Trading my fingers for aliens

2009 April 12

By Nick Farrantello
Article ID: 1316

I don’t believe in anything. UFOs, Bigfoot, ESP, the Loch Ness Monster, ghosts, you name it.  In my mind it’s all a bunch of hooey.  Despite that, I still consider myself very open-minded.   The reason for this is nothing revolutionary.  It’s a reason that other skeptics cite as to why they too are open-minded.  Simply put, I want there to be flying saucers.  Are you kidding?  Alien visitors from another planet, how awesome would that be?   I want there to be a Loch Ness Monster.  The idea of some animal surviving from the age of the dinosaurs would be fascinating.  I want there to be ghosts.  Who in their right mind wouldn’t want there to be an afterlife?  ESP?  Bring it on.  Mindreading would be the bomb. Now, in the spirit of complete disclosure, Bigfoot doesn’t do anything for me.  If there really is some big, hairy, naked guy running around in the woods of Montana, I’d just as soon not know about it.

Pick a myth. Any myth. Now try to disprove it.

To make it absolutely clear, as to how much I would love it if there where aliens, I want to state here and now:  I would sacrifice digits if that would prove the existence of aliens. I am serious. I am willing to give up to four toes (or two fingers) if that loss would somehow help prove the existence of aliens.  Or three fingers if it would help determine that the aliens built the pyramids.  Now, I am not sure what would initiate such an exchange.  Maybe if I found some proof of aliens, and I wanted to share it with the entire world, but at the last minute, government agents discover me. As I make a run for it, I get my hand caught in the screen door.  No, that’s just clumsy. Maybe something involving me escaping from a Russian submarine.  …Yeah, that sounds better.

It doesn’t matter.  I’ll even take the clumsy way.  The point is, I really want there to be aliens. That is why I am open-minded.  And that is why I think other skeptics are open-minded.  Many have the exact same desire I do. Not the thing about the fingers – I believe I’m the only one to say that – the part about them wanting supernatural things to be true. That I have heard from many others.

Carl Sagan expressed this in many of his books.  I’ve heard Steve Novella, the head of the New England Skeptical Society, say it on his podcast.   Even James Randi, the King of all Skeptics, has said stuff like this.   They want ESP and flying saucers and ghosts and yes – God knows why – they even want there to be a Bigfoot.

If you read skeptic literature, you’ve probably heard this appeal to impartiality before.  But here’s an angle on this subject that you might not have heard.  I’ll state it in the form of a challenge.  Show me one person on the other side of these issues that has said the same thing. I don’t mean, show me a believer who thinks it would be cool if aliens existed.  That’s a dime a million.  I’m saying, show me one UFO advocate who has said, “To be honest, I don’t really like the idea of UFOs.”  Show me one biologist who has said, “The Loch Ness Monster?  I assure you the evidence for its existence is most definitely there; but frankly, the entire subject rather bores me.  I have asked my university to approve my grant to study the mealy bug instead, those little creatures, now they really are something.”  Show me one cryptozoologist who has said, “Yes, unfortunately, I captured Bigfoot but I’m not looking forward to all that re-classifying.  It’s just so much paperwork.”

I know you’re thinking this comparison isn’t fair.  Scientists wouldn’t be looking for paranormal stuff if they weren’t interested in it.  But think about all those physicists in the turn of the century that we’ve read about who really hated quantum physics.  It’s messy, anti-intuitive and almost impossible to understand. But – reluctantly – they accepted it.

My examples are written for laughs, but consider the following:  Is there a scientist who is a steadfast atheist, searching for ghosts?  Show me the atheist who doesn’t believe in life after death but is still searching for ghosts because begrudgingly, the evidence has forced him to accept their existence.  Show me the believer who is trying to prove himself wrong.

Instead, what we get are Bigfoot nuts, trying to pass off fuzzy pictures as proof because their favorite episode of the Six Million Dollar Man was the one with the Sasquatch/alien/robot from another planet.  Don’t be coy.  You know the episode I’m talking about.

So I say to you, show me the reluctant believer, the begrudging advocate.  Show me the guy with the proof who continues his research to prove himself wrong, not right.  Until then I’ll continue thinking the way I do.  I’ll continue to hope for real live aliens but settle for Star Trek.

Carl Sagan said it best: “It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is then to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.”



Other articles related to this topic:

17 Comments
2009 April 12

Well I’d rather I died and didn’t have to go on somehow. The nice long sleep is a comforting idea to me, I get sick of living sometimes. I doubt it though because when I talk to people, I sense a spiritual being there and not just a body, and I can’t ignore that strong of an intuition. Also if you think you’re awareness and mind are evolvable since the start of postulated abiogenesis, it’s an insult to your intelligence. I can’t even get a handle on any parameters of my own mind much less how it’s entirely matter based and evolved.
This is the same theme as ghosts and aliens, well I think so anyways.

2009 April 12

i actually believe in aliens. Based on the size of space, it’s hard to believe there aren’t thousands of intelligent civilizations out there. Now whether they’ve visited earth, that’s another story.

2009 April 12

Look up the dogon tribe.

2009 April 13
Discombobulated permalink

Ty@1 said:
I can’t even get a handle on any parameters of my own mind much less how it’s entirely matter based and evolved.

Argument from personal incredulity

2009 April 13
Bob Allen permalink

I like the approach of the base article. The orientation for the “believers” to believe, but attempt to disprove the belief is right on. I too am of the orientation that over a 13.7 Billion light-year span, that somewhere, elsewhere, life formed as life formed around here. So yes, I believe that “aliens” are out there. I believe that they too want to find other “aliens”. But I ain’t run across any convincing evidence, so far.

2009 April 13

Look up the dogon tribe.

I did. How does this apply to the parent article?

Andy

2009 April 13

Regarding the Dogon tribe, Ty appears to be referring to Robert Temple’s wild speculation of an extra-terrestrial source of the Dogon’s knowledge of Sirius and Sirius B, Saturn’s rings, and Jupiter’s moons.

Carl Sagan and Ian Ridpath have pretty much destroyed this hypothesis.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogon#Dogon_and_Sirius
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sirius_Mystery

2009 April 13

I have a very hard time watching the History channel now, as all they seem to show is bible stories and looking at ancient civilizations that, “just couldn’t have produced this kind of architecture without alien intervention!”

Every once in awhile they will put someone sane up for 20-30 seconds, but the majority of the show is dedicated to crackpots with absolutely no credibility.

Amusing for a laugh I guess?

2009 April 13

“Amusing for a laugh I guess?”

Excuse me, I meant good for a laugh… brain shutting down apparently.

2009 April 14
Sandra H permalink

Life after death as a ghost moaning around an old building (or given the number of people dying in auto accidents, sitting disconsolately behind the wheel of a junked car)? No, thanks. No matter how bad it got, you go on and on; sounds kindof hellish. Maybe that’s why god is such a twerp, I’d be getting cranky after an eternity, too (especially with all those well-intentioned but off-key praise groupies, yeesh).

2009 April 14
Gary Peterson permalink

Good piece that made some good points about believers and those actually open-minded. Open mindedness means I must follow where the evidence leads, not just be open to wild and unlikely ideas. Believers seem not to have grasped that basic idea. Also, when it comes to things like ESP, the actual findings of scientific research in psychology show interpersonal communication, nonconscious mimicry, and hosts of other findings to be far more wondrous and fascinating than the psychic woofle dust.

2009 April 15
M Parrott permalink

I completely agree with the statement of the piece. However I’d question the use of the word “alien”. Yes there is no evidence for their exsistance, but you can’t possibly prove that they do not exsist. Now UFOs are bull, but aliens quetionably. I prefer to remain agnostic on aliens. There is no evidence for or against their exsistance, but it’d be cool if they did.

2009 April 15
Gary Peterson permalink

I agree there is no evidence for aliens from outer space, and one cannot argue from absence. I would like however a piece by astronomers or astrophysics types on the problems of space travel and the problems of such life forms being able to make such distances. Also, people thinking that the universe is so huge and that this means that there must be life someplace, should add that the form of life may be bacterial or such and far removed from popular science fiction accounts. Would evolution be the same? Finally, why is it that people think it would be so cool if there were aliens from outer space? That is, what is it about us that motivates such wishfulness?

2009 April 15

Finally, why is it that people think it would be so cool if there were aliens from outer space?

What?! Have you not seen the movie “Men in Black”?!

Answering more seriously, I can tell you why it’d be cool for me: Because it would bring about worldwide change in the following areas:

1) Science research – This would blast through the roof. More science is a good thing.

2) Decrease in religious emphasis – Most of the world’s religions would have to be rethought or discarded. At the very least, they’d have far less of an impact than they do now. This assumes, of course, that any aliens we meet aren’t religious missionaries out to spread the Word of K’th’kr’uth’bx. If so, that could get sticky.

3) Better Lifestyle Through Intergalactic Competition – We’re no longer competing country by country, race by race. We’ve got a galactic civilization to compete with! Maybe it’s too optimistic, but I can see this causing humans to get along better and cooperate to improve our species as a whole. Yes, that’s right – we CAN all get along!

Andy

2009 April 15
Gary Peterson permalink

I can already imagine changes in food cuisine! Yum Yum ;-) Imagine the sexual orientations? Those who feel they are Taxed Enough Already would surely use up their ammo blasting these heathen aliens?! Otherwise, yes, those would be delightful outcomes!

2009 April 16

Thanks for all the comments everyone. I guess I should clarify something. I doubt the existence of flying saucers not the existence of aliens on other planets. Like M Parrott, I also think there probably is life in the universe. The sheer number of stars and galaxies suggests that the chances of life existing on other planets are pretty good. The last I heard science put the number of stars in the universe at “great googly moogly to the tenth power.” But once you invoke those mind blowing numbers you have to continue with that line of reasoning. What are the chances that aliens would be interested in us? one over great googly moogly?

2009 April 19

Also, people thinking that the universe is so huge and that this means that there must be life someplace, should add that the form of life may be bacterial or such and far removed from popular science fiction accounts.

…and…

The sheer number of stars and galaxies suggests that the chances of life existing on other planets are pretty good.

For those who are interested in the discussion regarding the existence of aliens, you may also be interested in this week’s article: The Drake Equation

Andy

Comments are closed for this entry.