<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to be a fakir</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/07/05/how-to-be-a-fakir/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/07/05/how-to-be-a-fakir/</link>
	<description>Skepticism. Critical thinking. Podcast. Community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 08:04:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Kaiser</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/07/05/how-to-be-a-fakir/comment-page-1/#comment-3259</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Kaiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=1191#comment-3259</guid>
		<description>Hi Gary,

&lt;i&gt;Perhaps we need more on how the everyday person should examine issues carefully and practice responsible citizenship?&lt;/i&gt;

I don&#039;t disagree with this, but you seem to indicate the article is missing this aspect (forgive me if I&#039;m misinterpreting)?

I think this article (and others like it) do indeed examine issue carefully, and encourage responsible citizenship - they cause a credulous person to stop and reconsider. It&#039;s fun to know how a trick is performed, of course, and that&#039;s good entertainment value. But another important aspect is the information itself: knowing that something is a trick (and how it&#039;s done), makes you less likely to be fooled using similar methods. For me, that last reason is reason enough to have the article.

Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gary,</p>
<p><i>Perhaps we need more on how the everyday person should examine issues carefully and practice responsible citizenship?</i></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t disagree with this, but you seem to indicate the article is missing this aspect (forgive me if I&#8217;m misinterpreting)?</p>
<p>I think this article (and others like it) do indeed examine issue carefully, and encourage responsible citizenship &#8211; they cause a credulous person to stop and reconsider. It&#8217;s fun to know how a trick is performed, of course, and that&#8217;s good entertainment value. But another important aspect is the information itself: knowing that something is a trick (and how it&#8217;s done), makes you less likely to be fooled using similar methods. For me, that last reason is reason enough to have the article.</p>
<p>Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Parrott</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/07/05/how-to-be-a-fakir/comment-page-1/#comment-3258</link>
		<dc:creator>M Parrott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=1191#comment-3258</guid>
		<description>Well... Questioning issues is a bit hard. James Randi does a lecture on being skeptical talking about as humans we do not question everything and should not. As a great example he shows that he had been talking for 5 minutes with no lenses in his glasses.

As to be a con artist; well some of us have to make a living somehow ;). Nah, I do some of these as a magician, not as a fakir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; Questioning issues is a bit hard. James Randi does a lecture on being skeptical talking about as humans we do not question everything and should not. As a great example he shows that he had been talking for 5 minutes with no lenses in his glasses.</p>
<p>As to be a con artist; well some of us have to make a living somehow ;). Nah, I do some of these as a magician, not as a fakir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.dbskeptic.com/2009/07/05/how-to-be-a-fakir/comment-page-1/#comment-3250</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbskeptic.com/?p=1191#comment-3250</guid>
		<description>Along with Booth&#039;s article on moving from magician to psychic, we have a lot of info on how to become a con artist.  Perhaps we need more on how the everyday person should examine issues carefully and practice responsible citizenship?

While these tricks and feats can appear remarkable, the key to any such demonstration is creating (framing) a context in which they will be seen NOT as tricks, but as special powers or abilities in line with the ideology (supernatural belief/mission) you are trying to sell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Along with Booth&#8217;s article on moving from magician to psychic, we have a lot of info on how to become a con artist.  Perhaps we need more on how the everyday person should examine issues carefully and practice responsible citizenship?</p>
<p>While these tricks and feats can appear remarkable, the key to any such demonstration is creating (framing) a context in which they will be seen NOT as tricks, but as special powers or abilities in line with the ideology (supernatural belief/mission) you are trying to sell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

