrews 10 Commandments, but close examination of their content reveals they were derived from the 42 Admonitions of Maat [negative Confessions], which Moses was exposed to while living in Egypt.  There is a growing body of evidence among archaeologists and Old Testament scholars which has lead many to conclude that the exodus was a mythical event, recorded in allegorical form.&#8221; page 92   [Browder, A. T. (1992).  Nile Valley Contributions to Civilization.  Washington D.C:  The Institute of Karmic Guidance]</p>
<p>I have experience of being a follower of two religions in my past.  Here is how early Greek &amp; Roman homosexual [men for fun and women for reproduction] culture infect the belief to come about later during the Roman empire existence called christianity.  Egypt rule was passed through the woman monarchy, later to be fabricated by patriarchy culture so the woman&#8217;s divinity ability ended.  Even in the PBS special on Islam title &#8220;The Empire of Faith&#8221;, said &#8220;the woman was able to vote 1,200 years before he woman in the west&#8221;, of course all this changed once the Mongolians came from the east and slaughtered christians, muslims &amp; jews, the changing period in the Islam for they accepted Islam later and their culture brought caused change.  Baghdad, Iraq and Cordoba, Spain were the centers of learning for men, women &amp; children while in its enlighten form which lasted for generations after muhammad.  </p>
<p>Misogyny<br />
Man&#8217;s inability to procreate without the aid of a woman giving the man the connection and power the woman has with the child, contributed to the misogynistic concept.  These phrases I believe to be true but not absolute there is always a percentage of those that do and those that don&#8217;t but for the higher percentile I think, &#8220;the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world&#8221;, &#8220;a nation can rise no higher than its woman&#8221; and &#8220;when you teach a woman you teach a nation, when you teach a man you teach an individual&#8221;.  The monthly communion in the church is an extension of the misogynistic concept, to create a male savior whom blood was shed to bring about salvation for the entire planet.  This is in contrast to the woman&#8217;s menstrual cycle&#8217;s purpose, the cleansing for the fertility period to begin.  The savior male image have some hidden symbolic female attributes.</p>
<p>Later Christian writers extended the misogynistic themes in the Bible with a vengeance. Tertullian, one of the early church fathers, wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;In pain shall you bring forth children, woman, and you shall turn to your husband and he shall rule over you. And do you not know that you are Eve? God’s sentence hangs still over all your sex and His punishment weighs down upon you. You are the devil’s gateway; you are she who first violated the forbidden tree and broke the law of God. It was you who coaxed your way around him whom the devil had not the force to attack. With what ease you shattered that image of God: Man! Because of the death you merited, even the Son of God had to die. . . . Woman, you are the gate to hell.&#8221;   <a href="http://www.seesharppress.com/20reasons.html#numberfifteen" rel="nofollow">http://www.seesharppress.com/20reasons.html#numberfifteen</a></p>
<p>HOLY TRINITY<br />
The Holy Trinity of Egypt consisted of what we call today a nuclear family, father, mother &amp; child, [Kemetic names - Ausar, Aset &amp; Heru = Later came, Greek names - Osiris, Isis &amp; Horus] which would seem easier to comprehend and follow do to its composition.  Misogyny, inspired the fathers of the church to destroy that female image in divinity.   You stated, &#8220;the christian world view is superior&#8221;, as though christianity has originated all information EVER presented.  Even Einstein&#8217;s equations seem to be a christian property if I&#8217;m comprehending correctly.  Michael wrote, &#8220;The Christian can account for such things: They reflect the all-knowing mind of God; mankind has been made in God’s image; and we live in the world God has made, with its natural laws and principles, possessing minds that can perceive, think, and reason. How does your worldview account for such things as abstract laws and the laws of logic?&#8221;.   All christians have this all-knowing mind of god?  You all interface with Bluetooth technology or something, if that is the case why you all stopped interfacing with Bush, pretty messed-up situation we in economically speaking?   Star-Trek, Cyborg sect! </p>
<p>GENERAL SECTION<br />
AGNOSTICISM<br />
Definition of Agnosticism which I choose to say is truth therefor I shall adopt it as my belief as factual information!   Thomas Henry Huxley, stated, &#8220;That it is wrong for a man to say he is certain of the objective truth of a proposition unless he can provide evidence which logically justifies that certainty. This is what agnosticism asserts and in my opinion, is all that is essential to agnosticism. ["Christianity and Agnosticism," 1889]  <a href="http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/sn-huxley.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/sn-huxley.html</a></p>
<p>SEASONS<br />
Yes, god gets the credit for all that which man is lacking knowledge to or just choose to believe such as Michael&#8217;s statement, &#8220;He sustains me. He sustains the universe. The sun rises and sets by His decree. Winter changes to spring, spring to summer, summer to fall; since the creation of the world the seasons have changed this way. God has assured believers that the seasons will change this way until the end&#8221;.   I can not say it is so.  I was once a god-knower such as yourself and I know plenty of philosophies of the intellectual design argument, philosophy can state a principle worthy practice, state a fact of existence  or enforce an unprovable point.  Here is a good one, you can have it , &#8220;the universe is by intellectual design, creation through chaos &amp; randomness is about as logical as a printing company exploding and in the remains you find a dictionary as part of the result of the explosion&#8221;.  </p>
<p>If you are a studious studier you can come up with plenty wisdom that will guide generations to come, but can not the bible or Quran be a series of wisdom notes of individuals throughout history?  I know of bible codes and the mathematical miracle of the Quran still I see no intervention in human affairs so I choose to exist within an efficiency setting, &#8220;if it does not justifies my practice with some type of benefit then it will be cut from the to do list&#8221;.  Every human being on this earth is trying to do one thing &#8220;achieve the desired result in all aspects of life they can, as much as they can&#8221;.  No body is doing anything for no reason, people tithe and pray hoping that god will improve their condition of life and die without enough money to bury themselves. If they knew no results was coming would they continue, I know of miracles of the human will and that is what I see it as human triumph. </p>
<p>Michael wrote &#8211; &#8220;The Christian can account for such things: They reflect the all-knowing mind of God; mankind has been made in God’s image; and we live in the world God has made, with its natural laws and principles, possessing minds that can perceive, think, and reason&#8221;.  With this type thinking all other ideology is inferior and those that embrace them are inferior this is why the pope acted out an apologize for slavery, all religions have this mentality [competition brings this about, institutional survival] as I stated in my first insert in DBS, this is the reason the Gaza strip is a battle front now or is it for the stolen land, stolen cause it suppose to be holy land, yep religion is at the root&#8230;at least by my perception. </p>
<p>ORIGIN<br />
Before there was written language man communicated with art and the things man drew on mostly are the things which psychologist say will occupies man&#8217;s mental though process mostly throughout his individual tenure on earth, animals he ate and the female or food and sex.  Our knowledge evolved to being able to master our environment, agriculture, now we are Sun worshipers cause we know our harvest which is our way of sustaining our life at the time, Sun is the source of our survival.  Sun travels in 12 constellations, [12 zodiac signs] hence 12 disciples, winter solstice 12/22,23,24 shortest days of the year 25th day gets longer [death &amp; resurection] and pagan celebrations that predates christmas were done.  Christmas was not brought to this country on Plymouth Rock, during the 13 colonies in states like Massachusetts there were laws that stated, &#8221; you will be fined if seen celebrating on this date, your business will be fined if closed on 12/25&#8243;, seen as a pagan &amp; forbiden practice.&#8221; </p>
<p>PERCEPTION<br />
Michael wrote &#8211; &#8220;Therefore, if there be any true, objective knowledge, all perceptions cannot be correct&#8221;.  Prove with evidence on logical and scientific grounds you are correct with these fairy-tales or is this your belief you choose to believe in.  Do I just have to believe to perceive this is true?  </p>
<p>#1- &#8220;He has saved me. He sustains me. He sustains the universe. The sun rises and sets by His decree. Winter changes to spring, spring to summer, summer to fall; since the creation of the world the seasons have changed this way. God has assured believers that the seasons will change this way until the end&#8221;.<br />
#2 &#8211; &#8220;God has revealed Himself to us in the person of Jesus Christ, who was with God in the beginning and was God, who died for our sin and is the righteousness of all those who accept Him as Lord and Savior&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Yep, I was with my father in the beginning to, in his testicles so I guess I was my father to, that makes sense!</p>
<p>In the perception of god-knowers there is no middle spectrum there is only belief or atheist.  </p>
<p>Michael I truly dig exchanging with you and you are not wrong for doing you and there is an argument for plenty of things and this can go on, and on, and on, and on, and on.  I&#8217;m done, until next time I get inspired to write on something.  Agnosticism, is a new concept for me so it is like a new toy that I will one day get use to and just live it no need to debate or express it, I&#8217;m just building.  More [5] of my articles are at Helium.com, search with Howard Fitz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1384</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1384</guid>
		<description>Really this sounds ridiculous. your religion doesn&#039;t matter any more to me then say a wiccan does to you. you couldn&#039;t be more wrong your beliefs aren&#039;t important to any one but you and that doesn&#039;t make them any less incorrect.  your reading of the bible, making sense out of poorly written garbage. doesn&#039;t make the bible not garbage, it just makes it your garbage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really this sounds ridiculous. your religion doesn&#8217;t matter any more to me then say a wiccan does to you. you couldn&#8217;t be more wrong your beliefs aren&#8217;t important to any one but you and that doesn&#8217;t make them any less incorrect.  your reading of the bible, making sense out of poorly written garbage. doesn&#8217;t make the bible not garbage, it just makes it your garbage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1378</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 20:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1378</guid>
		<description>Howard,

Thank you for your reply.  There are some apparent contradictions in the Scriptures; they are not contradictions at all.  Those who lack familiarity with the Scriptures or discernment might see these as contradictions.  That does not make them so.  

What are the fables you claim the Scriptures contain?         

Yes, two plus two does equal four.  If someone perceived a different answer, say five, you would perceive, correctly, that he or she was in error.  So would most.  Therefore, if there be any true, objective knowledge, all perceptions cannot be correct.  

Your perception that two plus two equals four is based on abstract mathematical laws and immaterial laws of logic.  The Christian can account for such things:  They reflect the all-knowing mind of God; mankind has been made in God&#039;s image; and we live in the world God has made, with its natural laws and principles, possessing minds that can perceive, think, and reason.  How does your worldview account for such things as abstract laws and the laws of logic?

You profess agnosticism.  I understand this to mean that you believe ultimate reality -- God, if He exists -- is unknowable.  In rejecting the possibility of knowing God, an agnostic claims to know something truly about ultimate reality: that God is unknowable.  Agnosticism thus ends in contradiction: We cannot truly know if God exists, but if He exists we can truly know something about Him:  that He is unknowable.           

Has my God distanced Himself from me and the world since the days of old?  Absolutely not.  He has saved me.  He sustains me.  He sustains the universe.  The sun rises and sets by His decree.  Winter changes to spring, spring to summer, summer to fall; since the creation of the world the seasons have changed this way.  God has assured believers that the seasons will change this way until the end.

Howard, you, too, undoubtedly expect that winter will yield to spring;  that gravity will keep your feet on the ground tomorrow just as it has today; that the laws of physics will operate tomorrow as they have today.  Why do you expect this?  Is your expectation justified?  The empiricist David Hume faced the problem of induction: What reason have we to believe the future will be like the past?  One merely begs the question by relying on past experience to prove what future experience will be like.

The Christian has an answer to Hume&#039;s (and all unbelievers&#039;) problem:  We know the future will resemble the past because God has so ordained.  Genesis 8:22 reads: &quot;While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.&quot;  Reality is knowable because God has established this world and made us in His image with minds that must think His thoughts after Him.  

In our heart of hearts, we all know the one true God; but we oppose Him by nature (Romans 1: 18-20: &quot;For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19 because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse..&quot;).  

We want to be autonomous.  We fear His righteous judgments, as well we should.  But we cannot escape Him.  We cannot escape the world He has made.  Psalm 139 reads, in part:  

1 O LORD, you have searched me 
       and you know me. 
 2 You know when I sit and when I rise; 
       you perceive my thoughts from afar. 

 3 You discern my going out and my lying down; 
       you are familiar with all my ways. 

 4 Before a word is on my tongue 
       you know it completely, O LORD. 

 5 You hem me in—behind and before; 
       you have laid your hand upon me. 

 6 Such knowledge is too wonderful for me, 
       too lofty for me to attain. 

 7 Where can I go from your Spirit? 
       Where can I flee from your presence? 

 8 If I go up to the heavens, you are there; 
       if I make my bed in the depths, [a] you are there. 

 9 If I rise on the wings of the dawn, 
       if I settle on the far side of the sea, 

 10 even there your hand will guide me, 
       your right hand will hold me fast.

Howard, I pray that you will know God as I have come to know Him.  I, too, ran.  He rescued me.

God has revealed Himself to us in the person of Jesus Christ, who was with God in the beginning and was God, who died for our sin and is the righteousness of all those who accept Him as Lord and Savior.

From the fifth chapter of Romans:

6For while we were still weak, at the right time Christ died for the ungodly.  7For one will scarcely die for a righteous person—though perhaps for a good person one would dare even to die— 8but God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.  9Since, therefore, we have now been justified by his blood, much more shall we be saved by him from the wrath of God.  10For if while we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, now that we are reconciled, shall we be saved by his life.  11More than that, we also rejoice in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have now received reconciliation. 

May God bless,
Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard,</p>
<p>Thank you for your reply.  There are some apparent contradictions in the Scriptures; they are not contradictions at all.  Those who lack familiarity with the Scriptures or discernment might see these as contradictions.  That does not make them so.  </p>
<p>What are the fables you claim the Scriptures contain?         </p>
<p>Yes, two plus two does equal four.  If someone perceived a different answer, say five, you would perceive, correctly, that he or she was in error.  So would most.  Therefore, if there be any true, objective knowledge, all perceptions cannot be correct.  </p>
<p>Your perception that two plus two equals four is based on abstract mathematical laws and immaterial laws of logic.  The Christian can account for such things:  They reflect the all-knowing mind of God; mankind has been made in God&#8217;s image; and we live in the world God has made, with its natural laws and principles, possessing minds that can perceive, think, and reason.  How does your worldview account for such things as abstract laws and the laws of logic?</p>
<p>You profess agnosticism.  I understand this to mean that you believe ultimate reality &#8212; God, if He exists &#8212; is unknowable.  In rejecting the possibility of knowing God, an agnostic claims to know something truly about ultimate reality: that God is unknowable.  Agnosticism thus ends in contradiction: We cannot truly know if God exists, but if He exists we can truly know something about Him:  that He is unknowable.           </p>
<p>Has my God distanced Himself from me and the world since the days of old?  Absolutely not.  He has saved me.  He sustains me.  He sustains the universe.  The sun rises and sets by His decree.  Winter changes to spring, spring to summer, summer to fall; since the creation of the world the seasons have changed this way.  God has assured believers that the seasons will change this way until the end.</p>
<p>Howard, you, too, undoubtedly expect that winter will yield to spring;  that gravity will keep your feet on the ground tomorrow just as it has today; that the laws of physics will operate tomorrow as they have today.  Why do you expect this?  Is your expectation justified?  The empiricist David Hume faced the problem of induction: What reason have we to believe the future will be like the past?  One merely begs the question by relying on past experience to prove what future experience will be like.</p>
<p>The Christian has an answer to Hume&#8217;s (and all unbelievers&#8217;) problem:  We know the future will resemble the past because God has so ordained.  Genesis 8:22 reads: &#8220;While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.&#8221;  Reality is knowable because God has established this world and made us in His image with minds that must think His thoughts after Him.  </p>
<p>In our heart of hearts, we all know the one true God; but we oppose Him by nature (Romans 1: 18-20: &#8220;For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19 because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse..&#8221;).  </p>
<p>We want to be autonomous.  We fear His righteous judgments, as well we should.  But we cannot escape Him.  We cannot escape the world He has made.  Psalm 139 reads, in part:  </p>
<p>1 O LORD, you have searched me<br />
       and you know me.<br />
 2 You know when I sit and when I rise;<br />
       you perceive my thoughts from afar. </p>
<p> 3 You discern my going out and my lying down;<br />
       you are familiar with all my ways. </p>
<p> 4 Before a word is on my tongue<br />
       you know it completely, O LORD. </p>
<p> 5 You hem me in—behind and before;<br />
       you have laid your hand upon me. </p>
<p> 6 Such knowledge is too wonderful for me,<br />
       too lofty for me to attain. </p>
<p> 7 Where can I go from your Spirit?<br />
       Where can I flee from your presence? </p>
<p> 8 If I go up to the heavens, you are there;<br />
       if I make my bed in the depths, [a] you are there. </p>
<p> 9 If I rise on the wings of the dawn,<br />
       if I settle on the far side of the sea, </p>
<p> 10 even there your hand will guide me,<br />
       your right hand will hold me fast.</p>
<p>Howard, I pray that you will know God as I have come to know Him.  I, too, ran.  He rescued me.</p>
<p>God has revealed Himself to us in the person of Jesus Christ, who was with God in the beginning and was God, who died for our sin and is the righteousness of all those who accept Him as Lord and Savior.</p>
<p>From the fifth chapter of Romans:</p>
<p>6For while we were still weak, at the right time Christ died for the ungodly.  7For one will scarcely die for a righteous person—though perhaps for a good person one would dare even to die— 8but God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.  9Since, therefore, we have now been justified by his blood, much more shall we be saved by him from the wrath of God.  10For if while we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, now that we are reconciled, shall we be saved by his life.  11More than that, we also rejoice in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have now received reconciliation. </p>
<p>May God bless,<br />
Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1377</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 01:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1377</guid>
		<description>Hey Michael 

Fables:  David Annis has already linked you to the thousands of contradictions of the bible so yeah FABLES, anything that can&#039;t happen today did not happen yesterday or did your god once care but stopped intervening in human affairs?  Where are the revelators of today, what does someone walking on water has to do with humanities&#039;s  salvation?  

David Copperfield, made the Statue of Liberty disappear, isn&#039;t that god work? 

Where did you get this, &quot;If nothing can be proven, how would we know that? If nothing can be proven why should anyone believe you?&quot;   I did not say NOTHING its proven, 2+2=4, plenty things provable just separate that which is provable from that which is BELIEF!   

I humble myself to represent only that which I understand, creation is a theory therefore the involvement of a creator is a theory, I prescribe to none of them.  I do not know how we got here, time has erased all evidence or the social engineers wish to keep that knowledge secret!  The bible cover 6,000 years of time, most archeological &amp; historical evidence available proves that humans predate 6,000 years, Pyramid.  The North American Indians suppose to had came here 15,000 years ago.  

As Napoleon Bonaparte said, &quot;History is a lie agreed upon&quot;.  You go with your story and I go with mine!  Reality.  

Axiom: Self supporting statement.  How many of these do the bible have?  

Michael - Is there really no reality?  I my life is shaped by my experiences whether I experienced a book or an event the result is an information upgrade.  Perception are unique to the individual, I have that which is true to me and you have that which is true to you beyond the scope of religion.  

Remember, the assignments given that we were to write our perceptions of some recent event or topic that could not be wrong it is just our different feedback displaying our uniqueness.  No realities dealing with social sciences, there very few if any principles that could be pushed upon the whole of humanity that is justifiable cause the no one can account for ALL the different conditions in which ALL humans exist.  How about that I narrowed it down to social sciences?  Its our perception of reality and it can&#039;t answer for all humans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Michael </p>
<p>Fables:  David Annis has already linked you to the thousands of contradictions of the bible so yeah FABLES, anything that can&#8217;t happen today did not happen yesterday or did your god once care but stopped intervening in human affairs?  Where are the revelators of today, what does someone walking on water has to do with humanities&#8217;s  salvation?  </p>
<p>David Copperfield, made the Statue of Liberty disappear, isn&#8217;t that god work? </p>
<p>Where did you get this, &#8220;If nothing can be proven, how would we know that? If nothing can be proven why should anyone believe you?&#8221;   I did not say NOTHING its proven, 2+2=4, plenty things provable just separate that which is provable from that which is BELIEF!   </p>
<p>I humble myself to represent only that which I understand, creation is a theory therefore the involvement of a creator is a theory, I prescribe to none of them.  I do not know how we got here, time has erased all evidence or the social engineers wish to keep that knowledge secret!  The bible cover 6,000 years of time, most archeological &amp; historical evidence available proves that humans predate 6,000 years, Pyramid.  The North American Indians suppose to had came here 15,000 years ago.  </p>
<p>As Napoleon Bonaparte said, &#8220;History is a lie agreed upon&#8221;.  You go with your story and I go with mine!  Reality.  </p>
<p>Axiom: Self supporting statement.  How many of these do the bible have?  </p>
<p>Michael &#8211; Is there really no reality?  I my life is shaped by my experiences whether I experienced a book or an event the result is an information upgrade.  Perception are unique to the individual, I have that which is true to me and you have that which is true to you beyond the scope of religion.  </p>
<p>Remember, the assignments given that we were to write our perceptions of some recent event or topic that could not be wrong it is just our different feedback displaying our uniqueness.  No realities dealing with social sciences, there very few if any principles that could be pushed upon the whole of humanity that is justifiable cause the no one can account for ALL the different conditions in which ALL humans exist.  How about that I narrowed it down to social sciences?  Its our perception of reality and it can&#8217;t answer for all humans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1376</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1376</guid>
		<description>Hello Howard.

I read your remarks, which made me wonder about some things:

&quot;Religious Scripture: Is like a read along pamphlet of a telemarketer, “say these things to get the sale”, but this is the feel-good hustle though there is a lofty principle illustration in these fables but why does it have to come at a fee?&quot;

You call the Scriptures (the Holy Bible) &quot;fables.&quot;  How do you know this?  How can agnosticism permit such a confident claim about the nature of the Scriptures, or anything for that matter?


&quot;The agnostic is a neutral party and states neither end of the spectrum can prove they are CORRECT, why exist in the extremes? I am the judge in this case and I have to dismiss the case due to a lack of EVIDENCE on each side, I can no longer give a decree! Truth without proof is superstition!&quot;

If nothing can be proven, how would we know that?  If nothing can be proven why should anyone believe you?  


&quot;Everything is perception and there is NO REALITY, we all function off our perception.&quot;

Is there really no reality? 


I ask that you consider what the Bible teaches about Jesus Christ:

&quot;For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him&quot;

Colossians 1:16


It is because of this truth that we can know anything truly.


May God bless you. 

Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Howard.</p>
<p>I read your remarks, which made me wonder about some things:</p>
<p>&#8220;Religious Scripture: Is like a read along pamphlet of a telemarketer, “say these things to get the sale”, but this is the feel-good hustle though there is a lofty principle illustration in these fables but why does it have to come at a fee?&#8221;</p>
<p>You call the Scriptures (the Holy Bible) &#8220;fables.&#8221;  How do you know this?  How can agnosticism permit such a confident claim about the nature of the Scriptures, or anything for that matter?</p>
<p>&#8220;The agnostic is a neutral party and states neither end of the spectrum can prove they are CORRECT, why exist in the extremes? I am the judge in this case and I have to dismiss the case due to a lack of EVIDENCE on each side, I can no longer give a decree! Truth without proof is superstition!&#8221;</p>
<p>If nothing can be proven, how would we know that?  If nothing can be proven why should anyone believe you?  </p>
<p>&#8220;Everything is perception and there is NO REALITY, we all function off our perception.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is there really no reality? </p>
<p>I ask that you consider what the Bible teaches about Jesus Christ:</p>
<p>&#8220;For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him&#8221;</p>
<p>Colossians 1:16</p>
<p>It is because of this truth that we can know anything truly.</p>
<p>May God bless you. </p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1373</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1373</guid>
		<description>The filter screwed up my THE GOD SPECTRUM:  
Atheist//Agnostic//God-Knower.  Filter does not recognize multiple hyphens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The filter screwed up my THE GOD SPECTRUM:<br />
Atheist//Agnostic//God-Knower.  Filter does not recognize multiple hyphens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1372</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1372</guid>
		<description>It is the analyzer in me that likes this, unfortunately regardless of the religion it produces the same reactory types unable to separate that which they feel strongly PASSIONATE about to the realization of the agnostic point of view, which is there is no way they can prove most that they believe.  They are not wrong just confused to their emotional feelings and provable information, some story they went by all their life and never got beside themselves to ask, &quot;is this the truth that no man can say isn&#039;t, like the sun is the source of life on this planet&quot;, then research it.  I recently engaged in a perception exchange conversation which got to the point of intolerance to a different view which is an imperialistic characteristic of religion.  An institutional entity must produce as any entity in some way, this is why they exist to influence the actions of people, by way of its so-called practitioners sponsoring of the entity&#039;s hierarchy and beyond this.  Self-Preservation is a chararcteristic shared amongs all entities [corporate, institutions, political, religious], that is why the [religions] are here for thousands of years, it is self-perpetuated and guilty of producing many of the problems they claim they are here to cure humanity of.  To make the sale you must expose the preceived problem and have the ability to supply a solution!  Unknowing or lack of thinking by most god-knowers belief is not synonymous with behavior, one does not beget the other!

Religious Scripture: Is like a read along pamphlet of a telemarketer, &quot;say these things to get the sale&quot;, but this is the feel-good hustle though there is a lofty principle illustration in these fables but why does it have to come at a fee?  Such a fee that I hear of Mega Churches, having &quot;New Member Packets&quot;, that ask for your identification information to possibly perform a credit score check, amount you pay in taxes, home value and income, thats just some!  Prophecy....... please, human cycles of existence like clothes &amp; hair trends, those that has happened will happen again!

Coping Mechanism: In human development, I see the child with no worries for they are the responsibility of the parents, as they get to their age of responsibility then they start getting acquainted with worry, with that said, is it hard to conceive of the purpose to invent a personal god that is designed to share your life burdens or relieve you of them totally?  As Karl Marx said, &quot;religion is the opiate of the people&quot;.  Opiate = opium, plant that cocaine derives from. 

Agnostic point of view defined, THE GOD SPECTRUM:      

AtheistGod-Knower
The agnostic is a neutral party and states neither end of the spectrum can prove they are CORRECT, why exist in the extremes?  I am the judge in this case and I have to dismiss the case due to a lack of EVIDENCE on each side, I can no longer give a decree!  Truth without proof is superstition!  Term normally used for the god-knower is a Theist, my knowledge of words tells me this word is in close relation to theory and thesis both meaning the same thing, UNPROVEN.  Theology, is a theory study, from a etymological perspective not historical origins perspective.

My Theory, if anyone set up philosophical principles and an organizational structure for an agnostic gathering then they would have just created a religion!   Some will never study to reach a higher enlightenment so they would be the fickle reactory followers that will be similar to the god-knowers, they&#039;re right and everyone not of their ideology is wrong.  Everybody claims the are on the winning team, in this dichotomy there is either the right/good/winners or the wrong/bad/losers, this negatively affects humanity cause we can&#039;t deal justly with these perceptions!   

I have not conversed much in this realm lately but this will come to be a bore soon for I run into the same reactory type, they do not read what is before them they just get feed-up and react, I dig seeing how people mind&#039;s work but really....they all work the FN same, bound in religion!

HOWARD&#039;S definition of - Superstition:  Giving something power over you that can&#039;t help you nor harm you. 

MERRIAM-WEBSTER&#039;S definition of - Superstition: 1a: A belief or practice resulting from ignorance, fear of the unknown, trust in magic or chance, or a false conception of causation
1b: an irrational abject attitude of mind toward the supernatural, nature, or God resulting from superstition
2: a notion maintained despite evidence to the contrary


I have no desire to offend or make enemies, life is much better gathering friends along the way I do wish to shock &amp; aw, into a consideration of getting beside yourself to see if you can distinguish between what is provable information and what is perception.   Everything is perception and there is NO REALITY, we all function off our perception.  Perception is the sum of our experiences, from experience comes knowledge whether we experience a book, classroom or event the result is the same an information upgrade.  This is my perception on religion, I do not say any one religion in particular is wrong they all beget a gang mentality which I think the whole of humanity can do without. 


Me, birth to 13, under the title of christian, 13-15 questioned the god concept and 15-30 under the title of islam, [Nation of Islam].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is the analyzer in me that likes this, unfortunately regardless of the religion it produces the same reactory types unable to separate that which they feel strongly PASSIONATE about to the realization of the agnostic point of view, which is there is no way they can prove most that they believe.  They are not wrong just confused to their emotional feelings and provable information, some story they went by all their life and never got beside themselves to ask, &#8220;is this the truth that no man can say isn&#8217;t, like the sun is the source of life on this planet&#8221;, then research it.  I recently engaged in a perception exchange conversation which got to the point of intolerance to a different view which is an imperialistic characteristic of religion.  An institutional entity must produce as any entity in some way, this is why they exist to influence the actions of people, by way of its so-called practitioners sponsoring of the entity&#8217;s hierarchy and beyond this.  Self-Preservation is a chararcteristic shared amongs all entities [corporate, institutions, political, religious], that is why the [religions] are here for thousands of years, it is self-perpetuated and guilty of producing many of the problems they claim they are here to cure humanity of.  To make the sale you must expose the preceived problem and have the ability to supply a solution!  Unknowing or lack of thinking by most god-knowers belief is not synonymous with behavior, one does not beget the other!</p>
<p>Religious Scripture: Is like a read along pamphlet of a telemarketer, &#8220;say these things to get the sale&#8221;, but this is the feel-good hustle though there is a lofty principle illustration in these fables but why does it have to come at a fee?  Such a fee that I hear of Mega Churches, having &#8220;New Member Packets&#8221;, that ask for your identification information to possibly perform a credit score check, amount you pay in taxes, home value and income, thats just some!  Prophecy&#8230;&#8230;. please, human cycles of existence like clothes &amp; hair trends, those that has happened will happen again!</p>
<p>Coping Mechanism: In human development, I see the child with no worries for they are the responsibility of the parents, as they get to their age of responsibility then they start getting acquainted with worry, with that said, is it hard to conceive of the purpose to invent a personal god that is designed to share your life burdens or relieve you of them totally?  As Karl Marx said, &#8220;religion is the opiate of the people&#8221;.  Opiate = opium, plant that cocaine derives from. </p>
<p>Agnostic point of view defined, THE GOD SPECTRUM:      </p>
<p>AtheistGod-Knower<br />
The agnostic is a neutral party and states neither end of the spectrum can prove they are CORRECT, why exist in the extremes?  I am the judge in this case and I have to dismiss the case due to a lack of EVIDENCE on each side, I can no longer give a decree!  Truth without proof is superstition!  Term normally used for the god-knower is a Theist, my knowledge of words tells me this word is in close relation to theory and thesis both meaning the same thing, UNPROVEN.  Theology, is a theory study, from a etymological perspective not historical origins perspective.</p>
<p>My Theory, if anyone set up philosophical principles and an organizational structure for an agnostic gathering then they would have just created a religion!   Some will never study to reach a higher enlightenment so they would be the fickle reactory followers that will be similar to the god-knowers, they&#8217;re right and everyone not of their ideology is wrong.  Everybody claims the are on the winning team, in this dichotomy there is either the right/good/winners or the wrong/bad/losers, this negatively affects humanity cause we can&#8217;t deal justly with these perceptions!   </p>
<p>I have not conversed much in this realm lately but this will come to be a bore soon for I run into the same reactory type, they do not read what is before them they just get feed-up and react, I dig seeing how people mind&#8217;s work but really&#8230;.they all work the FN same, bound in religion!</p>
<p>HOWARD&#8217;S definition of &#8211; Superstition:  Giving something power over you that can&#8217;t help you nor harm you. </p>
<p>MERRIAM-WEBSTER&#8217;S definition of &#8211; Superstition: 1a: A belief or practice resulting from ignorance, fear of the unknown, trust in magic or chance, or a false conception of causation<br />
1b: an irrational abject attitude of mind toward the supernatural, nature, or God resulting from superstition<br />
2: a notion maintained despite evidence to the contrary</p>
<p>I have no desire to offend or make enemies, life is much better gathering friends along the way I do wish to shock &amp; aw, into a consideration of getting beside yourself to see if you can distinguish between what is provable information and what is perception.   Everything is perception and there is NO REALITY, we all function off our perception.  Perception is the sum of our experiences, from experience comes knowledge whether we experience a book, classroom or event the result is the same an information upgrade.  This is my perception on religion, I do not say any one religion in particular is wrong they all beget a gang mentality which I think the whole of humanity can do without. </p>
<p>Me, birth to 13, under the title of christian, 13-15 questioned the god concept and 15-30 under the title of islam, [Nation of Islam].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra H</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1363</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1363</guid>
		<description>As bad as what happened to your son was, it doesn&#039;t compare with &quot;old&quot; Italy: Jewish couples would often employ Christian nannies because they could work during the Sabbath (remember Jews aren&#039;t even supposed to light fire on the day). There were occasional cases of nannies baptising the children in their care; just a few short words and some water and it was done. Because these children were now Christian, they could no longer be allowed to be raised by Jews and so they were confiscated and sent to group homes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As bad as what happened to your son was, it doesn&#8217;t compare with &#8220;old&#8221; Italy: Jewish couples would often employ Christian nannies because they could work during the Sabbath (remember Jews aren&#8217;t even supposed to light fire on the day). There were occasional cases of nannies baptising the children in their care; just a few short words and some water and it was done. Because these children were now Christian, they could no longer be allowed to be raised by Jews and so they were confiscated and sent to group homes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1362</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1362</guid>
		<description>While in general I agree with you, and I think your housekeeper should be fired immediately, your assertion that you try to convince believers that their god doesn&#039;t exist contradicts your reasons to be against religion in the first place:

&quot;These religions encourage their believers to think that they have a monopoly on the truth, that they need to restrict the actions of others based on their beliefs, and that they must convince others to think as they do.&quot;

WE don&#039;t have a monopoly on the truth with our absence of belief. And you&#039;re trying to convince others to believe as you do. As conscientious atheists, don&#039;t you think we have an obligation to live the beliefs that we&#039;re trying to establish? NOT insisting that others believe as we do? I like to hope that my lifestyle, my acceptance of others&#039; beliefs, and the careful application of rational thought, is enough to help people find a better path. Either through religious belief tempered with rationality and compassion, or by leaving those religious beliefs behind at their own pace and in their own ways. 

Religious belief serves a basic and important purpose in peoples&#039; lives. It can&#039;t simply be cast off without having something to put in its place, which would leave people anchorless and distraught. I think it&#039;s important to help people find the something they can put in its place rather than just pulling the rug out from under them. 

I&#039;m sorry about your son. That must have been frightening. I wish you and your family the best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While in general I agree with you, and I think your housekeeper should be fired immediately, your assertion that you try to convince believers that their god doesn&#8217;t exist contradicts your reasons to be against religion in the first place:</p>
<p>&#8220;These religions encourage their believers to think that they have a monopoly on the truth, that they need to restrict the actions of others based on their beliefs, and that they must convince others to think as they do.&#8221;</p>
<p>WE don&#8217;t have a monopoly on the truth with our absence of belief. And you&#8217;re trying to convince others to believe as you do. As conscientious atheists, don&#8217;t you think we have an obligation to live the beliefs that we&#8217;re trying to establish? NOT insisting that others believe as we do? I like to hope that my lifestyle, my acceptance of others&#8217; beliefs, and the careful application of rational thought, is enough to help people find a better path. Either through religious belief tempered with rationality and compassion, or by leaving those religious beliefs behind at their own pace and in their own ways. </p>
<p>Religious belief serves a basic and important purpose in peoples&#8217; lives. It can&#8217;t simply be cast off without having something to put in its place, which would leave people anchorless and distraught. I think it&#8217;s important to help people find the something they can put in its place rather than just pulling the rug out from under them. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry about your son. That must have been frightening. I wish you and your family the best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Jerk</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator>The Jerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1360</guid>
		<description>My goodness, you overlooked that comic masterpiece, &quot;The Jerk&quot;, perhaps the funniest 94 minutes ever put to celluloid!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My goodness, you overlooked that comic masterpiece, &#8220;The Jerk&#8221;, perhaps the funniest 94 minutes ever put to celluloid!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1359</link>
		<dc:creator>DB Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 04:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1359</guid>
		<description>Two comments already, and no one&#039;s commented yet on the Steve Martin bash? :)

Personally, I think Steve has sold out the last many years with blatant money grabs (particularly embarrassing and insulting have been the Pink Panther remakes), but I give the man a full pass. He can do whatever he wants because of his previous funny work. That&#039;s not even during his &quot;wild and crazy&quot; years, either. There are his various books. His movies like &quot;L.A. Story&quot;, &quot;Roxanne&quot;, &quot;The Three Amigos&quot;, &quot;All of Me&quot;, &quot;Little Shop of Horrors&quot;, &quot;Planes, Trains and Automobiles&quot; and other great comedies. Heck, he was cool in &quot;The Spanish Prisoner&quot;, and never cracked a joke.

Okay, back on to the actual topic: I really liked this article, because this is a common question: &quot;Why do you care so much about what people think? What difference does it make to you?&quot; And like David Annis alluded with his tolerance of Taoism, if it doesn&#039;t affect you, you can let it be. If it affects you and those you love, it *is* worth mentioning. Religion, whether or not you are religious, will affect your life. Part of its mandate is to expand and affect as many people as possible.

Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two comments already, and no one&#8217;s commented yet on the Steve Martin bash? :)</p>
<p>Personally, I think Steve has sold out the last many years with blatant money grabs (particularly embarrassing and insulting have been the Pink Panther remakes), but I give the man a full pass. He can do whatever he wants because of his previous funny work. That&#8217;s not even during his &#8220;wild and crazy&#8221; years, either. There are his various books. His movies like &#8220;L.A. Story&#8221;, &#8220;Roxanne&#8221;, &#8220;The Three Amigos&#8221;, &#8220;All of Me&#8221;, &#8220;Little Shop of Horrors&#8221;, &#8220;Planes, Trains and Automobiles&#8221; and other great comedies. Heck, he was cool in &#8220;The Spanish Prisoner&#8221;, and never cracked a joke.</p>
<p>Okay, back on to the actual topic: I really liked this article, because this is a common question: &#8220;Why do you care so much about what people think? What difference does it make to you?&#8221; And like David Annis alluded with his tolerance of Taoism, if it doesn&#8217;t affect you, you can let it be. If it affects you and those you love, it *is* worth mentioning. Religion, whether or not you are religious, will affect your life. Part of its mandate is to expand and affect as many people as possible.</p>
<p>Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1358</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1358</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m hoping you got a different housekeeper? Boy, I sure would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m hoping you got a different housekeeper? Boy, I sure would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/01/31/why-pick-on-religion-why-religion-matters-to-the-non-religious/comment-page-1/#comment-1357</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=688#comment-1357</guid>
		<description>Your cleaner really stepped hugely over the line.  It&#039;s fine for her to tell him about Christianity, but deliberately undermining you and your wife&#039;s shared trust with your son is unforgiveable.  I hope you&#039;ve let her go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your cleaner really stepped hugely over the line.  It&#8217;s fine for her to tell him about Christianity, but deliberately undermining you and your wife&#8217;s shared trust with your son is unforgiveable.  I hope you&#8217;ve let her go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
